反对堕胎的原始攻势及其影响。特朗普之后的美国最高法院

Q3 Arts and Humanities
S. Luconi
{"title":"反对堕胎的原始攻势及其影响。特朗普之后的美国最高法院","authors":"S. Luconi","doi":"10.3280/pass2023-118001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"President Donald Trump's most significant legacy has probably been his contribution to the establishment of an originalist, rather than conservative, majority on the Supreme Court. By overturning Roe v. Wade in 2022 on the grounds that the Constitution does not confer a right to abortion in the framework of privacy protection, the originalism-oriented justices not only infringed women's reproductive rights but also paved the way for the denyial other prerogatives.","PeriodicalId":38565,"journal":{"name":"Passato e Presente","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"L'offensiva originalista contro l'aborto e le sue implicazioni. La Corte Suprema degli Stati Uniti dopo Trump\",\"authors\":\"S. Luconi\",\"doi\":\"10.3280/pass2023-118001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"President Donald Trump's most significant legacy has probably been his contribution to the establishment of an originalist, rather than conservative, majority on the Supreme Court. By overturning Roe v. Wade in 2022 on the grounds that the Constitution does not confer a right to abortion in the framework of privacy protection, the originalism-oriented justices not only infringed women's reproductive rights but also paved the way for the denyial other prerogatives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38565,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Passato e Presente\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Passato e Presente\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3280/pass2023-118001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Passato e Presente","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3280/pass2023-118001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

唐纳德·特朗普(Donald Trump)总统最重要的遗产可能是他为在最高法院建立原旨主义者(而非保守派)多数做出的贡献。在2022年推翻罗伊诉韦德案(Roe v. Wade),理由是宪法没有在隐私保护的框架内赋予堕胎权,这不仅侵犯了妇女的生育权,而且为剥夺其他特权铺平了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
L'offensiva originalista contro l'aborto e le sue implicazioni. La Corte Suprema degli Stati Uniti dopo Trump
President Donald Trump's most significant legacy has probably been his contribution to the establishment of an originalist, rather than conservative, majority on the Supreme Court. By overturning Roe v. Wade in 2022 on the grounds that the Constitution does not confer a right to abortion in the framework of privacy protection, the originalism-oriented justices not only infringed women's reproductive rights but also paved the way for the denyial other prerogatives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Passato e Presente
Passato e Presente Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信