对Breiman的两种统计建模文化的思考

A. Gelman
{"title":"对Breiman的两种统计建模文化的思考","authors":"A. Gelman","doi":"10.1353/obs.2021.0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In his article on Two Cultures of Statistical Modeling, Leo Breiman argued for an algorithmic approach to statistics, as exemplified by his pathbreaking research on large regularized models that fit data and have good predictive properties but without attempting to capture true underlying structure. I think Breiman was right about the benefits of open-ended predictive methods for complex modern problems. I also discuss some points of disagreement, notably Breiman's dismissal of Bayesian methods, which I think reflected a misunderstanding on his part, in that he did not recognized that Bayesian inference can be viewed as regularized prediction and does not rely on an assumption that the fitted model is true. In retrospect, we can learn both from Breiman's deep foresight and from his occasional oversights.","PeriodicalId":74335,"journal":{"name":"Observational studies","volume":"7 1","pages":"95 - 98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/obs.2021.0025","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reflections on Breiman's Two Cultures of Statistical Modeling\",\"authors\":\"A. Gelman\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/obs.2021.0025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:In his article on Two Cultures of Statistical Modeling, Leo Breiman argued for an algorithmic approach to statistics, as exemplified by his pathbreaking research on large regularized models that fit data and have good predictive properties but without attempting to capture true underlying structure. I think Breiman was right about the benefits of open-ended predictive methods for complex modern problems. I also discuss some points of disagreement, notably Breiman's dismissal of Bayesian methods, which I think reflected a misunderstanding on his part, in that he did not recognized that Bayesian inference can be viewed as regularized prediction and does not rely on an assumption that the fitted model is true. In retrospect, we can learn both from Breiman's deep foresight and from his occasional oversights.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74335,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Observational studies\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"95 - 98\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/obs.2021.0025\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Observational studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/obs.2021.0025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Observational studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/obs.2021.0025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要:在《统计建模的两种文化》(Two Cultures of Statistical Modeling)一文中,Leo Breiman提出了统计学的算法方法,他对大型正则化模型进行了开创性的研究,这些模型拟合数据,具有良好的预测特性,但没有试图捕捉真正的底层结构。我认为Breiman关于开放式预测方法对复杂现代问题的好处是正确的。我还讨论了一些分歧点,特别是Breiman对贝叶斯方法的不屑一顾,我认为这反映了他的误解,因为他没有认识到贝叶斯推理可以被视为正则化预测,并且不依赖于拟合模型为真的假设。回顾过去,我们可以从布雷曼的远见卓识和偶尔的疏忽中吸取教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reflections on Breiman's Two Cultures of Statistical Modeling
Abstract:In his article on Two Cultures of Statistical Modeling, Leo Breiman argued for an algorithmic approach to statistics, as exemplified by his pathbreaking research on large regularized models that fit data and have good predictive properties but without attempting to capture true underlying structure. I think Breiman was right about the benefits of open-ended predictive methods for complex modern problems. I also discuss some points of disagreement, notably Breiman's dismissal of Bayesian methods, which I think reflected a misunderstanding on his part, in that he did not recognized that Bayesian inference can be viewed as regularized prediction and does not rely on an assumption that the fitted model is true. In retrospect, we can learn both from Breiman's deep foresight and from his occasional oversights.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信