双语者在前瞻性记忆方面有优势吗?

IF 1.2 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Asli Yoruk, Mevla Yahya, Banu Cangoz-Tavat
{"title":"双语者在前瞻性记忆方面有优势吗?","authors":"Asli Yoruk, Mevla Yahya, Banu Cangoz-Tavat","doi":"10.1080/20445911.2022.2159964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT It is well established that bilinguals outperform monolinguals on executive function tasks. However, the effects of bilingualism on prospective memory (PM), which also requires executive functions, have not been investigated vastly. This study aimed to compare bi and monolingual participants’ PM performance in focal and non-focal PM tasks. Forty-eight Turkish-English bilinguals and forty-eight Turkish monolinguals, between the ages of 18–30, were instructed to remember responding to rarely appearing PM cues while engaged in an ongoing task. In the focal PM task, the ongoing task facilitated the processing of the PM cue, whereas the non-focal PM task impeded. The results showed no direct evidence for a bilingual advantage in PM. Moreover, the results showed a reversed effect of PM cue's focality on the ongoing task performance. These findings raise skepticism about the literature's prevalent findings and theoretical explanations. Alternative interpretations are discussed within bilingual advantage and PM theories research areas.","PeriodicalId":47483,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognitive Psychology","volume":"35 1","pages":"255 - 270"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do bilinguals have an advantage in prospective memory?\",\"authors\":\"Asli Yoruk, Mevla Yahya, Banu Cangoz-Tavat\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20445911.2022.2159964\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT It is well established that bilinguals outperform monolinguals on executive function tasks. However, the effects of bilingualism on prospective memory (PM), which also requires executive functions, have not been investigated vastly. This study aimed to compare bi and monolingual participants’ PM performance in focal and non-focal PM tasks. Forty-eight Turkish-English bilinguals and forty-eight Turkish monolinguals, between the ages of 18–30, were instructed to remember responding to rarely appearing PM cues while engaged in an ongoing task. In the focal PM task, the ongoing task facilitated the processing of the PM cue, whereas the non-focal PM task impeded. The results showed no direct evidence for a bilingual advantage in PM. Moreover, the results showed a reversed effect of PM cue's focality on the ongoing task performance. These findings raise skepticism about the literature's prevalent findings and theoretical explanations. Alternative interpretations are discussed within bilingual advantage and PM theories research areas.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cognitive Psychology\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"255 - 270\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cognitive Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2022.2159964\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cognitive Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2022.2159964","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要众所周知,双语者在执行功能任务方面优于单语者。然而,双语对前瞻性记忆(PM)的影响,也需要执行功能,尚未得到广泛的研究。本研究旨在比较双语和单语参与者在焦点和非焦点PM任务中的PM表现。年龄在18-30岁之间的48名土耳其语-英语双语者和48名土耳其语单语者被要求在进行任务时记住对很少出现的PM提示的反应。在焦点PM任务中,正在进行的任务促进了PM线索的处理,而非焦点PM任务阻碍了处理。研究结果表明,PM中的双语优势没有直接证据。此外,研究结果表明PM线索的专注性对正在进行的任务表现有相反的影响。这些发现引起了人们对文献中普遍存在的发现和理论解释的怀疑。在双语优势和PM理论研究领域内讨论了替代解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do bilinguals have an advantage in prospective memory?
ABSTRACT It is well established that bilinguals outperform monolinguals on executive function tasks. However, the effects of bilingualism on prospective memory (PM), which also requires executive functions, have not been investigated vastly. This study aimed to compare bi and monolingual participants’ PM performance in focal and non-focal PM tasks. Forty-eight Turkish-English bilinguals and forty-eight Turkish monolinguals, between the ages of 18–30, were instructed to remember responding to rarely appearing PM cues while engaged in an ongoing task. In the focal PM task, the ongoing task facilitated the processing of the PM cue, whereas the non-focal PM task impeded. The results showed no direct evidence for a bilingual advantage in PM. Moreover, the results showed a reversed effect of PM cue's focality on the ongoing task performance. These findings raise skepticism about the literature's prevalent findings and theoretical explanations. Alternative interpretations are discussed within bilingual advantage and PM theories research areas.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cognitive Psychology
Journal of Cognitive Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
54
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信