偏度的定价:来自约翰内斯堡证券交易所的证据

IF 1.2 4区 经济学 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE
J. P. Steyn, L. Theart
{"title":"偏度的定价:来自约翰内斯堡证券交易所的证据","authors":"J. P. Steyn, L. Theart","doi":"10.1080/10293523.2021.1898744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The historical skewness of stock return distributions could potentially affect future stock returns. Previous studies in developed markets have shown that investors prefer shares exhibiting positively skewed or ‘lottery-like’ payoff profiles. The higher demand for these shares results in a negative relationship between skewness and expected stock returns. This study investigates the extent to which asymmetrical returns are priced on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange over the period August 2002 to December 2019. Using portfolio-level analysis, this study analyses the returns of quintile portfolios sorted on past self-skewness. Risk-adjusted returns are evaluated against an equally weighted benchmark. In addition, the presence of a monotonic relationship between past self-skewness and future returns is tested with the monotonic relation test of Patton and Timmermann (2010), as well as the Wolak (1987, 1989) test. Unlike the developed market evidence, this study finds evidence of a positive relationship between past self-skewness and future returns on the JSE. This effect remains even after controlling for size and industry effects. The results suggest that positive skewness is rewarded on a risk-adjusted basis. Overall, the study provides insights for investors regarding the importance of considering the past asymmetry of stock return distributions in investment decision-making processes.","PeriodicalId":44496,"journal":{"name":"Investment Analysts Journal","volume":"50 1","pages":"133 - 144"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10293523.2021.1898744","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The pricing of skewness: Evidence from the Johannesburg Stock Exchange\",\"authors\":\"J. P. Steyn, L. Theart\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10293523.2021.1898744\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The historical skewness of stock return distributions could potentially affect future stock returns. Previous studies in developed markets have shown that investors prefer shares exhibiting positively skewed or ‘lottery-like’ payoff profiles. The higher demand for these shares results in a negative relationship between skewness and expected stock returns. This study investigates the extent to which asymmetrical returns are priced on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange over the period August 2002 to December 2019. Using portfolio-level analysis, this study analyses the returns of quintile portfolios sorted on past self-skewness. Risk-adjusted returns are evaluated against an equally weighted benchmark. In addition, the presence of a monotonic relationship between past self-skewness and future returns is tested with the monotonic relation test of Patton and Timmermann (2010), as well as the Wolak (1987, 1989) test. Unlike the developed market evidence, this study finds evidence of a positive relationship between past self-skewness and future returns on the JSE. This effect remains even after controlling for size and industry effects. The results suggest that positive skewness is rewarded on a risk-adjusted basis. Overall, the study provides insights for investors regarding the importance of considering the past asymmetry of stock return distributions in investment decision-making processes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44496,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Investment Analysts Journal\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"133 - 144\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10293523.2021.1898744\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Investment Analysts Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10293523.2021.1898744\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investment Analysts Journal","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10293523.2021.1898744","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

股票收益分布的历史偏性可能会影响未来的股票收益。此前对发达市场的研究表明,投资者更喜欢表现出正向倾斜或“像彩票一样”收益的股票。对这些股票的较高需求导致偏度与预期股票收益之间呈负相关。本研究调查了2002年8月至2019年12月期间约翰内斯堡证券交易所的不对称收益定价的程度。本文采用组合水平分析方法,分析了按过去自偏性排序的五分位数组合的收益。风险调整后的回报是根据一个同等加权的基准来评估的。此外,通过Patton和Timmermann(2010)的单调关系检验以及Wolak(1987、1989)的单调关系检验,过去自我偏度与未来收益之间是否存在单调关系。与发达市场的证据不同,本研究发现了JSE过去自我偏度与未来回报之间存在正相关关系的证据。即使在控制了规模和行业效应之后,这种效应仍然存在。结果表明,积极的偏度在风险调整的基础上得到奖励。总体而言,该研究为投资者提供了关于在投资决策过程中考虑过去股票收益分布不对称的重要性的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The pricing of skewness: Evidence from the Johannesburg Stock Exchange
ABSTRACT The historical skewness of stock return distributions could potentially affect future stock returns. Previous studies in developed markets have shown that investors prefer shares exhibiting positively skewed or ‘lottery-like’ payoff profiles. The higher demand for these shares results in a negative relationship between skewness and expected stock returns. This study investigates the extent to which asymmetrical returns are priced on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange over the period August 2002 to December 2019. Using portfolio-level analysis, this study analyses the returns of quintile portfolios sorted on past self-skewness. Risk-adjusted returns are evaluated against an equally weighted benchmark. In addition, the presence of a monotonic relationship between past self-skewness and future returns is tested with the monotonic relation test of Patton and Timmermann (2010), as well as the Wolak (1987, 1989) test. Unlike the developed market evidence, this study finds evidence of a positive relationship between past self-skewness and future returns on the JSE. This effect remains even after controlling for size and industry effects. The results suggest that positive skewness is rewarded on a risk-adjusted basis. Overall, the study provides insights for investors regarding the importance of considering the past asymmetry of stock return distributions in investment decision-making processes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Investment Analysts Journal
Investment Analysts Journal BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: The Investment Analysts Journal is an international, peer-reviewed journal, publishing high-quality, original research three times a year. The journal publishes significant new research in finance and investments and seeks to establish a balance between theoretical and empirical studies. Papers written in any areas of finance, investment, accounting and economics will be considered for publication. All contributions are welcome but are subject to an objective selection procedure to ensure that published articles answer the criteria of scientific objectivity, importance and replicability. Readability and good writing style are important. No articles which have been published or are under review elsewhere will be considered. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor, and, if found suitable for further consideration, to peer review by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is double blind and submission is via email. Accepted papers will then pass through originality checking software. The editors reserve the right to make the final decision with respect to publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信