举重任务中任务因素对心率恢复时间的影响

F. Aghazadeh, Milad Amini
{"title":"举重任务中任务因素对心率恢复时间的影响","authors":"F. Aghazadeh, Milad Amini","doi":"10.3233/OER-170255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: There is an extensive body of research reviewing the effect of task factors on the Maximum Acceptable Weight of Lift (MAWL) or heart beats elevation as a result of a manual material handling task. However, there are now studies that investigate the effect of task factors on the heart rate recovery time (HRR). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was twofold: (1) to determine the HRR for a series of lifting tasks based on the activity heart rate and by using a set of task variables, (2) to compare the effect of three task factors on the HRR following a lifting task. METHODS: This research was constituted of capturing the duration that heart rate needs to get to a steady state following a lifting task, along with conducting the survey of perceived exertion (Borg). Three independent variables of this study (taskfactors) were weight of the lift (10 and 20 kg), frequency of the lift (6 and 9 lifts per minute), and the duration of the lift (5 and 10 minutes). Given the possible treatment combinations, a total of 8 treatments was obtained. Twenty-four university male students performed the lifting tasks in a between-subject design. Each participant performed one treatment by lifting a box from knuckle to shoulder height at a certain frequency, duration and weight. All eight treatments were equally replicated with three observations per treatment group. RESULTS: Increasing weight and frequency of the lift significantly increased the HRR (respectively by 37% and 34%), while the HRR had a slight decrease when duration was doubled (approximately −2.7%). Weight of the lift was the only factor led to a significant change in the perceived difficulty of the task among participants (approximately 20%). CONCLUSIONS: Among main factors, frequency and weight of the lift had a significant effect on the HRR (p-values < 0.1). Among the interaction effects, the interaction of frequency and duration had a significant effect on the HRR. The only factor that had a significant effect on the Borg-rating was weight of the lift (p-value < 0.1).","PeriodicalId":91780,"journal":{"name":"Occupational ergonomics : the journal of the International Society for Occupational Ergonomics and Safety","volume":"13 1","pages":"71-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3233/OER-170255","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of task factors on the heart rate recovery time in a lifting task\",\"authors\":\"F. Aghazadeh, Milad Amini\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/OER-170255\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND: There is an extensive body of research reviewing the effect of task factors on the Maximum Acceptable Weight of Lift (MAWL) or heart beats elevation as a result of a manual material handling task. However, there are now studies that investigate the effect of task factors on the heart rate recovery time (HRR). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was twofold: (1) to determine the HRR for a series of lifting tasks based on the activity heart rate and by using a set of task variables, (2) to compare the effect of three task factors on the HRR following a lifting task. METHODS: This research was constituted of capturing the duration that heart rate needs to get to a steady state following a lifting task, along with conducting the survey of perceived exertion (Borg). Three independent variables of this study (taskfactors) were weight of the lift (10 and 20 kg), frequency of the lift (6 and 9 lifts per minute), and the duration of the lift (5 and 10 minutes). Given the possible treatment combinations, a total of 8 treatments was obtained. Twenty-four university male students performed the lifting tasks in a between-subject design. Each participant performed one treatment by lifting a box from knuckle to shoulder height at a certain frequency, duration and weight. All eight treatments were equally replicated with three observations per treatment group. RESULTS: Increasing weight and frequency of the lift significantly increased the HRR (respectively by 37% and 34%), while the HRR had a slight decrease when duration was doubled (approximately −2.7%). Weight of the lift was the only factor led to a significant change in the perceived difficulty of the task among participants (approximately 20%). CONCLUSIONS: Among main factors, frequency and weight of the lift had a significant effect on the HRR (p-values < 0.1). Among the interaction effects, the interaction of frequency and duration had a significant effect on the HRR. The only factor that had a significant effect on the Borg-rating was weight of the lift (p-value < 0.1).\",\"PeriodicalId\":91780,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Occupational ergonomics : the journal of the International Society for Occupational Ergonomics and Safety\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"71-80\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3233/OER-170255\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Occupational ergonomics : the journal of the International Society for Occupational Ergonomics and Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/OER-170255\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational ergonomics : the journal of the International Society for Occupational Ergonomics and Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/OER-170255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:有大量研究回顾了任务因素对手动材料处理任务导致的最大可接受重量(MAWL)或心跳升高的影响。然而,现在有研究调查任务因素对心率恢复时间(HRR)的影响。目的:本研究的目的有两个:(1)根据活动心率并使用一组任务变量来确定一系列举重任务的HRR;(2)比较三个任务因素对举重任务后HRR的影响。方法:本研究包括捕捉举重任务后心率达到稳定状态所需的持续时间,以及对感知用力(Borg)的调查。本研究的三个自变量(任务因素)是举重重量(10和20公斤)、举重频率(每分钟6和9次)以及举重持续时间(5和10分钟)。考虑到可能的治疗组合,总共获得了8个治疗。24名大学男生在课间设计中完成了举重任务。每个参与者以一定的频率、持续时间和重量将一个箱子从指节举到肩高,进行一次治疗。所有八种治疗方法都同样重复,每个治疗组有三个观察结果。结果:举重重量和频率的增加显著提高了HRR(分别提高了37%和34%),而当持续时间增加一倍时,HRR略有下降(约为-2.7%)。举重重量是导致参与者感知任务难度显著变化的唯一因素(约为20%)。结论:在主要因素中,升力的频率和重量对HRR有显著影响(p值<0.01)。在交互作用中,频率和持续时间的交互作用对HRR影响显著。对Borg评分有显著影响的唯一因素是举重重量(p值<0.01)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of task factors on the heart rate recovery time in a lifting task
BACKGROUND: There is an extensive body of research reviewing the effect of task factors on the Maximum Acceptable Weight of Lift (MAWL) or heart beats elevation as a result of a manual material handling task. However, there are now studies that investigate the effect of task factors on the heart rate recovery time (HRR). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was twofold: (1) to determine the HRR for a series of lifting tasks based on the activity heart rate and by using a set of task variables, (2) to compare the effect of three task factors on the HRR following a lifting task. METHODS: This research was constituted of capturing the duration that heart rate needs to get to a steady state following a lifting task, along with conducting the survey of perceived exertion (Borg). Three independent variables of this study (taskfactors) were weight of the lift (10 and 20 kg), frequency of the lift (6 and 9 lifts per minute), and the duration of the lift (5 and 10 minutes). Given the possible treatment combinations, a total of 8 treatments was obtained. Twenty-four university male students performed the lifting tasks in a between-subject design. Each participant performed one treatment by lifting a box from knuckle to shoulder height at a certain frequency, duration and weight. All eight treatments were equally replicated with three observations per treatment group. RESULTS: Increasing weight and frequency of the lift significantly increased the HRR (respectively by 37% and 34%), while the HRR had a slight decrease when duration was doubled (approximately −2.7%). Weight of the lift was the only factor led to a significant change in the perceived difficulty of the task among participants (approximately 20%). CONCLUSIONS: Among main factors, frequency and weight of the lift had a significant effect on the HRR (p-values < 0.1). Among the interaction effects, the interaction of frequency and duration had a significant effect on the HRR. The only factor that had a significant effect on the Borg-rating was weight of the lift (p-value < 0.1).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信