为提高鸟类标本的科学价值而修订的鸟皮制备方法

IF 0.5 4区 农林科学 Q4 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
J. Carrillo-Ortiz, Santi Guallar, Jessica Martínez-Vargas, J. Quesada
{"title":"为提高鸟类标本的科学价值而修订的鸟皮制备方法","authors":"J. Carrillo-Ortiz, Santi Guallar, Jessica Martínez-Vargas, J. Quesada","doi":"10.1177/1758155920987151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The methods used to preserve bird skins in museums have a potentially crucial impact on the feasibility and use of these specimens as a source of biological knowledge, although this subject is rarely broached. Study skins of birds are usually prepared with folded wings and straight legs to facilitate storage in the collection; yet, this method can hamper the measurement and examination of certain important features such as wing-feather moult. To make consultation easier for ornithologists, alternative preparation methods such as the splitting of wings and tarsi from the rest of the animal have been proposed by curators. Our aim was to study whether or not preparing bird specimens with spread limbs makes consultation simpler. First, we used two different methods to prepare two specimens each of two common European passerine species: (1) ‘traditional’ (folded wings and straight tarsi) and (2) ‘spread’ (limbs spread on one side of the body). Then, we asked 22 experienced ornithologists to identify moult limits and take three biometric measurements (wing chord, length of the third primary feather and tarsus length) from all four specimens. Subsequently, we asked which preparation method they preferred for obtaining data. The ‘spread’ preparation was preferred for moult, third primary feather length and tarsus length, whilst the ‘traditional’ preparation was preferred for wing chord. Data obtained from the folded and spread preparations were very highly repeatable within each method but only moderately to highly repeatable between methods. One of the handicaps with the ‘spread’ preparation is the increase in storage space required, a factor that should be taken into account before it is employed. Nevertheless, this specimen preparation technique can greatly facilitate consultation and therefore improve the scientific value of ornithological collections.","PeriodicalId":55408,"journal":{"name":"Avian Biology Research","volume":"14 1","pages":"48 - 54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1758155920987151","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A revision of bird skin preparation aimed at improving the scientific value of ornithological collections\",\"authors\":\"J. Carrillo-Ortiz, Santi Guallar, Jessica Martínez-Vargas, J. Quesada\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1758155920987151\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The methods used to preserve bird skins in museums have a potentially crucial impact on the feasibility and use of these specimens as a source of biological knowledge, although this subject is rarely broached. Study skins of birds are usually prepared with folded wings and straight legs to facilitate storage in the collection; yet, this method can hamper the measurement and examination of certain important features such as wing-feather moult. To make consultation easier for ornithologists, alternative preparation methods such as the splitting of wings and tarsi from the rest of the animal have been proposed by curators. Our aim was to study whether or not preparing bird specimens with spread limbs makes consultation simpler. First, we used two different methods to prepare two specimens each of two common European passerine species: (1) ‘traditional’ (folded wings and straight tarsi) and (2) ‘spread’ (limbs spread on one side of the body). Then, we asked 22 experienced ornithologists to identify moult limits and take three biometric measurements (wing chord, length of the third primary feather and tarsus length) from all four specimens. Subsequently, we asked which preparation method they preferred for obtaining data. The ‘spread’ preparation was preferred for moult, third primary feather length and tarsus length, whilst the ‘traditional’ preparation was preferred for wing chord. Data obtained from the folded and spread preparations were very highly repeatable within each method but only moderately to highly repeatable between methods. One of the handicaps with the ‘spread’ preparation is the increase in storage space required, a factor that should be taken into account before it is employed. Nevertheless, this specimen preparation technique can greatly facilitate consultation and therefore improve the scientific value of ornithological collections.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Avian Biology Research\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"48 - 54\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1758155920987151\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Avian Biology Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1758155920987151\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Avian Biology Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1758155920987151","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

博物馆中用于保存鸟皮的方法对这些标本作为生物学知识来源的可行性和使用具有潜在的关键影响,尽管这一主题很少被提及。鸟类的研究皮通常是用折叠的翅膀和笔直的腿来准备的,以便于收藏;然而,这种方法可能会阻碍对某些重要特征(如翅膀羽毛蜕皮)的测量和检查。为了让鸟类学家更容易进行咨询,策展人提出了其他准备方法,如从动物的其他部位分离翅膀和跗骨。我们的目的是研究准备四肢张开的鸟类标本是否会简化咨询。首先,我们使用两种不同的方法制备了两个标本,每个标本都是两种常见的欧洲雀形目物种:(1)“传统”(折叠的翅膀和直的跗骨)和(2)“展开”(四肢展开在身体的一侧)。然后,我们请了22位经验丰富的鸟类学家来确定蜕皮界限,并从所有四个标本中进行了三次生物特征测量(翼弦、第三根初级羽毛的长度和跗骨的长度)。随后,我们询问他们更喜欢哪种制备方法来获取数据。蜕皮、第三初级羽毛长度和跗骨长度首选“展开”制备,而翼弦首选“传统”制备。从折叠和展开制剂获得的数据在每种方法中都具有非常高的可重复性,但在方法之间仅具有中等到高度的可重复。“分散”准备的障碍之一是所需存储空间的增加,这是在使用之前应该考虑的因素。然而,这种标本制备技术可以极大地促进咨询,从而提高鸟类学收藏的科学价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A revision of bird skin preparation aimed at improving the scientific value of ornithological collections
The methods used to preserve bird skins in museums have a potentially crucial impact on the feasibility and use of these specimens as a source of biological knowledge, although this subject is rarely broached. Study skins of birds are usually prepared with folded wings and straight legs to facilitate storage in the collection; yet, this method can hamper the measurement and examination of certain important features such as wing-feather moult. To make consultation easier for ornithologists, alternative preparation methods such as the splitting of wings and tarsi from the rest of the animal have been proposed by curators. Our aim was to study whether or not preparing bird specimens with spread limbs makes consultation simpler. First, we used two different methods to prepare two specimens each of two common European passerine species: (1) ‘traditional’ (folded wings and straight tarsi) and (2) ‘spread’ (limbs spread on one side of the body). Then, we asked 22 experienced ornithologists to identify moult limits and take three biometric measurements (wing chord, length of the third primary feather and tarsus length) from all four specimens. Subsequently, we asked which preparation method they preferred for obtaining data. The ‘spread’ preparation was preferred for moult, third primary feather length and tarsus length, whilst the ‘traditional’ preparation was preferred for wing chord. Data obtained from the folded and spread preparations were very highly repeatable within each method but only moderately to highly repeatable between methods. One of the handicaps with the ‘spread’ preparation is the increase in storage space required, a factor that should be taken into account before it is employed. Nevertheless, this specimen preparation technique can greatly facilitate consultation and therefore improve the scientific value of ornithological collections.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Avian Biology Research
Avian Biology Research 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Avian Biology Research provides a forum for the publication of research in every field of ornithology. It covers all aspects of pure and applied ornithology for wild or captive species as well as research that does not readily fit within the publication objectives of other ornithological journals. By considering a wide range of research fields for publication, Avian Biology Research provides a forum for people working in every field of ornithology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信