预测气体偏差因子(z因子)的不同机器学习方法

M. Elsayed, Ahmed Alsabaa, Adel A. S. Salem
{"title":"预测气体偏差因子(z因子)的不同机器学习方法","authors":"M. Elsayed, Ahmed Alsabaa, Adel A. S. Salem","doi":"10.21608/jpme.2023.177642.1145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The gas compressibility factor indicates the gas deviation from ideal gas behavior. Accurate values of gas compressibility factor affect the estimation of reservoir fluid properties, the initial gas in place, and the natural gas production and transportation process. Gas compressibility factor can be estimated in labs; however, this method is expensive and time-consuming. Due to these challenges, numerous studies created various empirical correlations depending on the results of the equation of state. The Standing and Katz chart is regarded as a standard for estimating gas compressibility factor. Many studies proposed approaches and correlations to fit this chart, however some did not cover the entire range of data, others provided implicit methods taking long time for calculation or faced high errors out of the data range. In this study, Support Vector Machine, Radial Basis Function, and Functional Network as machine learning approaches were implemented to predict the gas compressibility factor, based on 5490 data set of Standing and Katz chart. 70% of the data set was implemented in the training process and 30% in the testing process. The data set included pseudo-reduced pressure and pseudo-reduced temperature as inputs and Z-factor as an output. Different training functions were examined for each method for the best approach optimization. In addition, machine learning best approach was compared with other correlations. The best results in this work were obtained from Radial Basis Function with 0.14 average absolute percentage error and 0.99 correlation coefficient. The developed machine learning approach performed better than the examined correlations","PeriodicalId":34437,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Petroleum and Mining Engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Different Machine Learning Approaches to predict Gas Deviation Factor (Z-factor)\",\"authors\":\"M. Elsayed, Ahmed Alsabaa, Adel A. S. Salem\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/jpme.2023.177642.1145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The gas compressibility factor indicates the gas deviation from ideal gas behavior. Accurate values of gas compressibility factor affect the estimation of reservoir fluid properties, the initial gas in place, and the natural gas production and transportation process. Gas compressibility factor can be estimated in labs; however, this method is expensive and time-consuming. Due to these challenges, numerous studies created various empirical correlations depending on the results of the equation of state. The Standing and Katz chart is regarded as a standard for estimating gas compressibility factor. Many studies proposed approaches and correlations to fit this chart, however some did not cover the entire range of data, others provided implicit methods taking long time for calculation or faced high errors out of the data range. In this study, Support Vector Machine, Radial Basis Function, and Functional Network as machine learning approaches were implemented to predict the gas compressibility factor, based on 5490 data set of Standing and Katz chart. 70% of the data set was implemented in the training process and 30% in the testing process. The data set included pseudo-reduced pressure and pseudo-reduced temperature as inputs and Z-factor as an output. Different training functions were examined for each method for the best approach optimization. In addition, machine learning best approach was compared with other correlations. The best results in this work were obtained from Radial Basis Function with 0.14 average absolute percentage error and 0.99 correlation coefficient. The developed machine learning approach performed better than the examined correlations\",\"PeriodicalId\":34437,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Petroleum and Mining Engineering\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Petroleum and Mining Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/jpme.2023.177642.1145\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Petroleum and Mining Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/jpme.2023.177642.1145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

气体压缩系数表示气体与理想气体行为的偏差。气体压缩系数的准确取值影响着储层流体性质的估计、初始气体的就位以及天然气的生产和输送过程。气体压缩系数可在实验室中估算;然而,这种方法既昂贵又耗时。由于这些挑战,许多研究根据状态方程的结果创建了各种经验相关性。斯坦丁和卡茨图被认为是估计气体压缩系数的标准。许多研究提出了拟合该图表的方法和相关性,但有些没有覆盖整个数据范围,有些则提供了计算时间长或数据范围外误差大的隐式方法。本研究采用支持向量机(Support Vector Machine)、径向基函数(Radial Basis Function)和功能网络(Functional Network)作为机器学习方法,基于Standing和Katz图的5490数据集对气体压缩系数进行预测。70%的数据集在训练过程中实现,30%在测试过程中实现。数据集包括伪减压和伪降温作为输入,z因子作为输出。对每种方法进行了不同的训练函数检验,以获得最佳方法优化。此外,机器学习的最佳方法与其他相关性进行了比较。采用径向基函数得到最佳结果,平均绝对百分比误差为0.14,相关系数为0.99。开发的机器学习方法比检验的相关性表现得更好
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Different Machine Learning Approaches to predict Gas Deviation Factor (Z-factor)
The gas compressibility factor indicates the gas deviation from ideal gas behavior. Accurate values of gas compressibility factor affect the estimation of reservoir fluid properties, the initial gas in place, and the natural gas production and transportation process. Gas compressibility factor can be estimated in labs; however, this method is expensive and time-consuming. Due to these challenges, numerous studies created various empirical correlations depending on the results of the equation of state. The Standing and Katz chart is regarded as a standard for estimating gas compressibility factor. Many studies proposed approaches and correlations to fit this chart, however some did not cover the entire range of data, others provided implicit methods taking long time for calculation or faced high errors out of the data range. In this study, Support Vector Machine, Radial Basis Function, and Functional Network as machine learning approaches were implemented to predict the gas compressibility factor, based on 5490 data set of Standing and Katz chart. 70% of the data set was implemented in the training process and 30% in the testing process. The data set included pseudo-reduced pressure and pseudo-reduced temperature as inputs and Z-factor as an output. Different training functions were examined for each method for the best approach optimization. In addition, machine learning best approach was compared with other correlations. The best results in this work were obtained from Radial Basis Function with 0.14 average absolute percentage error and 0.99 correlation coefficient. The developed machine learning approach performed better than the examined correlations
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信