Corey Peltier, Mindy E. Lingo, Faye A. Autry, Malarie E. Deardorff, Maegann Palacios
{"title":"在常规条件下实现的基于模式的指令","authors":"Corey Peltier, Mindy E. Lingo, Faye A. Autry, Malarie E. Deardorff, Maegann Palacios","doi":"10.1080/15377903.2020.1821273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Many students identified with a specific learning disability (SLD) experience difficulty with mathematical problem solving. Schema-based instruction (SBI) is identified as a promising practice for students with a SLD. The current projects aimed to tests the efficacy of SBI implemented by a teacher under routine conditions. This extends prior literature by (a) using a teacher as the implementer, (b) allowing flexibility in the intervention protocol, (c) condensing the duration of intervention sessions, and (d) providing instruction in small group settings. In addition, we measured student problem solving performance on word problems requiring two-steps. We used a multiple-probe design across three groups of fifth-grade participants (n = 7) receiving supplemental instruction in a resource room setting. Results indicated a functional relation between SBI and problem-solving performance on one-step word problems. However, the magnitude of change and consistency in performance varied across participants. Student performance on two-step word problems embedded within one structure and combined structures was low. The NAP, Tau, LRRi, and BC-SMD effect sizes were used to quantify effects. Implications are discussed in regard to systematic replication and conditions that may impact fidelity.","PeriodicalId":46345,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied School Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15377903.2020.1821273","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Schema-Based Instruction Implemented under Routine Conditions\",\"authors\":\"Corey Peltier, Mindy E. Lingo, Faye A. Autry, Malarie E. Deardorff, Maegann Palacios\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15377903.2020.1821273\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Many students identified with a specific learning disability (SLD) experience difficulty with mathematical problem solving. Schema-based instruction (SBI) is identified as a promising practice for students with a SLD. The current projects aimed to tests the efficacy of SBI implemented by a teacher under routine conditions. This extends prior literature by (a) using a teacher as the implementer, (b) allowing flexibility in the intervention protocol, (c) condensing the duration of intervention sessions, and (d) providing instruction in small group settings. In addition, we measured student problem solving performance on word problems requiring two-steps. We used a multiple-probe design across three groups of fifth-grade participants (n = 7) receiving supplemental instruction in a resource room setting. Results indicated a functional relation between SBI and problem-solving performance on one-step word problems. However, the magnitude of change and consistency in performance varied across participants. Student performance on two-step word problems embedded within one structure and combined structures was low. The NAP, Tau, LRRi, and BC-SMD effect sizes were used to quantify effects. Implications are discussed in regard to systematic replication and conditions that may impact fidelity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46345,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied School Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15377903.2020.1821273\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied School Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15377903.2020.1821273\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied School Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15377903.2020.1821273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Schema-Based Instruction Implemented under Routine Conditions
Abstract Many students identified with a specific learning disability (SLD) experience difficulty with mathematical problem solving. Schema-based instruction (SBI) is identified as a promising practice for students with a SLD. The current projects aimed to tests the efficacy of SBI implemented by a teacher under routine conditions. This extends prior literature by (a) using a teacher as the implementer, (b) allowing flexibility in the intervention protocol, (c) condensing the duration of intervention sessions, and (d) providing instruction in small group settings. In addition, we measured student problem solving performance on word problems requiring two-steps. We used a multiple-probe design across three groups of fifth-grade participants (n = 7) receiving supplemental instruction in a resource room setting. Results indicated a functional relation between SBI and problem-solving performance on one-step word problems. However, the magnitude of change and consistency in performance varied across participants. Student performance on two-step word problems embedded within one structure and combined structures was low. The NAP, Tau, LRRi, and BC-SMD effect sizes were used to quantify effects. Implications are discussed in regard to systematic replication and conditions that may impact fidelity.
期刊介绍:
With a new publisher (Taylor & Francis) and a new editor (David L. Wodrich), the Journal of Applied School Psychology will continue to publish articles and periodic thematic issues in 2009. Each submission should rest on either solid theoretical or empirical support and provide information that can be used in applied school settings, related educational systems, or community locations in which practitioners work. Manuscripts appropriate for publication in the journal will reflect psychological applications that pertain to individual students, groups of students, teachers, parents, and administrators. The journal also seeks, over time, novel and creative ways in which to disseminate information about practically sound and empirically supported school psychology practice.