1950–89年印度最高法院法官

IF 1 4区 社会学 Q2 LAW
S. Sonkar
{"title":"1950–89年印度最高法院法官","authors":"S. Sonkar","doi":"10.1080/10192557.2022.2033090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Judges play a pivotal role in the administration of justice. For this reason, they are not only expected to be impartial and independent but also to appear to be impartial and independent. Their decision-making should be guided by the parameters of the law, legal principles and the nature of the issues pertaining to the dispute before them, and their legal reasoning explained in judgments with intellectual honesty. Regardless of their personal views, they must decide, evaluate and analyse cases with the utmost objectivity. Yet, it is also often observed that, in formulating judicial decisions, judges are sometimes unable to divorce themselves completely from the values, beliefs, policy preferences, and political philosophies that they have cultivated over decades of judicial service. They may have different ideas about the law and justice. It is in this context that judicial decisions are often said to reflect the orientation of judges, ie whether they are liberal, moderate or conservative. Nonetheless, the reasons why a judge has certain attitudes, leanings, convictions, and views may not be easily decipherable.","PeriodicalId":42799,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Law Review","volume":"29 1","pages":"422 - 425"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Judges of the Supreme Court of India 1950–89\",\"authors\":\"S. Sonkar\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10192557.2022.2033090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Judges play a pivotal role in the administration of justice. For this reason, they are not only expected to be impartial and independent but also to appear to be impartial and independent. Their decision-making should be guided by the parameters of the law, legal principles and the nature of the issues pertaining to the dispute before them, and their legal reasoning explained in judgments with intellectual honesty. Regardless of their personal views, they must decide, evaluate and analyse cases with the utmost objectivity. Yet, it is also often observed that, in formulating judicial decisions, judges are sometimes unable to divorce themselves completely from the values, beliefs, policy preferences, and political philosophies that they have cultivated over decades of judicial service. They may have different ideas about the law and justice. It is in this context that judicial decisions are often said to reflect the orientation of judges, ie whether they are liberal, moderate or conservative. Nonetheless, the reasons why a judge has certain attitudes, leanings, convictions, and views may not be easily decipherable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia Pacific Law Review\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"422 - 425\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia Pacific Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10192557.2022.2033090\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10192557.2022.2033090","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

法官在司法工作中发挥着关键作用。因此,他们不仅被期望是公正和独立的,而且看起来也公正和独立。他们的决策应以法律参数、法律原则和与他们面前的争端有关的问题的性质为指导,并以理智诚实的态度在判决中解释他们的法律推理。无论他们的个人观点如何,他们都必须以最大的客观性来决定、评估和分析案件。然而,人们也经常观察到,在制定司法裁决时,法官有时无法完全脱离他们在数十年司法服务中培养的价值观、信仰、政策偏好和政治哲学。他们可能对法律和正义有不同的看法。正是在这种背景下,人们经常说司法判决反映了法官的取向,即他们是自由派、温和派还是保守派。尽管如此,法官有某些态度、倾向、信念和观点的原因可能不容易理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Judges of the Supreme Court of India 1950–89
Judges play a pivotal role in the administration of justice. For this reason, they are not only expected to be impartial and independent but also to appear to be impartial and independent. Their decision-making should be guided by the parameters of the law, legal principles and the nature of the issues pertaining to the dispute before them, and their legal reasoning explained in judgments with intellectual honesty. Regardless of their personal views, they must decide, evaluate and analyse cases with the utmost objectivity. Yet, it is also often observed that, in formulating judicial decisions, judges are sometimes unable to divorce themselves completely from the values, beliefs, policy preferences, and political philosophies that they have cultivated over decades of judicial service. They may have different ideas about the law and justice. It is in this context that judicial decisions are often said to reflect the orientation of judges, ie whether they are liberal, moderate or conservative. Nonetheless, the reasons why a judge has certain attitudes, leanings, convictions, and views may not be easily decipherable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信