中产阶级和郊区:南非废除种族隔离走向非种族主义?

IF 0.8 Q2 AREA STUDIES
R. Southall
{"title":"中产阶级和郊区:南非废除种族隔离走向非种族主义?","authors":"R. Southall","doi":"10.1080/02589001.2022.2083589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT ‘Non-racial democracy’ is an aspirational goal of South Africa’s post-apartheid democracy. Deracialisation of public spheres, notably education and work, has led to high rates of upward social mobility among black South Africans and the increasing racial diversification of the middle class, which under apartheid, had remained overwhelmingly white. Despite the increased racial integration of public life, the majority of South Africans continue to live in mono-racial residential areas. Much of the responsibility for this lies in the legacy of apartheid geography. The legacy of apartheid has entrenched the spatial segregation of the officially defined races and ensured that white suburbs were the most socially advantaged and desirable places in which to live. Today, white suburbs continue to occupy the top rungs of the residential ladder, their privilege protected by the economic costs of entry. Nonetheless, high rates of black upward mobility and aspiration result in increased black entry into these historically white spaces, which are themselves undergoing considerable change in shape and character. As a result, white suburbia constitutes a major site where the struggle for non-racialism is taking place.","PeriodicalId":51744,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary African Studies","volume":"41 1","pages":"60 - 74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The middle class and suburbia: desegregation towards non-racialism in South Africa?\",\"authors\":\"R. Southall\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02589001.2022.2083589\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT ‘Non-racial democracy’ is an aspirational goal of South Africa’s post-apartheid democracy. Deracialisation of public spheres, notably education and work, has led to high rates of upward social mobility among black South Africans and the increasing racial diversification of the middle class, which under apartheid, had remained overwhelmingly white. Despite the increased racial integration of public life, the majority of South Africans continue to live in mono-racial residential areas. Much of the responsibility for this lies in the legacy of apartheid geography. The legacy of apartheid has entrenched the spatial segregation of the officially defined races and ensured that white suburbs were the most socially advantaged and desirable places in which to live. Today, white suburbs continue to occupy the top rungs of the residential ladder, their privilege protected by the economic costs of entry. Nonetheless, high rates of black upward mobility and aspiration result in increased black entry into these historically white spaces, which are themselves undergoing considerable change in shape and character. As a result, white suburbia constitutes a major site where the struggle for non-racialism is taking place.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Contemporary African Studies\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"60 - 74\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Contemporary African Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02589001.2022.2083589\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary African Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02589001.2022.2083589","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要“非种族民主”是南非后种族隔离民主的理想目标。公共领域,特别是教育和工作领域的非社会化,导致南非黑人的社会流动率很高,中产阶级的种族多元化程度也在增加,而在种族隔离制度下,中产阶级绝大多数是白人。尽管公共生活中的种族融合程度有所提高,但大多数南非人仍然生活在单一种族的居住区。造成这种情况的大部分责任在于种族隔离地理的遗留问题。种族隔离的遗产巩固了官方定义的种族的空间隔离,并确保白人郊区是最具社会优势和最理想的居住场所。如今,白人郊区继续占据着住宅阶梯的顶端,他们的特权受到进入的经济成本的保护。尽管如此,黑人向上流动和渴望的比率很高,导致黑人越来越多地进入这些历史上的白人空间,而这些空间本身正在经历形状和性格的巨大变化。因此,白人郊区成为非种族主义斗争的主要场所。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The middle class and suburbia: desegregation towards non-racialism in South Africa?
ABSTRACT ‘Non-racial democracy’ is an aspirational goal of South Africa’s post-apartheid democracy. Deracialisation of public spheres, notably education and work, has led to high rates of upward social mobility among black South Africans and the increasing racial diversification of the middle class, which under apartheid, had remained overwhelmingly white. Despite the increased racial integration of public life, the majority of South Africans continue to live in mono-racial residential areas. Much of the responsibility for this lies in the legacy of apartheid geography. The legacy of apartheid has entrenched the spatial segregation of the officially defined races and ensured that white suburbs were the most socially advantaged and desirable places in which to live. Today, white suburbs continue to occupy the top rungs of the residential ladder, their privilege protected by the economic costs of entry. Nonetheless, high rates of black upward mobility and aspiration result in increased black entry into these historically white spaces, which are themselves undergoing considerable change in shape and character. As a result, white suburbia constitutes a major site where the struggle for non-racialism is taking place.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Journal of Contemporary African Studies (JCAS) is an interdisciplinary journal seeking to promote an African-centred scholarly understanding of societies on the continent and their location within the global political economy. Its scope extends across a wide range of social science and humanities disciplines with topics covered including, but not limited to, culture, development, education, environmental questions, gender, government, labour, land, leadership, political economy politics, social movements, sociology of knowledge and welfare. JCAS welcomes contributions reviewing general trends in the academic literature with a specific focus on debates and developments in Africa as part of a broader aim of contributing towards the development of viable communities of African scholarship. The journal publishes original research articles, book reviews, notes from the field, debates, research reports and occasional review essays. It also publishes special issues and welcomes proposals for new topics. JCAS is published four times a year, in January, April, July and October.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信