评价阿拉伯语学习课程以改善学术质量

Uswatun Chasanah, Andi Prastowo
{"title":"评价阿拉伯语学习课程以改善学术质量","authors":"Uswatun Chasanah, Andi Prastowo","doi":"10.21274/taalum.2021.9.2.272-299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: The research was conducted to find out the form of instruments used in the evaluation of the Arabic language learning curriculum in MI. This study uses a case study method at MI Mambaul Ma'arif. The research subject of the teacher of Arabic subjects. Data collection techniques with interviews, observations, and documentation studies. The data analysis technique is carried out by inductive analysis techniques. The results revealed that there are four types of curriculum evaluation, namely formative evaluation, summative evaluation, input evaluation, and product evaluation. The instrument forms used are test and nontest. Test instruments are classified into nen types, and twelve types of non-test types. The selection of instrument forms must be following the needs and characteristics of the learners. And teachers have no difficulty in making and implementing these forms of instruments when conducting evaluations either in the form of tests or nontests. If the results shown have not reached the minimum standard, it is necessary to provide follow-up in the form of remedial activities. And if it has reached the minimum standard, enrichment activities may be given.","PeriodicalId":55777,"journal":{"name":"Taallum Jurnal Pendidikan Islam","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EVALUASI KURIKULUM PEMBELAJARAN BAHASA ARAB UNTUK PERBAIKAN MUTU AKADEMIK DI MI MAMBAUL MA’ARIF\",\"authors\":\"Uswatun Chasanah, Andi Prastowo\",\"doi\":\"10.21274/taalum.2021.9.2.272-299\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract: The research was conducted to find out the form of instruments used in the evaluation of the Arabic language learning curriculum in MI. This study uses a case study method at MI Mambaul Ma'arif. The research subject of the teacher of Arabic subjects. Data collection techniques with interviews, observations, and documentation studies. The data analysis technique is carried out by inductive analysis techniques. The results revealed that there are four types of curriculum evaluation, namely formative evaluation, summative evaluation, input evaluation, and product evaluation. The instrument forms used are test and nontest. Test instruments are classified into nen types, and twelve types of non-test types. The selection of instrument forms must be following the needs and characteristics of the learners. And teachers have no difficulty in making and implementing these forms of instruments when conducting evaluations either in the form of tests or nontests. If the results shown have not reached the minimum standard, it is necessary to provide follow-up in the form of remedial activities. And if it has reached the minimum standard, enrichment activities may be given.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55777,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Taallum Jurnal Pendidikan Islam\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Taallum Jurnal Pendidikan Islam\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21274/taalum.2021.9.2.272-299\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Taallum Jurnal Pendidikan Islam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21274/taalum.2021.9.2.272-299","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要:本研究采用MI Mambaul Ma'arif的案例研究方法,旨在找出MI阿拉伯语学习课程评估中使用的工具的形式。阿拉伯语科目教师的研究科目。数据收集技术,包括访谈、观察和文献研究。数据分析技术是通过归纳分析技术来实现的。结果表明,课程评价有四种类型,即形成性评价、终结性评价、投入性评价和产品性评价。使用的仪器形式有测试和非测试两种。测试仪器分为nen型和十二种非测试型。乐器形式的选择必须符合学习者的需求和特点。在以测试或非测试的形式进行评估时,教师在制作和实施这些形式的工具方面没有困难。如果所显示的结果没有达到最低标准,则有必要以补救活动的形式提供后续行动。如果已经达到最低标准,可以进行浓缩活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EVALUASI KURIKULUM PEMBELAJARAN BAHASA ARAB UNTUK PERBAIKAN MUTU AKADEMIK DI MI MAMBAUL MA’ARIF
Abstract: The research was conducted to find out the form of instruments used in the evaluation of the Arabic language learning curriculum in MI. This study uses a case study method at MI Mambaul Ma'arif. The research subject of the teacher of Arabic subjects. Data collection techniques with interviews, observations, and documentation studies. The data analysis technique is carried out by inductive analysis techniques. The results revealed that there are four types of curriculum evaluation, namely formative evaluation, summative evaluation, input evaluation, and product evaluation. The instrument forms used are test and nontest. Test instruments are classified into nen types, and twelve types of non-test types. The selection of instrument forms must be following the needs and characteristics of the learners. And teachers have no difficulty in making and implementing these forms of instruments when conducting evaluations either in the form of tests or nontests. If the results shown have not reached the minimum standard, it is necessary to provide follow-up in the form of remedial activities. And if it has reached the minimum standard, enrichment activities may be given.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
23 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信