英语情态动词在被重新分类为T之前的地位及其重新分类的触发因素

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Anglica Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.7311/0860-5734.31.2.03
C. Castillo
{"title":"英语情态动词在被重新分类为T之前的地位及其重新分类的触发因素","authors":"C. Castillo","doi":"10.7311/0860-5734.31.2.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is an account of English modals that invokes their exceptional morpho-syntactic tense properties as original preterite-present verbs in order to explain their becoming T elements. Within the framework of minimalist theory, I argue that modal verbs in OE and ME (up to approx. 1470) have an exceptional syntactic status that con- sists in that they merge directly under v, whereas strong verbs merge as a stem-by-default prior to v, and weak verbs merge as a root with a vowel-by-default also prior to v. Modals necessarily differ from both strong verbs and weak verbs in their τ–licensing, whereas they share with the latter (with both strong verbs and weak verbs) φ–licensing. A specific Probe of T is in charge of the latter for all verbs in the language. Modals pass on to merge directly under T when v ceases to be a locus of interpretable τ–features. A symptom that v loses such a capacity is the loss of the Pret.1/Pret.2 ablaut distinction.","PeriodicalId":36615,"journal":{"name":"Anglica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Status of English Modals Prior to Their Recategorization as T and the Trigger for Their Recategorization\",\"authors\":\"C. Castillo\",\"doi\":\"10.7311/0860-5734.31.2.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This is an account of English modals that invokes their exceptional morpho-syntactic tense properties as original preterite-present verbs in order to explain their becoming T elements. Within the framework of minimalist theory, I argue that modal verbs in OE and ME (up to approx. 1470) have an exceptional syntactic status that con- sists in that they merge directly under v, whereas strong verbs merge as a stem-by-default prior to v, and weak verbs merge as a root with a vowel-by-default also prior to v. Modals necessarily differ from both strong verbs and weak verbs in their τ–licensing, whereas they share with the latter (with both strong verbs and weak verbs) φ–licensing. A specific Probe of T is in charge of the latter for all verbs in the language. Modals pass on to merge directly under T when v ceases to be a locus of interpretable τ–features. A symptom that v loses such a capacity is the loss of the Pret.1/Pret.2 ablaut distinction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36615,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anglica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anglica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7311/0860-5734.31.2.03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anglica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7311/0860-5734.31.2.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这是一个关于英语情态动词的描述,它调用了它们作为原始的一般现在时动词的特殊形态句法时态属性,以解释它们成为T元素。在极简主义理论的框架内,我认为英语和英语中的情态动词(最多约为1 ~ 2)。(1470)有一种特殊的句法地位,即它们直接在v下面合并,而强动词默认在v前面合并为词干,弱动词默认在v前面合并为词根和元音。情态动词在其δ -许可上必然不同于强动词和弱动词,而后者(包括强动词和弱动词)都有φ -许可。对于语言中所有的动词,一个特定的探测T负责后者。当v不再是可解释的τ -特征的轨迹时,模态继续直接合并到T下。v丧失这种容量的一个症状是Pret.1/Pret的丧失。2关于区别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Status of English Modals Prior to Their Recategorization as T and the Trigger for Their Recategorization
This is an account of English modals that invokes their exceptional morpho-syntactic tense properties as original preterite-present verbs in order to explain their becoming T elements. Within the framework of minimalist theory, I argue that modal verbs in OE and ME (up to approx. 1470) have an exceptional syntactic status that con- sists in that they merge directly under v, whereas strong verbs merge as a stem-by-default prior to v, and weak verbs merge as a root with a vowel-by-default also prior to v. Modals necessarily differ from both strong verbs and weak verbs in their τ–licensing, whereas they share with the latter (with both strong verbs and weak verbs) φ–licensing. A specific Probe of T is in charge of the latter for all verbs in the language. Modals pass on to merge directly under T when v ceases to be a locus of interpretable τ–features. A symptom that v loses such a capacity is the loss of the Pret.1/Pret.2 ablaut distinction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anglica
Anglica Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信