从硬结碳酸盐中释放微化石:三种分解方法的比较

IF 4.1 3区 地球科学 Q1 PALEONTOLOGY
C. Beasley, Daniel B. Parvaz, L. Cotton, K. Littler
{"title":"从硬结碳酸盐中释放微化石:三种分解方法的比较","authors":"C. Beasley, Daniel B. Parvaz, L. Cotton, K. Littler","doi":"10.5194/jm-39-169-2020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Three disaggregation methods, i.e. Calgon, acetic acid and electric\npulse fragmentation (EPF), have been applied to a range of heavily\nlithified, carbonate-rich sedimentary rock samples of Paleogene age. Samples\nare predominantly from the carbonate-rich, shallow water domain (  m palaeo-water depth) of Tanzania, Malta and the United Arab Emirates\n(Paleogene Tethys Ocean). The effectiveness and efficiency of each method\nhas been compared, in addition to the preservation of the resultant liberated\nmicrofossil material (primarily larger foraminifera; LF). Of the three\nmethods, the most efficient and effective was EPF, which liberated the\nlargest number of LF in a very short processing time and resulted in the\nbest preservation. Samples with calcitic, silicic, and clay matrices and\ncements were successfully disaggregated using EPF. In this study, recovered\nmicrofossils were largely >500 µ m, suggesting this\ntechnique may be more appropriate for liberating larger microfossils (e.g.\nLFs); however, we discuss nuances to the method that would allow for more\neffective recovery of smaller microfossil specimens. The more traditional\nacetic acid method was also able to disaggregate a number of the samples;\nhowever, preservation of the LF was compromised. We suggest a best-practice\nmethodology for implementing EPF in micropalaeontological studies.","PeriodicalId":54786,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Micropalaeontology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Liberating microfossils from indurated carbonates: comparison of three disaggregation methods\",\"authors\":\"C. Beasley, Daniel B. Parvaz, L. Cotton, K. Littler\",\"doi\":\"10.5194/jm-39-169-2020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. Three disaggregation methods, i.e. Calgon, acetic acid and electric\\npulse fragmentation (EPF), have been applied to a range of heavily\\nlithified, carbonate-rich sedimentary rock samples of Paleogene age. Samples\\nare predominantly from the carbonate-rich, shallow water domain (  m palaeo-water depth) of Tanzania, Malta and the United Arab Emirates\\n(Paleogene Tethys Ocean). The effectiveness and efficiency of each method\\nhas been compared, in addition to the preservation of the resultant liberated\\nmicrofossil material (primarily larger foraminifera; LF). Of the three\\nmethods, the most efficient and effective was EPF, which liberated the\\nlargest number of LF in a very short processing time and resulted in the\\nbest preservation. Samples with calcitic, silicic, and clay matrices and\\ncements were successfully disaggregated using EPF. In this study, recovered\\nmicrofossils were largely >500 µ m, suggesting this\\ntechnique may be more appropriate for liberating larger microfossils (e.g.\\nLFs); however, we discuss nuances to the method that would allow for more\\neffective recovery of smaller microfossil specimens. The more traditional\\nacetic acid method was also able to disaggregate a number of the samples;\\nhowever, preservation of the LF was compromised. We suggest a best-practice\\nmethodology for implementing EPF in micropalaeontological studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54786,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Micropalaeontology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Micropalaeontology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5194/jm-39-169-2020\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PALEONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Micropalaeontology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/jm-39-169-2020","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PALEONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要应用Calgon、乙酸和电脉冲破碎(EPF)三种崩解方法对一系列古近系重岩化、富碳酸盐的沉积岩样品进行了研究。样品主要来自坦桑尼亚、马耳他和阿拉伯联合酋长国(古近系特提斯洋)的富碳酸盐浅水区(m古水深)。每种方法的有效性和效率都进行了比较,并保存了最终释放的微化石材料(主要是较大的有孔虫;低频)。在这三种方法中,最有效的是EPF,它在很短的处理时间内释放了最多的LF,并获得了最好的保存效果。用EPF成功地分解了含有钙、硅和粘土基质和胶结物的样品。在本研究中,回收的微化石大多在0 ~ 500µm,表明该技术可能更适合于释放较大的微化石(如lfs);然而,我们讨论的方法的细微差别,将允许更有效地恢复较小的微化石标本。更传统的醋酸法也能够分解一些样品,然而,LF的保存受到损害。我们提出了在微体古生物学研究中实施EPF的最佳实践方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Liberating microfossils from indurated carbonates: comparison of three disaggregation methods
Abstract. Three disaggregation methods, i.e. Calgon, acetic acid and electric pulse fragmentation (EPF), have been applied to a range of heavily lithified, carbonate-rich sedimentary rock samples of Paleogene age. Samples are predominantly from the carbonate-rich, shallow water domain (  m palaeo-water depth) of Tanzania, Malta and the United Arab Emirates (Paleogene Tethys Ocean). The effectiveness and efficiency of each method has been compared, in addition to the preservation of the resultant liberated microfossil material (primarily larger foraminifera; LF). Of the three methods, the most efficient and effective was EPF, which liberated the largest number of LF in a very short processing time and resulted in the best preservation. Samples with calcitic, silicic, and clay matrices and cements were successfully disaggregated using EPF. In this study, recovered microfossils were largely >500 µ m, suggesting this technique may be more appropriate for liberating larger microfossils (e.g. LFs); however, we discuss nuances to the method that would allow for more effective recovery of smaller microfossil specimens. The more traditional acetic acid method was also able to disaggregate a number of the samples; however, preservation of the LF was compromised. We suggest a best-practice methodology for implementing EPF in micropalaeontological studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Micropalaeontology
Journal of Micropalaeontology 生物-古生物学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Micropalaeontology (JM) is an established international journal covering all aspects of microfossils and their application to both applied studies and basic research. In particular we welcome submissions relating to microfossils and their application to palaeoceanography, palaeoclimatology, palaeobiology, evolution, taxonomy, environmental change and molecular phylogeny.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信