{"title":"体力活动对不运动成人心率变异性的影响","authors":"L. Kong, Qin Yang","doi":"10.18122/ijpah.020121.boisestate","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This meta-analysis aimed to examine the influences of physical activity (PA) interventions on heart rate variability (HRV) \n among healthy but physically inactive adults aged 18 to 65 years old. PubMed, SPORTDiscus and Web of Science online databases \n were searched in September 2021. The eligibility criteria were: (1) peer-reviewed articles in English; (2) randomized controlled \n trials; (3) healthy but physically inactive adults aged 18 to 65 years; (4) at least two-week PA intervention; (5) available \n frequency domain result. The data were extracted to a pre-designed form. The primary outcome of this study was the frequency \n domain of HRV, which included natural log-transformed total power, low frequency and high frequency (lnTP, lnLF and lnHF), normalized \n units of LF and HF (LFnu and HFnu), and LF/HF ratio. Pooled estimates of differences and 95% confidence intervals (CI) between the \n PA intervention group (IG) and control group (CG) were obtained using random-effects models. Six studies were identified in the \n meta-analysis. There was no significant difference between IG and CG in lnTP (SMD: 0.16, 95% CI: [-0.28, 0.60], p = 0.48), \n lnLF (SMD: -0.04, 95% CI: [-0.34, 0.42], p = 0.84), lnHF (SMD: 0.03, 95% CI: [-0.23, 0.29], p = 0.81) \n and LF/HF ratio(MD: -0.21, 95% CI: [-0.48, 0.07], p = 0.14). The results indicated that the LFnu in IG was \n significantly lower than that in CG (MD: -3.41, 95% CI: [-5.09, -1.73], p < 0.01) while HFnu in IG was \n significantly higher than that in CG (MD: 3.39, 95% CI: 1.72, 5.07], p < 0.01). The increased HFnu and \n decreased LFnu after PA interventions indicated a more balanced autonomic nervous system. HRV may be a mediator between PA \n intervention and other health benefits. The measurements of HRV were inconsistent and increased the variation between studies. \n The sample sizes of IG or CG in the included studies were small (range from 9 to 26), which limited the power to detect significant \n differences. This study did not analyze the influence of dose-response and different types of PA interventions due to the limited number \n of eligible studies. The current evidence suggested that PA interventions benefit HRV in healthy but physically inactive adults \n aged 18 to 65 years old. Future research with a larger sample size is needed to confirm our findings.","PeriodicalId":73469,"journal":{"name":"International journal of physical activity and health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of Physical Activity on Heart Rate Variability in Physically Inactive Adults\",\"authors\":\"L. Kong, Qin Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.18122/ijpah.020121.boisestate\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This meta-analysis aimed to examine the influences of physical activity (PA) interventions on heart rate variability (HRV) \\n among healthy but physically inactive adults aged 18 to 65 years old. PubMed, SPORTDiscus and Web of Science online databases \\n were searched in September 2021. The eligibility criteria were: (1) peer-reviewed articles in English; (2) randomized controlled \\n trials; (3) healthy but physically inactive adults aged 18 to 65 years; (4) at least two-week PA intervention; (5) available \\n frequency domain result. The data were extracted to a pre-designed form. The primary outcome of this study was the frequency \\n domain of HRV, which included natural log-transformed total power, low frequency and high frequency (lnTP, lnLF and lnHF), normalized \\n units of LF and HF (LFnu and HFnu), and LF/HF ratio. Pooled estimates of differences and 95% confidence intervals (CI) between the \\n PA intervention group (IG) and control group (CG) were obtained using random-effects models. Six studies were identified in the \\n meta-analysis. There was no significant difference between IG and CG in lnTP (SMD: 0.16, 95% CI: [-0.28, 0.60], p = 0.48), \\n lnLF (SMD: -0.04, 95% CI: [-0.34, 0.42], p = 0.84), lnHF (SMD: 0.03, 95% CI: [-0.23, 0.29], p = 0.81) \\n and LF/HF ratio(MD: -0.21, 95% CI: [-0.48, 0.07], p = 0.14). The results indicated that the LFnu in IG was \\n significantly lower than that in CG (MD: -3.41, 95% CI: [-5.09, -1.73], p < 0.01) while HFnu in IG was \\n significantly higher than that in CG (MD: 3.39, 95% CI: 1.72, 5.07], p < 0.01). The increased HFnu and \\n decreased LFnu after PA interventions