基于对数模糊偏好规划和最小二乘支持向量机的软件工作量估算

Adnan Purwanto, L. Manik
{"title":"基于对数模糊偏好规划和最小二乘支持向量机的软件工作量估算","authors":"Adnan Purwanto, L. Manik","doi":"10.15294/sji.v10i1.39865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Effort Estimation is a process by which one can predict the development time and cost to develop a software process or product. Many approaches have been tried to predict this probabilistic process accurately, but no single technique has been consistently successful. There have been many studies on software effort estimation using Fuzzy or Machine Learning. For this reason, this study aims to combine Fuzzy and Machine Learning and get better results.Methods: Various methods and combinations have been carried out in previous research, this research tries to combine Fuzzy and Machine Learning methods, namely Logarithmic Fuzzy Preference Programming (LFPP) and Least Squares Support Vector Machines Machine (LSSVM). LFPP is used to recalculate the cost driver weights and generate Effort Adjustment Point (EAP). The EAP and Lines of Code values are then entered as input for LSSVM. The output results are then measured using the Mean Magnitude of Relative Error (MMRE) and Root-Mean-Square Error (RMSE). In this study, COCOMO and NASA datasets were used.Result: The results obtained are MMRE of 0.015019 and RMSE of 1.703092 on the COCOMO dataset, while on the NASA dataset the results of MMRE are 0.007324 and RMSE are 6.037986. Then 100% of the prediction results meet the 1% range of actual effort on the COCOMO dataset, while on the NASA dataset, the results show that 89,475 meet the 1% range of actual effort and 100% meet the 5% range of actual effort. The results of this study also show a better level of accuracy than using the COCOMO Intermediate method.Novelty: This study uses a combination of LFPP and LSSVM, which is an improvement from previous studies that used a combination of FAHP and LSSVM. The method used is also different where LFPP produces better output than FAHP and all data in the dataset is used for training and testing, whereas in previous research it only used a small part of the data.","PeriodicalId":30781,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Journal of Informatics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Software Effort Estimation Using Logarithmic Fuzzy Preference Programming and Least Squares Support Vector Machines\",\"authors\":\"Adnan Purwanto, L. Manik\",\"doi\":\"10.15294/sji.v10i1.39865\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: Effort Estimation is a process by which one can predict the development time and cost to develop a software process or product. Many approaches have been tried to predict this probabilistic process accurately, but no single technique has been consistently successful. There have been many studies on software effort estimation using Fuzzy or Machine Learning. For this reason, this study aims to combine Fuzzy and Machine Learning and get better results.Methods: Various methods and combinations have been carried out in previous research, this research tries to combine Fuzzy and Machine Learning methods, namely Logarithmic Fuzzy Preference Programming (LFPP) and Least Squares Support Vector Machines Machine (LSSVM). LFPP is used to recalculate the cost driver weights and generate Effort Adjustment Point (EAP). The EAP and Lines of Code values are then entered as input for LSSVM. The output results are then measured using the Mean Magnitude of Relative Error (MMRE) and Root-Mean-Square Error (RMSE). In this study, COCOMO and NASA datasets were used.Result: The results obtained are MMRE of 0.015019 and RMSE of 1.703092 on the COCOMO dataset, while on the NASA dataset the results of MMRE are 0.007324 and RMSE are 6.037986. Then 100% of the prediction results meet the 1% range of actual effort on the COCOMO dataset, while on the NASA dataset, the results show that 89,475 meet the 1% range of actual effort and 100% meet the 5% range of actual effort. The results of this study also show a better level of accuracy than using the COCOMO Intermediate method.Novelty: This study uses a combination of LFPP and LSSVM, which is an improvement from previous studies that used a combination of FAHP and LSSVM. The method used is also different where LFPP produces better output than FAHP and all data in the dataset is used for training and testing, whereas in previous research it only used a small part of the data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30781,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Journal of Informatics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Journal of Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15294/sji.v10i1.39865\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Journal of Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/sji.v10i1.39865","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:工作量估算是一个过程,通过它可以预测开发软件过程或产品的开发时间和成本。人们尝试了许多方法来准确地预测这一概率过程,但没有一种技术一直取得成功。利用模糊或机器学习对软件工作量进行估算已经有了很多研究。因此,本研究旨在将模糊和机器学习相结合,以获得更好的结果。方法:在以往的研究中已经进行了各种方法和组合,本研究尝试将模糊和机器学习方法结合起来,即对数模糊偏好规划(LFPP)和最小二乘支持向量机(LSSVM)。利用LFPP重新计算成本动因权重,生成努力调整点(EAP)。然后将EAP和代码行值作为LSSVM的输入输入。然后使用相对误差的平均幅度(MMRE)和均方根误差(RMSE)测量输出结果。本研究使用了COCOMO和NASA数据集。结果:COCOMO数据集的MMRE为0.015019,RMSE为1.703092,NASA数据集的MMRE为0.007324,RMSE为6.037986。在COCOMO数据集上,100%的预测结果满足1%的实际努力范围,而在NASA数据集上,89,475个预测结果满足1%的实际努力范围,100%满足5%的实际努力范围。本研究的结果也显示出比使用COCOMO中间方法更好的精度水平。新颖性:本研究使用了LFPP和LSSVM的组合,这是对先前使用FAHP和LSSVM组合的研究的改进。使用的方法也不同,LFPP比FAHP产生更好的输出,数据集中的所有数据都用于训练和测试,而在以前的研究中,它只使用了一小部分数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Software Effort Estimation Using Logarithmic Fuzzy Preference Programming and Least Squares Support Vector Machines
Purpose: Effort Estimation is a process by which one can predict the development time and cost to develop a software process or product. Many approaches have been tried to predict this probabilistic process accurately, but no single technique has been consistently successful. There have been many studies on software effort estimation using Fuzzy or Machine Learning. For this reason, this study aims to combine Fuzzy and Machine Learning and get better results.Methods: Various methods and combinations have been carried out in previous research, this research tries to combine Fuzzy and Machine Learning methods, namely Logarithmic Fuzzy Preference Programming (LFPP) and Least Squares Support Vector Machines Machine (LSSVM). LFPP is used to recalculate the cost driver weights and generate Effort Adjustment Point (EAP). The EAP and Lines of Code values are then entered as input for LSSVM. The output results are then measured using the Mean Magnitude of Relative Error (MMRE) and Root-Mean-Square Error (RMSE). In this study, COCOMO and NASA datasets were used.Result: The results obtained are MMRE of 0.015019 and RMSE of 1.703092 on the COCOMO dataset, while on the NASA dataset the results of MMRE are 0.007324 and RMSE are 6.037986. Then 100% of the prediction results meet the 1% range of actual effort on the COCOMO dataset, while on the NASA dataset, the results show that 89,475 meet the 1% range of actual effort and 100% meet the 5% range of actual effort. The results of this study also show a better level of accuracy than using the COCOMO Intermediate method.Novelty: This study uses a combination of LFPP and LSSVM, which is an improvement from previous studies that used a combination of FAHP and LSSVM. The method used is also different where LFPP produces better output than FAHP and all data in the dataset is used for training and testing, whereas in previous research it only used a small part of the data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信