从建构到解构。战后现代大众住宅的遗产

Q2 Arts and Humanities
N. Belli
{"title":"从建构到解构。战后现代大众住宅的遗产","authors":"N. Belli","doi":"10.2478/aup-2020-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The aim of the study is to find out to what extent dominant ideologies of post-war decades shaped modern mass housing and to engage a discussion about potential heritage of the phenomenon. Analysis is based on the district of Lazdynai (Vilnius). The paper is committed to demonstrate that transition, considered by Tunbridge & Ashworth as a factor of dissonance in heritage, made messages and meanings embedded in mass housing obsolete, and in some cases even undesirable.","PeriodicalId":36267,"journal":{"name":"Architecture and Urban Planning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Construction to Deconstruction. The Heritage of Post-War Modern Mass Housing\",\"authors\":\"N. Belli\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/aup-2020-0014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The aim of the study is to find out to what extent dominant ideologies of post-war decades shaped modern mass housing and to engage a discussion about potential heritage of the phenomenon. Analysis is based on the district of Lazdynai (Vilnius). The paper is committed to demonstrate that transition, considered by Tunbridge & Ashworth as a factor of dissonance in heritage, made messages and meanings embedded in mass housing obsolete, and in some cases even undesirable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Architecture and Urban Planning\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Architecture and Urban Planning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/aup-2020-0014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Architecture and Urban Planning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/aup-2020-0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要本研究的目的是找出战后几十年的主导意识形态在多大程度上塑造了现代大众住房,并对这一现象的潜在遗产进行讨论。分析基于Lazdynai区(维尔纽斯)。这篇论文致力于证明,通布里奇和阿什沃斯认为这一转变是遗产不和谐的一个因素,它使嵌入大众住房中的信息和意义变得过时,在某些情况下甚至不可取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From Construction to Deconstruction. The Heritage of Post-War Modern Mass Housing
Abstract The aim of the study is to find out to what extent dominant ideologies of post-war decades shaped modern mass housing and to engage a discussion about potential heritage of the phenomenon. Analysis is based on the district of Lazdynai (Vilnius). The paper is committed to demonstrate that transition, considered by Tunbridge & Ashworth as a factor of dissonance in heritage, made messages and meanings embedded in mass housing obsolete, and in some cases even undesirable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Architecture and Urban Planning
Architecture and Urban Planning Arts and Humanities-Conservation
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信