Xingyu Chen, Ye Li, Jian Zhou, Dongming Zhu, Zixiang Zhang, Dechun Li
{"title":"胰管支架置入与胰十二指肠切除术后胰瘘","authors":"Xingyu Chen, Ye Li, Jian Zhou, Dongming Zhu, Zixiang Zhang, Dechun Li","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-631X.2019.09.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo study the correlation between pancreatic duct stent placement and postoperative pancreatic fistula in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. \n \n \nMethods \nWe performed a retrospective review on 298 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy from Jan 2011 to Dec 2016. Patients were divided into none stent group, external stent group and internal stent group according to the placement and drainage of the pancreatic duct stent. \n \n \nResults \nThere were 60 cases in none stent group, 103 cases in external stent group and 135 cases in internal stent group. Altogether there were 52 cases suffering from biochemical pancreatic fistula, 52 cases of grade B fistula and 9 cases of grade C pancreatic fistula. There were three factors with statistical significance: 1, the operative method (χ2=20.947, P=0.000), 2, the diameter of main pancreatic duct (χ2=8.662, P=0.013), and 3, the intraoperative blood loss (χ2=14.03, P=0.001). There were no statistical significance difference between no stenting group and external/ internal stent group in the incidence of pancreatic fistula (P>0.05). The difference between internal stent group and external stent group was of statistical significance (χ2=9.948, P=0.019). The incidence of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula in external stent group was lower than the internal stent group (14.5% vs. 26.6%)(χ2=9.777, P=0.002). \n \n \nConclusions \nThe pancreatic duct stenting is not a risk factor for pancreatic fistula. The external drainage of pancreatic juice is associated with a lower incidence of pancreatic fistula compared to the internal drainage. \n \n \nKey words: \nPancreaticoduodenectomy; Pancreatic fistula; External drainage","PeriodicalId":66425,"journal":{"name":"中华普通外科杂志","volume":"34 1","pages":"757-761"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pancreatic duct stenting and postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy\",\"authors\":\"Xingyu Chen, Ye Li, Jian Zhou, Dongming Zhu, Zixiang Zhang, Dechun Li\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-631X.2019.09.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo study the correlation between pancreatic duct stent placement and postoperative pancreatic fistula in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nWe performed a retrospective review on 298 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy from Jan 2011 to Dec 2016. Patients were divided into none stent group, external stent group and internal stent group according to the placement and drainage of the pancreatic duct stent. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nThere were 60 cases in none stent group, 103 cases in external stent group and 135 cases in internal stent group. Altogether there were 52 cases suffering from biochemical pancreatic fistula, 52 cases of grade B fistula and 9 cases of grade C pancreatic fistula. There were three factors with statistical significance: 1, the operative method (χ2=20.947, P=0.000), 2, the diameter of main pancreatic duct (χ2=8.662, P=0.013), and 3, the intraoperative blood loss (χ2=14.03, P=0.001). There were no statistical significance difference between no stenting group and external/ internal stent group in the incidence of pancreatic fistula (P>0.05). The difference between internal stent group and external stent group was of statistical significance (χ2=9.948, P=0.019). The incidence of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula in external stent group was lower than the internal stent group (14.5% vs. 26.6%)(χ2=9.777, P=0.002). \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nThe pancreatic duct stenting is not a risk factor for pancreatic fistula. The external drainage of pancreatic juice is associated with a lower incidence of pancreatic fistula compared to the internal drainage. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nPancreaticoduodenectomy; Pancreatic fistula; External drainage\",\"PeriodicalId\":66425,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华普通外科杂志\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"757-761\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华普通外科杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-631X.2019.09.004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华普通外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-631X.2019.09.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Pancreatic duct stenting and postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy
Objective
To study the correlation between pancreatic duct stent placement and postoperative pancreatic fistula in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Methods
We performed a retrospective review on 298 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy from Jan 2011 to Dec 2016. Patients were divided into none stent group, external stent group and internal stent group according to the placement and drainage of the pancreatic duct stent.
Results
There were 60 cases in none stent group, 103 cases in external stent group and 135 cases in internal stent group. Altogether there were 52 cases suffering from biochemical pancreatic fistula, 52 cases of grade B fistula and 9 cases of grade C pancreatic fistula. There were three factors with statistical significance: 1, the operative method (χ2=20.947, P=0.000), 2, the diameter of main pancreatic duct (χ2=8.662, P=0.013), and 3, the intraoperative blood loss (χ2=14.03, P=0.001). There were no statistical significance difference between no stenting group and external/ internal stent group in the incidence of pancreatic fistula (P>0.05). The difference between internal stent group and external stent group was of statistical significance (χ2=9.948, P=0.019). The incidence of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula in external stent group was lower than the internal stent group (14.5% vs. 26.6%)(χ2=9.777, P=0.002).
Conclusions
The pancreatic duct stenting is not a risk factor for pancreatic fistula. The external drainage of pancreatic juice is associated with a lower incidence of pancreatic fistula compared to the internal drainage.
Key words:
Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Pancreatic fistula; External drainage