算法认识论和方法论:算法危害、算法关怀和情境算法知识

IF 6.3 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Sophia Maalsen
{"title":"算法认识论和方法论:算法危害、算法关怀和情境算法知识","authors":"Sophia Maalsen","doi":"10.1177/03091325221149439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Algorithms have been the focus of important geographical critique, particularly in relation to their harmful and discriminatory effects. However, less attention has been paid to engaging more deeply with the epistemological effects of algorithms, the result being that geographers continue to overlook more generative algorithmic potentials, practices, epistemes and methodologies. This paper progresses our engagements with algorithms by first considering practices of care as a means to reframe our relationship with algorithms. Second, the paper identifies an epistemological rupture that allows us to reconceptualise algorithms as co-researchers, enabling us to encounter new spaces and understand these spaces in new ways.","PeriodicalId":48403,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Human Geography","volume":"47 1","pages":"197 - 214"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Algorithmic epistemologies and methodologies: Algorithmic harm, algorithmic care and situated algorithmic knowledges\",\"authors\":\"Sophia Maalsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03091325221149439\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Algorithms have been the focus of important geographical critique, particularly in relation to their harmful and discriminatory effects. However, less attention has been paid to engaging more deeply with the epistemological effects of algorithms, the result being that geographers continue to overlook more generative algorithmic potentials, practices, epistemes and methodologies. This paper progresses our engagements with algorithms by first considering practices of care as a means to reframe our relationship with algorithms. Second, the paper identifies an epistemological rupture that allows us to reconceptualise algorithms as co-researchers, enabling us to encounter new spaces and understand these spaces in new ways.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48403,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in Human Geography\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"197 - 214\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in Human Geography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03091325221149439\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Human Geography","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03091325221149439","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

算法一直是重要的地理批判的焦点,尤其是在其有害和歧视性影响方面。然而,人们很少关注更深入地参与算法的认识论效应,结果是地理学家继续忽视更具生成性的算法潜力、实践、认识论和方法论。本文首先将护理实践视为重塑我们与算法关系的一种手段,以此来推进我们与算法的互动。其次,本文确定了一种认识论断裂,使我们能够将算法重新定义为共同研究者,使我们能遇到新的空间,并以新的方式理解这些空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Algorithmic epistemologies and methodologies: Algorithmic harm, algorithmic care and situated algorithmic knowledges
Algorithms have been the focus of important geographical critique, particularly in relation to their harmful and discriminatory effects. However, less attention has been paid to engaging more deeply with the epistemological effects of algorithms, the result being that geographers continue to overlook more generative algorithmic potentials, practices, epistemes and methodologies. This paper progresses our engagements with algorithms by first considering practices of care as a means to reframe our relationship with algorithms. Second, the paper identifies an epistemological rupture that allows us to reconceptualise algorithms as co-researchers, enabling us to encounter new spaces and understand these spaces in new ways.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.40
自引率
7.00%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: Progress in Human Geography is the peer-review journal of choice for those wanting to know about the state of the art in all areas of research in the field of human geography - philosophical, theoretical, thematic, methodological or empirical. Concerned primarily with critical reviews of current research, PiHG enables a space for debate about questions, concepts and findings of formative influence in human geography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信