即时护理泛素羧基末端水解酶- l1测定在区分外伤性脑损伤影像学异常中的诊断性能:一项TRACK-TBI队列研究

Kevin K. Wang , Jennifer C. Munoz-Pareja , Lauren A. Lautenslager , J. Adrian Tyndall , Zhihui Yang , Maria R. Kerrigan , Ramon Diaz-Arrastia , Frederick K. Korley , David Okonkwo , Ava M. Puccio , John K. Yue , Sabrina R. Taylor , Pratik Mukherjee , Esther L. Yuh , Nancy R. Temkin , Claudia S. Robertson , Xiaoying Sun , Sonia Jain , Amy J. Markowitz , Geoffrey T. Manley , Ross Zafonte
{"title":"即时护理泛素羧基末端水解酶- l1测定在区分外伤性脑损伤影像学异常中的诊断性能:一项TRACK-TBI队列研究","authors":"Kevin K. Wang ,&nbsp;Jennifer C. Munoz-Pareja ,&nbsp;Lauren A. Lautenslager ,&nbsp;J. Adrian Tyndall ,&nbsp;Zhihui Yang ,&nbsp;Maria R. Kerrigan ,&nbsp;Ramon Diaz-Arrastia ,&nbsp;Frederick K. Korley ,&nbsp;David Okonkwo ,&nbsp;Ava M. Puccio ,&nbsp;John K. Yue ,&nbsp;Sabrina R. Taylor ,&nbsp;Pratik Mukherjee ,&nbsp;Esther L. Yuh ,&nbsp;Nancy R. Temkin ,&nbsp;Claudia S. Robertson ,&nbsp;Xiaoying Sun ,&nbsp;Sonia Jain ,&nbsp;Amy J. Markowitz ,&nbsp;Geoffrey T. Manley ,&nbsp;Ross Zafonte","doi":"10.1016/j.abst.2023.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The use of UCH-L1 detection with point-of-care (POC) assay alone has not been characterized for clinical use. This study compares the accuracies of POC UCH-L1 and Neuron-Specific Enolase (NSE) Elecsys® levels for identifying TBI patients with structural abnormalities on neuroimaging.</p><p>The <u>T</u>ransforming <u>R</u>esearch and <u>C</u>linical <u>K</u>nowledge in <u>T</u>raumatic <u>B</u>rain <u>I</u>njury (TRACK-TBI) Phase 1 Cohort, enrolled 1375 TBI patients (GCS 3–15) presenting to one of 18 US Level I trauma centers within 24 h of injury who had an admission head CT; blood samples were collected, along with 122 orthopedic and 209 healthy controls. The TBI cohort consisted of 810 CT-negative (CT-) and 549 CT-positive (CT+) subjects. Of the CT- subjects who had MRIs, 121 were MRI-positive (MRI+) and 333 were MRI-negative (MRI-). UCH-L1 POC showed best diagnostic performance for CT + versus CT-, 0–8 h post-injury with an AUC of 0·779 [0·708–0.850] when compared to the 0–25 h interval, with an AUC of 0.684 [0.655–0.712]. NSE assay has an AUC of 0.695 [0.619–0.770] for the 0–8 h interval and 0.634 [0.603–0.665] for the 0–25 h interval. During the first 8 after injury, POC UCH-L1 outperforms NSE in identifying TBI patients with structural abnormalities on neuroimaging.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72080,"journal":{"name":"Advances in biomarker sciences and technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic performance of point-of-care ubiquitin carboxy-terminal Hydrolase-L1 assay in distinguishing imaging abnormalities in traumatic brain injury: A TRACK-TBI cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Kevin K. Wang ,&nbsp;Jennifer C. Munoz-Pareja ,&nbsp;Lauren A. Lautenslager ,&nbsp;J. Adrian Tyndall ,&nbsp;Zhihui Yang ,&nbsp;Maria R. Kerrigan ,&nbsp;Ramon Diaz-Arrastia ,&nbsp;Frederick K. Korley ,&nbsp;David Okonkwo ,&nbsp;Ava M. Puccio ,&nbsp;John K. Yue ,&nbsp;Sabrina R. Taylor ,&nbsp;Pratik Mukherjee ,&nbsp;Esther L. Yuh ,&nbsp;Nancy R. Temkin ,&nbsp;Claudia S. Robertson ,&nbsp;Xiaoying Sun ,&nbsp;Sonia Jain ,&nbsp;Amy J. Markowitz ,&nbsp;Geoffrey T. Manley ,&nbsp;Ross Zafonte\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.abst.2023.04.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The use of UCH-L1 detection with point-of-care (POC) assay alone has not been characterized for clinical use. This study compares the accuracies of POC UCH-L1 and Neuron-Specific Enolase (NSE) Elecsys® levels for identifying TBI patients with structural abnormalities on neuroimaging.</p><p>The <u>T</u>ransforming <u>R</u>esearch and <u>C</u>linical <u>K</u>nowledge in <u>T</u>raumatic <u>B</u>rain <u>I</u>njury (TRACK-TBI) Phase 1 Cohort, enrolled 1375 TBI patients (GCS 3–15) presenting to one of 18 US Level I trauma centers within 24 h of injury who had an admission head CT; blood samples were collected, along with 122 orthopedic and 209 healthy controls. The TBI cohort consisted of 810 CT-negative (CT-) and 549 CT-positive (CT+) subjects. Of the CT- subjects who had MRIs, 121 were MRI-positive (MRI+) and 333 were MRI-negative (MRI-). UCH-L1 POC showed best diagnostic performance for CT + versus CT-, 0–8 h post-injury with an AUC of 0·779 [0·708–0.850] when compared to the 0–25 h interval, with an AUC of 0.684 [0.655–0.712]. NSE assay has an AUC of 0.695 [0.619–0.770] for the 0–8 h interval and 0.634 [0.603–0.665] for the 0–25 h interval. During the first 8 after injury, POC UCH-L1 outperforms NSE in identifying TBI patients with structural abnormalities on neuroimaging.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72080,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in biomarker sciences and technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in biomarker sciences and technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2543106423000042\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in biomarker sciences and technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2543106423000042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

