山羊为耶和华,山羊为阿扎泽尔:赎罪日对福音书的影响,汉斯·M·莫西克(评论)

IF 0.2 3区 哲学 0 RELIGION
L. Frizzell
{"title":"山羊为耶和华,山羊为阿扎泽尔:赎罪日对福音书的影响,汉斯·M·莫西克(评论)","authors":"L. Frizzell","doi":"10.1353/cbq.2023.0061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"political economy ruled by the demands and coercion of the empire. Likewise, prior sociological research—influenced by anti-Marxist sociological models in the 1970s—presented Roman society as a coherent system in which different socioeconomic roles and occupations all fit into a cohesive whole. The reality, however, was far more governed by inequality, poverty, and the exploitation of the many by an extremely wealthy few. Building on this foundation, H.’s next chapters present the early Christ movement as an alternative to the domination and exploitation of the Roman imperial order, turning first to Acts (chap, 7) and then to economic solidarity in the letters of Paul (chap, 8). Horsley’s final section addresses contemporary implications. This section frames global capitalism as a new form of empire, the Bible as a tool of empire, and the field of biblical studies as complicit in empire (chap. 9). H. contrasts this with the biblical texts themselves. He traces the critique of empire and the call to political-economic-religious solidarity through the Hebrew Bible (chap. 10) and NT (chap. 11) and concludes in the latter half of chap. 11 with a call to create alternative communities in resistance to the empire of global capitalism. Not all will agree with the interpretive decisions that H. makes. One example is the use of Acts, where H. takes the lack of apocalyptic expectation in the apostles’ speeches as reflecting historical reality rather than indicating a late date for Acts itself. H.’s portrait of Jesus follows similar lines: Jesus eschews apocalyptic speculation and mocks the search for eternal life, preaching economic solidarity and support for families instead. Finally, H.’s sweeping critique of the field of biblical studies at times treads on shaky ground—namely, his claim that racial, ethnic, gender, and postcolonial readings of Scripture are an extension of bourgeois interests and neglect the political-economic concerns of the biblical text. What H. has truly offered here, however, is a distillation of a robust career of fifty years of scholarship, which builds on his prior works, constructs a compelling and provocative narrative of both Jesus and Paul, and calls the reader to resist the domination of global capitalism just as their early followers resisted Rome.","PeriodicalId":45718,"journal":{"name":"CATHOLIC BIBLICAL QUARTERLY","volume":"85 1","pages":"359 - 361"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Goat for Yahweh, Goat for Azazel: The Impact of Yom Kippur on the Gospels by Hans M. Moscicke (review)\",\"authors\":\"L. Frizzell\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/cbq.2023.0061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"political economy ruled by the demands and coercion of the empire. Likewise, prior sociological research—influenced by anti-Marxist sociological models in the 1970s—presented Roman society as a coherent system in which different socioeconomic roles and occupations all fit into a cohesive whole. The reality, however, was far more governed by inequality, poverty, and the exploitation of the many by an extremely wealthy few. Building on this foundation, H.’s next chapters present the early Christ movement as an alternative to the domination and exploitation of the Roman imperial order, turning first to Acts (chap, 7) and then to economic solidarity in the letters of Paul (chap, 8). Horsley’s final section addresses contemporary implications. This section frames global capitalism as a new form of empire, the Bible as a tool of empire, and the field of biblical studies as complicit in empire (chap. 9). H. contrasts this with the biblical texts themselves. He traces the critique of empire and the call to political-economic-religious solidarity through the Hebrew Bible (chap. 10) and NT (chap. 11) and concludes in the latter half of chap. 11 with a call to create alternative communities in resistance to the empire of global capitalism. Not all will agree with the interpretive decisions that H. makes. One example is the use of Acts, where H. takes the lack of apocalyptic expectation in the apostles’ speeches as reflecting historical reality rather than indicating a late date for Acts itself. H.’s portrait of Jesus follows similar lines: Jesus eschews apocalyptic