{"title":"复杂股腘动脉粥样硬化病变的治疗——来自未选择患者队列的结论。","authors":"Aleksander Łukasiewicz","doi":"10.5603/aa.2021.0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Endovascular techniques have revolutionized the treatment of lower extremity artery disease (LEAD). Despite this, the treatment of complex femoropopliteal lesions is a field of debate. This report sum marizes the current experience in the treatment of complex femoropopliteal lesions in the author’s center. Material and methods: This is a retrospective, observational cohort study of patients with complex (TASC C and D) femoropopliteal lesions. The patients were treated using either endovascular procedure or surgical bypass. Details of the procedure, complications, mortality and amputation rate, primary and secondary patency rates, and reinterventions were analyzed. Results: The study included 201 patients. One hundred thirty patients received endovascular treatment (ET), whereas in 67 a femoropopliteal bypass (FB) was implanted. The hybrid approach was utilized in 4 patients. ET was preferred in primary (88.5% vs. 47.8%, p < 0.001), shorter (25 vs. 30 cm, p < 0.02), TASC C lesions (63.1% vs. 40.3%, p < 0.003). Complications were more common in FB group (26.9% vs. 13.8%, p < 0.03). Reinterventions were similar. The postoperative stay was shorter in the ET group (1 vs. 6 days, p < 0.001). Primary and secondary patency rates for autologous vein reconstruction were insignificantly higher than for ET. Primary and secondary patency in patients with synthetic bypass was significantly inferior to autologous vein conduit (AVC) and endovascular procedure. The limb salvage at 3 years was highest in the ET group (94.1%) and the difference was significant (p < 0.04, and p < 0.001 for AVC and synthetic bypass, respectively). Conclusions: ET is preferred in primary and shorter lesions and is related to the shorter postoperative stay. It carries a lower risk of major amputation than surgery. Autologous vein conduit provides highest primary and secondary patency rates. Both treatment options (surgery and endovascular) should be considered in patients with long femoropopliteal lesions to assure the optimal outcome.","PeriodicalId":41754,"journal":{"name":"Acta Angiologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The treatment of complex femoropopliteal atherosclerotic lesions- conclusions from the unselected patients cohort.\",\"authors\":\"Aleksander Łukasiewicz\",\"doi\":\"10.5603/aa.2021.0011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Endovascular techniques have revolutionized the treatment of lower extremity artery disease (LEAD). Despite this, the treatment of complex femoropopliteal lesions is a field of debate. This report sum marizes the current experience in the treatment of complex femoropopliteal lesions in the author’s center. Material and methods: This is a retrospective, observational cohort study of patients with complex (TASC C and D) femoropopliteal lesions. The patients were treated using either endovascular procedure or surgical bypass. Details of the procedure, complications, mortality and amputation rate, primary and secondary patency rates, and reinterventions were analyzed. Results: The study included 201 patients. One hundred thirty patients received endovascular treatment (ET), whereas in 67 a femoropopliteal bypass (FB) was implanted. The hybrid approach was utilized in 4 patients. ET was preferred in primary (88.5% vs. 47.8%, p < 0.001), shorter (25 vs. 30 cm, p < 0.02), TASC C lesions (63.1% vs. 40.3%, p < 0.003). Complications were more common in FB group (26.9% vs. 13.8%, p < 0.03). Reinterventions were similar. The postoperative stay was shorter in the ET group (1 vs. 6 days, p < 0.001). Primary and secondary patency rates for autologous vein reconstruction were insignificantly higher than for ET. Primary and secondary patency in patients with synthetic bypass was significantly inferior to autologous vein conduit (AVC) and endovascular procedure. The limb salvage at 3 years was highest in the ET group (94.1%) and the difference was significant (p < 0.04, and p < 0.001 for AVC and synthetic bypass, respectively). Conclusions: ET is preferred in primary and shorter lesions and is related to the shorter postoperative stay. It carries a lower risk of major amputation than surgery. Autologous vein conduit provides highest primary and secondary patency rates. Both treatment options (surgery and endovascular) should be considered in patients with long femoropopliteal lesions to assure the optimal outcome.