单独使用UCH-L1检测与护理点(POC)测定尚未被描述为临床使用。本研究比较了POC UCH-L1和神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE) Elecsys®水平在识别神经影像学结构异常的TBI患者中的准确性。创伤性脑损伤的转化研究和临床知识(TRACK-TBI) 1期队列,纳入1375名创伤性脑损伤患者(GCS 3-15),在损伤后24小时内就诊于18个美国一级创伤中心之一,并接受入院头部CT检查;采集了122名骨科患者和209名健康对照者的血液样本。TBI队列包括810名CT阴性(CT-)和549名CT阳性(CT+)受试者。CT-患者行MRI, MRI阳性121例(MRI+), MRI阴性333例(MRI-)。UCH-L1 POC在损伤后0 - 8 h的CT +与CT-诊断中表现最佳,AUC为0.779[0.708 - 0.850],而0 - 25 h的AUC为0.684[0.655-0.712]。NSE检测在0-8 h的AUC为0.695[0.619-0.770],在0-25 h的AUC为0.634[0.603-0.665]。在损伤后的前8个月,POC UCH-L1在识别TBI患者的神经影像学结构异常方面优于NSE。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic performance of point-of-care ubiquitin carboxy-terminal Hydrolase-L1 assay in distinguishing imaging abnormalities in traumatic brain injury: A TRACK-TBI cohort study

The use of UCH-L1 detection with point-of-care (POC) assay alone has not been characterized for clinical use. This study compares the accuracies of POC UCH-L1 and Neuron-Specific Enolase (NSE) Elecsys® levels for identifying TBI patients with structural abnormalities on neuroimaging.

The Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury (TRACK-TBI) Phase 1 Cohort, enrolled 1375 TBI patients (GCS 3–15) presenting to one of 18 US Level I trauma centers within 24 h of injury who had an admission head CT; blood samples were collected, along with 122 orthopedic and 209 healthy controls. The TBI cohort consisted of 810 CT-negative (CT-) and 549 CT-positive (CT+) subjects. Of the CT- subjects who had MRIs, 121 were MRI-positive (MRI+) and 333 were MRI-negative (MRI-). UCH-L1 POC showed best diagnostic performance for CT + versus CT-, 0–8 h post-injury with an AUC of 0·779 [0·708–0.850] when compared to the 0–25 h interval, with an AUC of 0.684 [0.655–0.712]. NSE assay has an AUC of 0.695 [0.619–0.770] for the 0–8 h interval and 0.634 [0.603–0.665] for the 0–25 h interval. During the first 8 after injury, POC UCH-L1 outperforms NSE in identifying TBI patients with structural abnormalities on neuroimaging.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in biomarker sciences and technology
Advances in biomarker sciences and technology Biotechnology, Clinical Biochemistry, Molecular Medicine, Public Health and Health Policy
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信