indicated a more balanced autonomic nervous system. HRV may be a mediator between PA \\n intervention and other health benefits. The measurements of HRV were inconsistent and increased the variation between studies. \\n The sample sizes of IG or CG in the included studies were small (range from 9 to 26), which limited the power to detect significant \\n differences. This study did not analyze the influence of dose-response and different types of PA interventions due to the limited number \\n of eligible studies. The current evidence suggested that PA interventions benefit HRV in healthy but physically inactive adults \\n aged 18 to 65 years old. Future research with a larger sample size is needed to confirm our findings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73469,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of physical activity and health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of physical activity and health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18122/ijpah.020121.boisestate\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of physical activity and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18122/ijpah.020121.boisestate","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本荟萃分析旨在检查身体活动(PA)干预对18至65岁健康但不运动的成年人心率变异性(HRV)的影响。在2021年9月检索了PubMed、SPORTDiscus和Web of Science在线数据库。入选标准为:(1)同行评议的英文文章;(2)随机对照试验;(3) 18岁至65岁身体健康但缺乏体育活动的成年人;(4)至少两周的PA干预;(5)可用频域结果。数据被提取到预先设计的表格中。本研究的主要终点是HRV的频域,包括自然对数变换后的总功率、低频和高频(lnTP、lnLF和lnHF)、LF和HF归一化单位(LFnu和HFnu)以及LF/HF比值。采用随机效应模型对PA干预组(IG)和对照组(CG)的差异和95%置信区间(CI)进行汇总估计。在荟萃分析中确定了6项研究。IG与CG在lnTP (SMD: 0.16, 95% CI: [-0.28, 0.60], p = 0.48)、lnLF (SMD: -0.04, 95% CI: [-0.34, 0.42], p = 0.84)、lnHF (SMD: 0.03, 95% CI: [-0.23, 0.29], p = 0.81)和LF/HF比值(MD: -0.21, 95% CI: [-0.48, 0.07], p = 0.14)方面无显著差异。结果显示,IG组的LFnu显著低于CG组(MD: -3.41, 95% CI: [-5.09, -1.73], p < 0.01), IG组的HFnu显著高于CG组(MD: 3.39, 95% CI: 1.72, 5.07], p < 0.01)。PA干预后HFnu升高和LFnu降低表明自主神经系统更加平衡。HRV可能是PA干预与其他健康益处之间的中介。HRV的测量结果不一致,增加了研究之间的差异。在纳入的研究中,IG或CG的样本量很小(范围从9到26),这限制了检测显着差异的能力。由于符合条件的研究数量有限,本研究未分析剂量反应和不同类型PA干预的影响。目前的证据表明,PA干预有利于18至65岁健康但缺乏运动的成年人的HRV。未来需要更大样本量的研究来证实我们的发现。
Influence of Physical Activity on Heart Rate Variability in Physically Inactive Adults
This meta-analysis aimed to examine the influences of physical activity (PA) interventions on heart rate variability (HRV)
among healthy but physically inactive adults aged 18 to 65 years old. PubMed, SPORTDiscus and Web of Science online databases
were searched in September 2021. The eligibility criteria were: (1) peer-reviewed articles in English; (2) randomized controlled
trials; (3) healthy but physically inactive adults aged 18 to 65 years; (4) at least two-week PA intervention; (5) available
frequency domain result. The data were extracted to a pre-designed form. The primary outcome of this study was the frequency
domain of HRV, which included natural log-transformed total power, low frequency and high frequency (lnTP, lnLF and lnHF), normalized
units of LF and HF (LFnu and HFnu), and LF/HF ratio. Pooled estimates of differences and 95% confidence intervals (CI) between the
PA intervention group (IG) and control group (CG) were obtained using random-effects models. Six studies were identified in the
meta-analysis. There was no significant difference between IG and CG in lnTP (SMD: 0.16, 95% CI: [-0.28, 0.60], p = 0.48),
lnLF (SMD: -0.04, 95% CI: [-0.34, 0.42], p = 0.84), lnHF (SMD: 0.03, 95% CI: [-0.23, 0.29], p = 0.81)
and LF/HF ratio(MD: -0.21, 95% CI: [-0.48, 0.07], p = 0.14). The results indicated that the LFnu in IG was
significantly lower than that in CG (MD: -3.41, 95% CI: [-5.09, -1.73], p < 0.01) while HFnu in IG was
significantly higher than that in CG (MD: 3.39, 95% CI: 1.72, 5.07], p < 0.01). The increased HFnu and
decreased LFnu after PA interventions indicated a more balanced autonomic nervous system. HRV may be a mediator between PA
intervention and other health benefits. The measurements of HRV were inconsistent and increased the variation between studies.
The sample sizes of IG or CG in the included studies were small (range from 9 to 26), which limited the power to detect significant
differences. This study did not analyze the influence of dose-response and different types of PA interventions due to the limited number
of eligible studies. The current evidence suggested that PA interventions benefit HRV in healthy but physically inactive adults
aged 18 to 65 years old. Future research with a larger sample size is needed to confirm our findings.