学术研究者对激励认知的探索性分析:来自西班牙一所公立大学的证据

IF 2.7 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Félix Guerrero-Alba, Fernando Martín‐Alcázar, Gonzalo Sánchez-Gardey
{"title":"学术研究者对激励认知的探索性分析:来自西班牙一所公立大学的证据","authors":"Félix Guerrero-Alba, Fernando Martín‐Alcázar, Gonzalo Sánchez-Gardey","doi":"10.1080/1360080X.2022.2136380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The perception of academic researchers on management instruments has generated significant controversy in the literature. Studies have highlighted that these perceptions affect research performance more than management itself. This work addresses this issue by proposing a subjective measurement that explains research incentives in a public university. The study was conducted using a mixed-methodology approach. To initially identify the research incentives, a Delphi study was developed through the inclusion of 62 experts. Based on the Delphi results, to contrast the internal composition of the research incentive system, 259 academic researchers from a Spanish university were subjected to an exploratory factor analysis. The results revealed four potential incentives that were perceived by the researchers. The analysis of these factors contributes to the debate about the way in which academic managers can promote the design of effective incentives that could be assumed and accepted by researchers.","PeriodicalId":51489,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management","volume":"44 1","pages":"613 - 629"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploratory analysis of the perception of academic researchers about incentives: evidence from a Spanish public university\",\"authors\":\"Félix Guerrero-Alba, Fernando Martín‐Alcázar, Gonzalo Sánchez-Gardey\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1360080X.2022.2136380\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The perception of academic researchers on management instruments has generated significant controversy in the literature. Studies have highlighted that these perceptions affect research performance more than management itself. This work addresses this issue by proposing a subjective measurement that explains research incentives in a public university. The study was conducted using a mixed-methodology approach. To initially identify the research incentives, a Delphi study was developed through the inclusion of 62 experts. Based on the Delphi results, to contrast the internal composition of the research incentive system, 259 academic researchers from a Spanish university were subjected to an exploratory factor analysis. The results revealed four potential incentives that were perceived by the researchers. The analysis of these factors contributes to the debate about the way in which academic managers can promote the design of effective incentives that could be assumed and accepted by researchers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51489,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"613 - 629\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2022.2136380\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2022.2136380","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

学术研究人员对管理工具的看法在文献中引发了重大争议。研究强调,这些认知比管理本身更能影响研究绩效。这项工作通过提出一种解释公立大学研究动机的主观测量方法来解决这个问题。该研究采用混合方法进行。为了初步确定研究动机,通过纳入62名专家进行了德尔菲研究。基于德尔菲结果,对西班牙一所大学的259名学术研究人员进行了探索性因素分析,以对比研究激励体系的内部构成。研究结果揭示了研究人员感知到的四种潜在激励因素。对这些因素的分析有助于就学术管理者如何促进研究人员假设和接受的有效激励措施的设计展开辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploratory analysis of the perception of academic researchers about incentives: evidence from a Spanish public university
ABSTRACT The perception of academic researchers on management instruments has generated significant controversy in the literature. Studies have highlighted that these perceptions affect research performance more than management itself. This work addresses this issue by proposing a subjective measurement that explains research incentives in a public university. The study was conducted using a mixed-methodology approach. To initially identify the research incentives, a Delphi study was developed through the inclusion of 62 experts. Based on the Delphi results, to contrast the internal composition of the research incentive system, 259 academic researchers from a Spanish university were subjected to an exploratory factor analysis. The results revealed four potential incentives that were perceived by the researchers. The analysis of these factors contributes to the debate about the way in which academic managers can promote the design of effective incentives that could be assumed and accepted by researchers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management
Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management is an international journal of professional experience and ideas in post-secondary education. It is a must read for those seeking to influence educational policy making. The journal also aims to be of use to managers and senior academic staff who seek to place their work and interests in a broad context and influence educational policy and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信