胰管支架置入与胰十二指肠切除术后胰瘘

Xingyu Chen, Ye Li, Jian Zhou, Dongming Zhu, Zixiang Zhang, Dechun Li
{"title":"胰管支架置入与胰十二指肠切除术后胰瘘","authors":"Xingyu Chen, Ye Li, Jian Zhou, Dongming Zhu, Zixiang Zhang, Dechun Li","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-631X.2019.09.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo study the correlation between pancreatic duct stent placement and postoperative pancreatic fistula in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. \n \n \nMethods \nWe performed a retrospective review on 298 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy from Jan 2011 to Dec 2016. Patients were divided into none stent group, external stent group and internal stent group according to the placement and drainage of the pancreatic duct stent. \n \n \nResults \nThere were 60 cases in none stent group, 103 cases in external stent group and 135 cases in internal stent group. Altogether there were 52 cases suffering from biochemical pancreatic fistula, 52 cases of grade B fistula and 9 cases of grade C pancreatic fistula. There were three factors with statistical significance: 1, the operative method (χ2=20.947, P=0.000), 2, the diameter of main pancreatic duct (χ2=8.662, P=0.013), and 3, the intraoperative blood loss (χ2=14.03, P=0.001). There were no statistical significance difference between no stenting group and external/ internal stent group in the incidence of pancreatic fistula (P>0.05). The difference between internal stent group and external stent group was of statistical significance (χ2=9.948, P=0.019). The incidence of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula in external stent group was lower than the internal stent group (14.5% vs. 26.6%)(χ2=9.777, P=0.002). \n \n \nConclusions \nThe pancreatic duct stenting is not a risk factor for pancreatic fistula. The external drainage of pancreatic juice is associated with a lower incidence of pancreatic fistula compared to the internal drainage. \n \n \nKey words: \nPancreaticoduodenectomy; Pancreatic fistula; External drainage","PeriodicalId":66425,"journal":{"name":"中华普通外科杂志","volume":"34 1","pages":"757-761"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pancreatic duct stenting and postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy\",\"authors\":\"Xingyu Chen, Ye Li, Jian Zhou, Dongming Zhu, Zixiang Zhang, Dechun Li\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-631X.2019.09.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo study the correlation between pancreatic duct stent placement and postoperative pancreatic fistula in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nWe performed a retrospective review on 298 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy from Jan 2011 to Dec 2016. Patients were divided into none stent group, external stent group and internal stent group according to the placement and drainage of the pancreatic duct stent. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nThere were 60 cases in none stent group, 103 cases in external stent group and 135 cases in internal stent group. Altogether there were 52 cases suffering from biochemical pancreatic fistula, 52 cases of grade B fistula and 9 cases of grade C pancreatic fistula. There were three factors with statistical significance: 1, the operative method (χ2=20.947, P=0.000), 2, the diameter of main pancreatic duct (χ2=8.662, P=0.013), and 3, the intraoperative blood loss (χ2=14.03, P=0.001). There were no statistical significance difference between no stenting group and external/ internal stent group in the incidence of pancreatic fistula (P>0.05). The difference between internal stent group and external stent group was of statistical significance (χ2=9.948, P=0.019). The incidence of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula in external stent group was lower than the internal stent group (14.5% vs. 26.6%)(χ2=9.777, P=0.002). \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nThe pancreatic duct stenting is not a risk factor for pancreatic fistula. The external drainage of pancreatic juice is associated with a lower incidence of pancreatic fistula compared to the internal drainage. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nPancreaticoduodenectomy; Pancreatic fistula; External drainage\",\"PeriodicalId\":66425,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华普通外科杂志\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"757-761\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华普通外科杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-631X.2019.09.004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华普通外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-631X.2019.09.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨胰十二指肠切除术患者胰管支架置入与术后胰瘘的相关性。方法对2011年1月至2016年12月行胰十二指肠切除术的298例患者进行回顾性分析。根据胰管支架放置及引流情况将患者分为无支架组、外支架组和内支架组。结果无支架组60例,外支架组103例,内支架组135例。其中生化胰瘘52例,B级胰瘘52例,C级胰瘘9例。1、手术方式(χ2=20.947, P=0.000)、2、主胰管直径(χ2=8.662, P=0.013)、3、术中出血量(χ2=14.03, P=0.001)三个因素的差异均有统计学意义。无支架组与外/内支架组胰瘘发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。内支架组与外支架组比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=9.948, P=0.019)。外支架组临床相关胰瘘发生率低于内支架组(14.5%比26.6%)(χ2=9.777, P=0.002)。结论胰管支架置入不是胰瘘发生的危险因素。胰液外引流与内引流相比,胰瘘发生率较低。关键词:胰十二指肠切除术;胰瘘;外部排水系统
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pancreatic duct stenting and postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy
Objective To study the correlation between pancreatic duct stent placement and postoperative pancreatic fistula in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Methods We performed a retrospective review on 298 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy from Jan 2011 to Dec 2016. Patients were divided into none stent group, external stent group and internal stent group according to the placement and drainage of the pancreatic duct stent. Results There were 60 cases in none stent group, 103 cases in external stent group and 135 cases in internal stent group. Altogether there were 52 cases suffering from biochemical pancreatic fistula, 52 cases of grade B fistula and 9 cases of grade C pancreatic fistula. There were three factors with statistical significance: 1, the operative method (χ2=20.947, P=0.000), 2, the diameter of main pancreatic duct (χ2=8.662, P=0.013), and 3, the intraoperative blood loss (χ2=14.03, P=0.001). There were no statistical significance difference between no stenting group and external/ internal stent group in the incidence of pancreatic fistula (P>0.05). The difference between internal stent group and external stent group was of statistical significance (χ2=9.948, P=0.019). The incidence of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula in external stent group was lower than the internal stent group (14.5% vs. 26.6%)(χ2=9.777, P=0.002). Conclusions The pancreatic duct stenting is not a risk factor for pancreatic fistula. The external drainage of pancreatic juice is associated with a lower incidence of pancreatic fistula compared to the internal drainage. Key words: Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Pancreatic fistula; External drainage
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9825
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信