意义的伦理维度

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Juan Carlos Aguirre García
{"title":"意义的伦理维度","authors":"Juan Carlos Aguirre García","doi":"10.4067/s0718-92732021000300009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to identify the basic aspects of Emmanuel Levinas’ thesis on the ethical dimension of significance. At fi rst, the author’s criticisms of two approaches to signification, called in this work: the sphere of signs (section 1) and the sphere of expression (section 2), are reconstructed. In the second moment, Levinas' thesis is stated, according to which, it is in the ethical field where the meaning finds its original meaning (section 3). Finally, some possibili-ties are identified that this Levinasian consideration of meaning opens up for discussions on perception, the contemporary crisis of meaning, and epistemology (section 4). Rather than a detailed exposition of the Levinasian theory of signification, we will point out other channels of reflection based on its ethics as a first philosophy, without getting bogged down in it.","PeriodicalId":37834,"journal":{"name":"Veritas","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La dimensión ética de la significación\",\"authors\":\"Juan Carlos Aguirre García\",\"doi\":\"10.4067/s0718-92732021000300009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article aims to identify the basic aspects of Emmanuel Levinas’ thesis on the ethical dimension of significance. At fi rst, the author’s criticisms of two approaches to signification, called in this work: the sphere of signs (section 1) and the sphere of expression (section 2), are reconstructed. In the second moment, Levinas' thesis is stated, according to which, it is in the ethical field where the meaning finds its original meaning (section 3). Finally, some possibili-ties are identified that this Levinasian consideration of meaning opens up for discussions on perception, the contemporary crisis of meaning, and epistemology (section 4). Rather than a detailed exposition of the Levinasian theory of signification, we will point out other channels of reflection based on its ethics as a first philosophy, without getting bogged down in it.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veritas\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veritas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-92732021000300009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veritas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-92732021000300009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在探讨列维纳斯关于意义的伦理维度的基本观点。首先,作者对两种意义研究方法的批评进行了重构,这两种方法在本书中被称为:符号领域(第1节)和表达领域(第2节)。在第二部分,列文那斯的论点被陈述,根据这个论点,它是在伦理领域中,意义找到了它的原始意义(第3节)。最后,一些可能性被确定,列文那斯对意义的考虑开启了对知觉、当代意义危机和认识论的讨论(第4节)。我们将指出基于其作为第一哲学的伦理的其他反思途径,而不陷入其中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
La dimensión ética de la significación
This article aims to identify the basic aspects of Emmanuel Levinas’ thesis on the ethical dimension of significance. At fi rst, the author’s criticisms of two approaches to signification, called in this work: the sphere of signs (section 1) and the sphere of expression (section 2), are reconstructed. In the second moment, Levinas' thesis is stated, according to which, it is in the ethical field where the meaning finds its original meaning (section 3). Finally, some possibili-ties are identified that this Levinasian consideration of meaning opens up for discussions on perception, the contemporary crisis of meaning, and epistemology (section 4). Rather than a detailed exposition of the Levinasian theory of signification, we will point out other channels of reflection based on its ethics as a first philosophy, without getting bogged down in it.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Veritas
Veritas Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: VERITAS, Revista de Filosofía y Teología fue fundada en 1994 por el Pontificio Seminario Mayor San Rafael de Valparaíso (Chile). A partir del año 2017 es una publicación cuatrimestral (Abril, Agosto y Diciembre). El idioma habitual de la revista es el español, aunque queda abierta la posibilidad para publicar artículos en otros idiomas, tales como inglés, francés, italiano o portugués. VERITAS tiene como objetivo difundir entre los académicos y estudiantes del seminario, así como también de otras instituciones eclesiásticas y universitarias, nacionales y extranjeras, el resultado de la investigación en las áreas de la Filosofía y la Teología. Así, y desde su talante católico, pretende llevar a cabo una contribución de actualidad y rigor científico que promueva la reflexión y el debate abierto en la vida académica.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信