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41754,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Angiologica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Angiologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5603/aa.2021.0011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Angiologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/aa.2021.0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
血管内技术已经彻底改变了下肢动脉疾病(LEAD)的治疗。尽管如此,复杂股腘病变的治疗仍是一个有争议的领域。本报告总结了目前在作者中心治疗复杂股腘病变的经验。材料和方法:这是一项针对复杂(TASC C和D)股腘动脉病变患者的回顾性观察队列研究。患者采用血管内手术或旁路手术治疗。分析手术细节、并发症、死亡率和截肢率、原发性和继发性通畅率以及再干预。结果:纳入201例患者。130例患者接受了血管内治疗(ET), 67例患者接受了股腘动脉搭桥(FB)。4例患者采用混合入路。ET优先用于原发性(88.5%对47.8%,p < 0.001)、较短(25对30 cm, p < 0.02)、TASC C病变(63.1%对40.3%,p < 0.003)。FB组并发症发生率较高(26.9% vs 13.8%, p < 0.03)。再干预情况相似。ET组术后住院时间较短(1天vs. 6天,p < 0.001)。自体静脉重建的原发性和继发性通畅率不显著高于ET。人工搭桥患者的原发性和继发性通畅率明显低于自体静脉导管(AVC)和血管内手术。ET组3年肢体保留率最高(94.1%),AVC组和人工旁路组差异有统计学意义(p < 0.04, p < 0.001)。结论:ET优先用于原发性和较短的病变,并与较短的术后住院时间有关。它比手术有更低的截肢风险。自体静脉导管提供最高的原发性和继发性通畅率。长股腘病变患者应考虑两种治疗方案(手术和血管内),以确保最佳结果。
The treatment of complex femoropopliteal atherosclerotic lesions- conclusions from the unselected patients cohort.
Introduction: Endovascular techniques have revolutionized the treatment of lower extremity artery disease (LEAD). Despite this, the treatment of complex femoropopliteal lesions is a field of debate. This report sum marizes the current experience in the treatment of complex femoropopliteal lesions in the author’s center. Material and methods: This is a retrospective, observational cohort study of patients with complex (TASC C and D) femoropopliteal lesions. The patients were treated using either endovascular procedure or surgical bypass. Details of the procedure, complications, mortality and amputation rate, primary and secondary patency rates, and reinterventions were analyzed. Results: The study included 201 patients. One hundred thirty patients received endovascular treatment (ET), whereas in 67 a femoropopliteal bypass (FB) was implanted. The hybrid approach was utilized in 4 patients. ET was preferred in primary (88.5% vs. 47.8%, p < 0.001), shorter (25 vs. 30 cm, p < 0.02), TASC C lesions (63.1% vs. 40.3%, p < 0.003). Complications were more common in FB group (26.9% vs. 13.8%, p < 0.03). Reinterventions were similar. The postoperative stay was shorter in the ET group (1 vs. 6 days, p < 0.001). Primary and secondary patency rates for autologous vein reconstruction were insignificantly higher than for ET. Primary and secondary patency in patients with synthetic bypass was significantly inferior to autologous vein conduit (AVC) and endovascular procedure. The limb salvage at 3 years was highest in the ET group (94.1%) and the difference was significant (p < 0.04, and p < 0.001 for AVC and synthetic bypass, respectively). Conclusions: ET is preferred in primary and shorter lesions and is related to the shorter postoperative stay. It carries a lower risk of major amputation than surgery. Autologous vein conduit provides highest primary and secondary patency rates. Both treatment options (surgery and endovascular) should be considered in patients with long femoropopliteal lesions to assure the optimal outcome.
期刊介绍:
Acta Angiologica is a bilingual (Polish/English) quarterly for angiologists and vascular surgeons as well as for other doctors interested in vascular disorders. Original papers, reviews, case reports and letters submitted by authors from different countries, concerning physiology, pathology, presentation, diagnostics and treatment of vascular system, are published. Thorough contents of Acta Angiologica provide valuable information about modern diagnostic and therapeutic issues as well as advances in basic sciences and pharmacology.