1986-2016年大流域文化资源管理

IF 0.6 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
Hannah Russell
{"title":"1986-2016年大流域文化资源管理","authors":"Hannah Russell","doi":"10.1080/1947461x.2021.1932999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tracking cultural persistence and change before and through colonial entanglements is an important part of validating cultural authenticity amidst change. The other critical element here is the way Panich builds on the scholarship of others, including most notably that of Lightfoot (1995), to continue to show that the “prehistory” and “history” divide is an artificial one that limits study of longterm change and persistence. Panich richly uses archival and archaeological evidence to consider parallel cases of Native negotiations of colonialism, without a formulaic approach to understanding these colonial entanglements. Panich has produced a well-written and compelling case for reconsidering the historical legacies of colonialism and their impacts on Native societies today. I recommend this book for anyone researching Native California, indigenous identities, and colonialism. This study is unique for its comprehensive read of the historical and archaeological evidence, as well as its complex handling of issues of identity, agency, and cultural persistence. The insightful perspectives on divergent strategies for Native negotiation of colonialism are a powerful reminder of the enduring legacies of colonial structures and the potential for multiple, equally valid forms of indigeneity. This timely and well-researched study contributes an important voice to the fiercely contested (and often political) narrative of tribal authenticity. Anthropologists’ declarations of cultural continuity have a profound effect on federally regulated sovereignty rights and tribal self-determination, and this reframing of cultural authenticity and persistence is an important contribution to contemporary struggles for Native groups.","PeriodicalId":42699,"journal":{"name":"California Archaeology","volume":"13 1","pages":"128 - 131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cultural Resource Management in the Great Basin, 1986–2016\",\"authors\":\"Hannah Russell\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1947461x.2021.1932999\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Tracking cultural persistence and change before and through colonial entanglements is an important part of validating cultural authenticity amidst change. The other critical element here is the way Panich builds on the scholarship of others, including most notably that of Lightfoot (1995), to continue to show that the “prehistory” and “history” divide is an artificial one that limits study of longterm change and persistence. Panich richly uses archival and archaeological evidence to consider parallel cases of Native negotiations of colonialism, without a formulaic approach to understanding these colonial entanglements. Panich has produced a well-written and compelling case for reconsidering the historical legacies of colonialism and their impacts on Native societies today. I recommend this book for anyone researching Native California, indigenous identities, and colonialism. This study is unique for its comprehensive read of the historical and archaeological evidence, as well as its complex handling of issues of identity, agency, and cultural persistence. The insightful perspectives on divergent strategies for Native negotiation of colonialism are a powerful reminder of the enduring legacies of colonial structures and the potential for multiple, equally valid forms of indigeneity. This timely and well-researched study contributes an important voice to the fiercely contested (and often political) narrative of tribal authenticity. Anthropologists’ declarations of cultural continuity have a profound effect on federally regulated sovereignty rights and tribal self-determination, and this reframing of cultural authenticity and persistence is an important contribution to contemporary struggles for Native groups.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"California Archaeology\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"128 - 131\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"California Archaeology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1947461x.2021.1932999\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"California Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1947461x.2021.1932999","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在殖民纠缠之前和通过殖民纠缠来追踪文化的持久性和变化,是在变化中验证文化真实性的重要组成部分。这里的另一个关键因素是,Panich在其他人的学术基础上,包括Lightfoot(1995)的学术,继续表明“史前”和“历史”的鸿沟是人为的,限制了对长期变化和持久性的研究。Panich充分利用档案和考古证据来考虑原住民殖民主义谈判的平行案例,而没有用公式化的方法来理解这些殖民纠葛。Panich为重新思考殖民主义的历史遗产及其对当今原住民社会的影响提出了一个写得很好、很有说服力的案例。我向任何研究加州原住民、原住民身份和殖民主义的人推荐这本书。这项研究的独特之处在于它对历史和考古证据的全面解读,以及对身份、代理和文化持久性问题的复杂处理。对殖民主义本土谈判不同战略的深刻见解有力地提醒我们,殖民结构的持久遗产以及多种同样有效的本土形式的潜力。这项及时且经过充分研究的研究为部落真实性的激烈争论(通常是政治性的)叙事提供了重要的声音。人类学家对文化连续性的宣言对联邦政府监管的主权权利和部落自决产生了深远影响,这种对文化真实性和持久性的重新定义是对当代土著群体斗争的重要贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cultural Resource Management in the Great Basin, 1986–2016
Tracking cultural persistence and change before and through colonial entanglements is an important part of validating cultural authenticity amidst change. The other critical element here is the way Panich builds on the scholarship of others, including most notably that of Lightfoot (1995), to continue to show that the “prehistory” and “history” divide is an artificial one that limits study of longterm change and persistence. Panich richly uses archival and archaeological evidence to consider parallel cases of Native negotiations of colonialism, without a formulaic approach to understanding these colonial entanglements. Panich has produced a well-written and compelling case for reconsidering the historical legacies of colonialism and their impacts on Native societies today. I recommend this book for anyone researching Native California, indigenous identities, and colonialism. This study is unique for its comprehensive read of the historical and archaeological evidence, as well as its complex handling of issues of identity, agency, and cultural persistence. The insightful perspectives on divergent strategies for Native negotiation of colonialism are a powerful reminder of the enduring legacies of colonial structures and the potential for multiple, equally valid forms of indigeneity. This timely and well-researched study contributes an important voice to the fiercely contested (and often political) narrative of tribal authenticity. Anthropologists’ declarations of cultural continuity have a profound effect on federally regulated sovereignty rights and tribal self-determination, and this reframing of cultural authenticity and persistence is an important contribution to contemporary struggles for Native groups.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
California Archaeology
California Archaeology ARCHAEOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
50.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信