住院护理中治疗尿失禁的干预措施:综述

K. Farrell, Akke Vellinga
{"title":"住院护理中治疗尿失禁的干预措施:综述","authors":"K. Farrell, Akke Vellinga","doi":"10.23937/2469-5858/1510078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Urinary incontinence (UI) is highly prevalent in elderly people residing in nursing homes. Care staff often lack the knowledge and management skills to effectively care for and treat residents with UI. The implementation of standardised treatment interventions at the individual or nursing home level can help to successfully manage and reduce UI in elderly residents. Aim: Review intervention studies evaluating the effectiveness of different treatment interventions in managing and improving UI in residential care. Data sources: MEDLINE and PubMed were searched from 2005-2019 using selective search strategies, detailing interventions and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in residential care and nursing homes, focusing on elderly people. Pharmacological and surgical interventions were excluded. The search was limited to studies published in the English language. Methods: A narrative review of studies aimed at reducing UI and improving continence in nursing home residents. Results: 10 studies were identified that reported on interventions to improve continence care, and reduce UI with behavioural and conservative approaches for residents and/ or educational training for staff. Assessment of UI varied widely in each study from recording of prompt voiding and frequency, electronic devices, diary assessment, support and motivation from care staff, to quality of life. None of the studies could be compared on intervention effectiveness in terms of outcome and assessment. Conclusions and implications: Even though all studies reported some sort of improvement of UI, no comparisons can be made between studies. A core outcome set would be of great benefit to standardise the assessment and allow comparison of intervention effectiveness of UI in elderly.","PeriodicalId":91314,"journal":{"name":"Journal of geriatric medicine and gerontology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interventions for Treating Urinary Incontinence in Residential Care: A Narrative Review\",\"authors\":\"K. Farrell, Akke Vellinga\",\"doi\":\"10.23937/2469-5858/1510078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Urinary incontinence (UI) is highly prevalent in elderly people residing in nursing homes. Care staff often lack the knowledge and management skills to effectively care for and treat residents with UI. The implementation of standardised treatment interventions at the individual or nursing home level can help to successfully manage and reduce UI in elderly residents. Aim: Review intervention studies evaluating the effectiveness of different treatment interventions in managing and improving UI in residential care. Data sources: MEDLINE and PubMed were searched from 2005-2019 using selective search strategies, detailing interventions and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in residential care and nursing homes, focusing on elderly people. Pharmacological and surgical interventions were excluded. The search was limited to studies published in the English language. Methods: A narrative review of studies aimed at reducing UI and improving continence in nursing home residents. Results: 10 studies were identified that reported on interventions to improve continence care, and reduce UI with behavioural and conservative approaches for residents and/ or educational training for staff. Assessment of UI varied widely in each study from recording of prompt voiding and frequency, electronic devices, diary assessment, support and motivation from care staff, to quality of life. None of the studies could be compared on intervention effectiveness in terms of outcome and assessment. Conclusions and implications: Even though all studies reported some sort of improvement of UI, no comparisons can be made between studies. A core outcome set would be of great benefit to standardise the assessment and allow comparison of intervention effectiveness of UI in elderly.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91314,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of geriatric medicine and gerontology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of geriatric medicine and gerontology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23937/2469-5858/1510078\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of geriatric medicine and gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23937/2469-5858/1510078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尿失禁(UI)在养老院的老年人中非常普遍。护理人员往往缺乏有效护理和治疗UI患者的知识和管理技能。在个人或疗养院层面实施标准化治疗干预措施有助于成功管理和减少老年居民的UI。目的:回顾干预研究,评估不同治疗干预措施在管理和改善住院护理UI方面的有效性。数据来源:MEDLINE和PubMed从2005-2019年开始使用选择性搜索策略进行搜索,详细介绍了住院护理和疗养院的干预措施和随机对照试验(RCT),重点关注老年人。排除药理学和外科干预。搜索仅限于以英语发表的研究。方法:对旨在减少疗养院居民UI和改善失禁的研究进行叙述性综述。结果:确定了10项研究,报告了通过对居民的行为和保守方法和/或对工作人员的教育培训来改善失禁护理和减少UI的干预措施。在每项研究中,对UI的评估差异很大,从及时排尿的记录和频率、电子设备、日记评估、护理人员的支持和激励,到生活质量。没有一项研究可以从结果和评估的角度对干预效果进行比较。结论和意义:尽管所有研究都报告了UI的某种改善,但无法在研究之间进行比较。核心结果集将对标准化评估和比较老年人UI的干预效果大有裨益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interventions for Treating Urinary Incontinence in Residential Care: A Narrative Review
Background: Urinary incontinence (UI) is highly prevalent in elderly people residing in nursing homes. Care staff often lack the knowledge and management skills to effectively care for and treat residents with UI. The implementation of standardised treatment interventions at the individual or nursing home level can help to successfully manage and reduce UI in elderly residents. Aim: Review intervention studies evaluating the effectiveness of different treatment interventions in managing and improving UI in residential care. Data sources: MEDLINE and PubMed were searched from 2005-2019 using selective search strategies, detailing interventions and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in residential care and nursing homes, focusing on elderly people. Pharmacological and surgical interventions were excluded. The search was limited to studies published in the English language. Methods: A narrative review of studies aimed at reducing UI and improving continence in nursing home residents. Results: 10 studies were identified that reported on interventions to improve continence care, and reduce UI with behavioural and conservative approaches for residents and/ or educational training for staff. Assessment of UI varied widely in each study from recording of prompt voiding and frequency, electronic devices, diary assessment, support and motivation from care staff, to quality of life. None of the studies could be compared on intervention effectiveness in terms of outcome and assessment. Conclusions and implications: Even though all studies reported some sort of improvement of UI, no comparisons can be made between studies. A core outcome set would be of great benefit to standardise the assessment and allow comparison of intervention effectiveness of UI in elderly.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信