向政府提出要求:南非开普敦后院居民集体行动的决定因素理论化

IF 0.8 2区 社会学 Q2 AREA STUDIES
Adam S. Harris, Andreas Scheba, L. Rice
{"title":"向政府提出要求:南非开普敦后院居民集体行动的决定因素理论化","authors":"Adam S. Harris, Andreas Scheba, L. Rice","doi":"10.1017/asr.2023.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Informality is growing with Africa’s rapid urbanization. Much like residents of other types of informal housing, backyard dwellers face overall poor living conditions and political marginalization. However, backyard residents are in an ambiguous legal area and have been far less politically active and organized to pursue their rights to adequate housing. Using a qualitative case study of backyard residents in three Cape Town neighborhoods, Harris, Scheba, and Rice bridge theories of infrastructural citizenship and collective action to shed light on how informality may undermine collective action, and they identify four factors influencing collective action.","PeriodicalId":7618,"journal":{"name":"African Studies Review","volume":"66 1","pages":"698 - 720"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Making Demands on Government: Theorizing Determinants of Backyard Residents’ Collective Action in Cape Town, South Africa\",\"authors\":\"Adam S. Harris, Andreas Scheba, L. Rice\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/asr.2023.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Informality is growing with Africa’s rapid urbanization. Much like residents of other types of informal housing, backyard dwellers face overall poor living conditions and political marginalization. However, backyard residents are in an ambiguous legal area and have been far less politically active and organized to pursue their rights to adequate housing. Using a qualitative case study of backyard residents in three Cape Town neighborhoods, Harris, Scheba, and Rice bridge theories of infrastructural citizenship and collective action to shed light on how informality may undermine collective action, and they identify four factors influencing collective action.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7618,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African Studies Review\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"698 - 720\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African Studies Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/asr.2023.10\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Studies Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/asr.2023.10","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要非正规性随着非洲快速城市化而增长。与其他类型非正规住房的居民一样,后院居民面临着整体恶劣的生活条件和政治边缘化。然而,后院居民处于一个模糊的法律领域,在追求适足住房权利方面的政治活跃度和组织性要低得多。通过对开普敦三个社区后院居民的定性案例研究,Harris、Scheba和Rice提出了基础设施公民身份和集体行动的桥梁理论,揭示了非正规性如何破坏集体行动,并确定了影响集体行动的四个因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Making Demands on Government: Theorizing Determinants of Backyard Residents’ Collective Action in Cape Town, South Africa
Abstract Informality is growing with Africa’s rapid urbanization. Much like residents of other types of informal housing, backyard dwellers face overall poor living conditions and political marginalization. However, backyard residents are in an ambiguous legal area and have been far less politically active and organized to pursue their rights to adequate housing. Using a qualitative case study of backyard residents in three Cape Town neighborhoods, Harris, Scheba, and Rice bridge theories of infrastructural citizenship and collective action to shed light on how informality may undermine collective action, and they identify four factors influencing collective action.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
African Studies Review
African Studies Review AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
43.80%
发文量
159
期刊介绍: African Studies Review (ASR) is the flagship scholarly journal of the African Studies Association (USA). The ASR publishes the highest quality African studies scholarship in all academic disciplines. The ASR’s rigorous interdisciplinary peer review seeks to contribute to the development of scholarly conversations of interest to the diverse audience of the Association’s membership and to the growth of African studies in North America, on the African continent, and in a global comparative context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信