Atad实施的关键审查:Atad在意大利的实施

IF 1.2 Q2 LAW
Intertax Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.54648/taxi2022050
P. Arginelli
{"title":"Atad实施的关键审查:Atad在意大利的实施","authors":"P. Arginelli","doi":"10.54648/taxi2022050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of the present contribution is to pinpoint the specificities of the Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive (ATAD) implementation rules in Italy, with a particular regard to the exercise of the different options provided by the Directive. That implementation has mainly taken the form of amendments to existing provisions (re Controlled foreign company (CFC), exit tax, interest deduction) with only a completely new set of rules (hybrid mismatch arrangements). For the general anti-abuse rule, the choice made has been to regard that rule as substantially overlapping with the Italian general anti-abuse rule (GAAR) and, therefore, not requiring any specific implementation. The result of this approach has been that taxpayers, tax authorities, and courts have been sledging comfortably into the new regimes without any significant discontinuity with the past, except for the hybrid mismatch regulation. In addition, the way in which Italy implemented the ATAD has proved rather conservative and appears largely compliant with the Directive. That notwithstanding, the most relevant departures from the ATAD are highlighted and discussed with a view to establish their compatibility with the EU legal order. Finally, the contribution examines the possible consequences stemming from the technique adopted to implement the Directive general anti-abuse rule and scrutinises the areas where tax litigations could more easily occur in the future.\nATAD, CFC, hybrid mismatch arrangements, interest limitation rule, exit tax, CJEU, GAAR, abuse of tax law, EU law, Italy","PeriodicalId":45365,"journal":{"name":"Intertax","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Critical Review Of The Atad Implementation: The Implementation of the ATAD in Italy\",\"authors\":\"P. Arginelli\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/taxi2022050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective of the present contribution is to pinpoint the specificities of the Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive (ATAD) implementation rules in Italy, with a particular regard to the exercise of the different options provided by the Directive. That implementation has mainly taken the form of amendments to existing provisions (re Controlled foreign company (CFC), exit tax, interest deduction) with only a completely new set of rules (hybrid mismatch arrangements). For the general anti-abuse rule, the choice made has been to regard that rule as substantially overlapping with the Italian general anti-abuse rule (GAAR) and, therefore, not requiring any specific implementation. The result of this approach has been that taxpayers, tax authorities, and courts have been sledging comfortably into the new regimes without any significant discontinuity with the past, except for the hybrid mismatch regulation. In addition, the way in which Italy implemented the ATAD has proved rather conservative and appears largely compliant with the Directive. That notwithstanding, the most relevant departures from the ATAD are highlighted and discussed with a view to establish their compatibility with the EU legal order. Finally, the contribution examines the possible consequences stemming from the technique adopted to implement the Directive general anti-abuse rule and scrutinises the areas where tax litigations could more easily occur in the future.\\nATAD, CFC, hybrid mismatch arrangements, interest limitation rule, exit tax, CJEU, GAAR, abuse of tax law, EU law, Italy\",\"PeriodicalId\":45365,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intertax\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intertax\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/taxi2022050\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intertax","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/taxi2022050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本贡献的目的是查明意大利反避税指令(ATAD)实施规则的特殊性,特别是关于指令提供的不同选择的行使。实施的主要形式是对现有条款(重新控制外国公司(CFC)、出口税、利息扣除)进行修订,只有一套全新的规则(混合错配安排)。对于一般反滥用规则,所作的选择是认为该规则与意大利一般反滥用规则(GAAR)有很大的重叠,因此不需要任何具体的执行。这种做法的结果是,纳税人、税务机关和法院一直在轻松地适应新制度,除了混合错配监管外,与过去没有任何明显的不连续性。此外,意大利实施ATAD的方式已被证明相当保守,似乎在很大程度上符合指令。尽管如此,强调并讨论了与ATAD最相关的背离,以确定其与欧盟法律秩序的兼容性。最后,该贡献审查了实施指令一般反滥用规则所采用的技术可能产生的后果,并审查了将来更容易发生税务诉讼的领域。ATAD, CFC,混合错配安排,利益限制规则,出口税,欧盟,GAAR,税法滥用,欧盟法,意大利
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Critical Review Of The Atad Implementation: The Implementation of the ATAD in Italy
The objective of the present contribution is to pinpoint the specificities of the Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive (ATAD) implementation rules in Italy, with a particular regard to the exercise of the different options provided by the Directive. That implementation has mainly taken the form of amendments to existing provisions (re Controlled foreign company (CFC), exit tax, interest deduction) with only a completely new set of rules (hybrid mismatch arrangements). For the general anti-abuse rule, the choice made has been to regard that rule as substantially overlapping with the Italian general anti-abuse rule (GAAR) and, therefore, not requiring any specific implementation. The result of this approach has been that taxpayers, tax authorities, and courts have been sledging comfortably into the new regimes without any significant discontinuity with the past, except for the hybrid mismatch regulation. In addition, the way in which Italy implemented the ATAD has proved rather conservative and appears largely compliant with the Directive. That notwithstanding, the most relevant departures from the ATAD are highlighted and discussed with a view to establish their compatibility with the EU legal order. Finally, the contribution examines the possible consequences stemming from the technique adopted to implement the Directive general anti-abuse rule and scrutinises the areas where tax litigations could more easily occur in the future. ATAD, CFC, hybrid mismatch arrangements, interest limitation rule, exit tax, CJEU, GAAR, abuse of tax law, EU law, Italy
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Intertax
Intertax LAW-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
50.00%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信