{"title":"对话语料库：当“大即美”","authors":"F. Newmeyer","doi":"10.4000/COGNITEXTES.1584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The goal of this paper is to examine the relationship between corpus size and conclusions drawn from corpora regarding questions of grammatical theory. Many linguists, typically those with a ‘usage-based’ orientation, assert that introspective data, unlike corpus-derived data, is of little relevance to the construction of the correct theory of language. This paper challenges that view, arguing that introspective data and corpus-derived data do not lead to different conclusions about the nature of linguistic theory.","PeriodicalId":53774,"journal":{"name":"CogniTextes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conversational corpora : when “big is beautiful”\",\"authors\":\"F. Newmeyer\",\"doi\":\"10.4000/COGNITEXTES.1584\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The goal of this paper is to examine the relationship between corpus size and conclusions drawn from corpora regarding questions of grammatical theory. Many linguists, typically those with a ‘usage-based’ orientation, assert that introspective data, unlike corpus-derived data, is of little relevance to the construction of the correct theory of language. This paper challenges that view, arguing that introspective data and corpus-derived data do not lead to different conclusions about the nature of linguistic theory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CogniTextes\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CogniTextes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4000/COGNITEXTES.1584\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CogniTextes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/COGNITEXTES.1584","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The goal of this paper is to examine the relationship between corpus size and conclusions drawn from corpora regarding questions of grammatical theory. Many linguists, typically those with a ‘usage-based’ orientation, assert that introspective data, unlike corpus-derived data, is of little relevance to the construction of the correct theory of language. This paper challenges that view, arguing that introspective data and corpus-derived data do not lead to different conclusions about the nature of linguistic theory.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