speculation and mocks the search for eternal life, preaching economic solidarity and support for families instead. Finally, H.’s sweeping critique of the field of biblical studies at times treads on shaky ground—namely, his claim that racial, ethnic, gender, and postcolonial readings of Scripture are an extension of bourgeois interests and neglect the political-economic concerns of the biblical text. What H. has truly offered here, however, is a distillation of a robust career of fifty years of scholarship, which builds on his prior works, constructs a compelling and provocative narrative of both Jesus and Paul, and calls the reader to resist the domination of global capitalism just as their early followers resisted Rome.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45718,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CATHOLIC BIBLICAL QUARTERLY\",\"volume\":\"85 1\",\"pages\":\"359 - 361\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CATHOLIC BIBLICAL QUARTERLY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/cbq.2023.0061\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CATHOLIC BIBLICAL QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cbq.2023.0061","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由帝国的要求和强制统治的政治经济。同样,先前的社会学研究——受到20世纪70年代反马克思主义社会学模型的影响——将罗马社会呈现为一个连贯的系统,在这个系统中,不同的社会经济角色和职业都适合于一个有凝聚力的整体。然而,现实情况是,不平等、贫困和极少数富人对多数人的剥削更为严重。在此基础上,H.的下一章将早期基督运动作为罗马帝国统治和剥削的另一种选择,首先转向使徒行传(第7章),然后转向保罗书信中的经济团结(第8章)。霍斯利的最后一章阐述了当代的影响。本节将全球资本主义框架为一种新的帝国形式,圣经是帝国的工具,圣经研究领域是帝国的同谋(第9章)。H.将其与圣经文本本身进行对比。他通过希伯来圣经(第10章)和新约(第11章)追溯了对帝国的批判和对政治-经济-宗教团结的呼吁,并在第11章的后半部分结束,呼吁建立另一种社区,以抵抗全球资本主义帝国。并不是所有人都会同意H.做出的解释性决定。一个例子是使徒行传的使用,H.认为使徒们的演讲中缺乏对世界末日的期待,这反映了历史现实,而不是表明使徒行传本身的日期晚了。H.对耶稣的描绘也遵循了类似的路线:耶稣避免了对世界末日的猜测,嘲笑了对永生的追求,而是宣扬经济上的团结和对家庭的支持。最后,H对圣经研究领域的全面批判有时是站不住脚的,即他声称种族、民族、性别和后殖民时代对圣经的解读是资产阶级利益的延伸,忽视了圣经文本的政治经济问题。然而,H.在这里真正提供的是他50年的学术生涯的精华,它建立在他之前的作品的基础上,构建了一个引人注目和引人入胜的关于耶稣和保罗的叙述,并呼吁读者抵制全球资本主义的统治,就像他们早期的追随者抵制罗马一样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Goat for Yahweh, Goat for Azazel: The Impact of Yom Kippur on the Gospels by Hans M. Moscicke (review)
political economy ruled by the demands and coercion of the empire. Likewise, prior sociological research—influenced by anti-Marxist sociological models in the 1970s—presented Roman society as a coherent system in which different socioeconomic roles and occupations all fit into a cohesive whole. The reality, however, was far more governed by inequality, poverty, and the exploitation of the many by an extremely wealthy few. Building on this foundation, H.’s next chapters present the early Christ movement as an alternative to the domination and exploitation of the Roman imperial order, turning first to Acts (chap, 7) and then to economic solidarity in the letters of Paul (chap, 8). Horsley’s final section addresses contemporary implications. This section frames global capitalism as a new form of empire, the Bible as a tool of empire, and the field of biblical studies as complicit in empire (chap. 9). H. contrasts this with the biblical texts themselves. He traces the critique of empire and the call to political-economic-religious solidarity through the Hebrew Bible (chap. 10) and NT (chap. 11) and concludes in the latter half of chap. 11 with a call to create alternative communities in resistance to the empire of global capitalism. Not all will agree with the interpretive decisions that H. makes. One example is the use of Acts, where H. takes the lack of apocalyptic expectation in the apostles’ speeches as reflecting historical reality rather than indicating a late date for Acts itself. H.’s portrait of Jesus follows similar lines: Jesus eschews apocalyptic speculation and mocks the search for eternal life, preaching economic solidarity and support for families instead. Finally, H.’s sweeping critique of the field of biblical studies at times treads on shaky ground—namely, his claim that racial, ethnic, gender, and postcolonial readings of Scripture are an extension of bourgeois interests and neglect the political-economic concerns of the biblical text. What H. has truly offered here, however, is a distillation of a robust career of fifty years of scholarship, which builds on his prior works, constructs a compelling and provocative narrative of both Jesus and Paul, and calls the reader to resist the domination of global capitalism just as their early followers resisted Rome.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
129
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信