{"title":"雅加达公交私人有限公司货物和服务采购中串通投标的有效性(案例研究判决书编号:15/ kpu - i /2014)","authors":"Bella Rihandita Adella","doi":"10.20961/YUSTISIA.V7I3.21596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conspiracy in the tender including auction collusive tenders occuring through a deal between businessmen, between the owner of the work as well as between the two parties. The tender conspiracy case that happened in Indonesia is a case involving the Pte Ltd. Industri Kereta Api (Pte Ltd. INKA) in the procurement of Transjakarta fiscal of 2013. From the results of this research noted that enforcement of the law against the procurement of Transjakarta yet running optimally, where knowing the verdict matter passengers number: 15/KPPU-I/2014 in unfair business competition elements Law number 5 of 1999 can't show anyone others who benefited by Pte Ltd. INKA and profitable, as well as in the By Law 16 of Number 2018 on The President of Government procurement of goods/service stating Pte Ltd. INKA is not proven procurement tenders because collusion Pte Ltd. INKA do not know reasons of Pte Ltd. Mayapada Auto Sempurna resign therefore the Pte Ltd. INKA as winner in the tender Package I repeated Single Bus.","PeriodicalId":33244,"journal":{"name":"Yustisia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE VALIDITY OF THE COLLUSIVE TENDER IN THE PROCUREMENT OF GOODS AND SERVICES OF BUS TRANSJAKARTA Pte Ltd. (Case Study the Verdict Number: 15/KPPU-I/2014)\",\"authors\":\"Bella Rihandita Adella\",\"doi\":\"10.20961/YUSTISIA.V7I3.21596\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Conspiracy in the tender including auction collusive tenders occuring through a deal between businessmen, between the owner of the work as well as between the two parties. The tender conspiracy case that happened in Indonesia is a case involving the Pte Ltd. Industri Kereta Api (Pte Ltd. INKA) in the procurement of Transjakarta fiscal of 2013. From the results of this research noted that enforcement of the law against the procurement of Transjakarta yet running optimally, where knowing the verdict matter passengers number: 15/KPPU-I/2014 in unfair business competition elements Law number 5 of 1999 can't show anyone others who benefited by Pte Ltd. INKA and profitable, as well as in the By Law 16 of Number 2018 on The President of Government procurement of goods/service stating Pte Ltd. INKA is not proven procurement tenders because collusion Pte Ltd. INKA do not know reasons of Pte Ltd. Mayapada Auto Sempurna resign therefore the Pte Ltd. INKA as winner in the tender Package I repeated Single Bus.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33244,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Yustisia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Yustisia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20961/YUSTISIA.V7I3.21596\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yustisia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20961/YUSTISIA.V7I3.21596","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
投标中的串谋，包括拍卖，通过商人之间、作品所有人之间以及双方之间的交易进行的串谋投标。发生在印尼的投标串谋案是一个涉及Pte有限公司的案件。industrial Kereta Api (Pte Ltd.)INKA)在2013财政年度的雅加达运输采购中。从这项研究的结果中，我们注意到，针对雅加达Transjakarta采购的法律执行情况仍处于最佳状态，在不正当商业竞争要素中，1999年第5号法律不能显示任何其他从Pte Ltd受益的人。INKA和盈利，以及2018年第16号法律关于政府采购货物/服务的总统，说明Pte有限公司。INKA没有证明采购招标是因为勾结了私人有限公司。INKA不知道Pte Ltd的原因。Mayapada Auto Sempurna辞职，因此私人有限公司。INKA作为招标的赢家，我重复了单总线包。
THE VALIDITY OF THE COLLUSIVE TENDER IN THE PROCUREMENT OF GOODS AND SERVICES OF BUS TRANSJAKARTA Pte Ltd. (Case Study the Verdict Number: 15/KPPU-I/2014)
Conspiracy in the tender including auction collusive tenders occuring through a deal between businessmen, between the owner of the work as well as between the two parties. The tender conspiracy case that happened in Indonesia is a case involving the Pte Ltd. Industri Kereta Api (Pte Ltd. INKA) in the procurement of Transjakarta fiscal of 2013. From the results of this research noted that enforcement of the law against the procurement of Transjakarta yet running optimally, where knowing the verdict matter passengers number: 15/KPPU-I/2014 in unfair business competition elements Law number 5 of 1999 can't show anyone others who benefited by Pte Ltd. INKA and profitable, as well as in the By Law 16 of Number 2018 on The President of Government procurement of goods/service stating Pte Ltd. INKA is not proven procurement tenders because collusion Pte Ltd. INKA do not know reasons of Pte Ltd. Mayapada Auto Sempurna resign therefore the Pte Ltd. INKA as winner in the tender Package I repeated Single Bus.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
