非洲在国外攻读博士的经历:在更广泛的生活考虑中谈判职业

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
L. McAlpine, Otilia Chiramba, M. Keane
{"title":"非洲在国外攻读博士的经历:在更广泛的生活考虑中谈判职业","authors":"L. McAlpine, Otilia Chiramba, M. Keane","doi":"10.1108/sgpe-10-2021-0073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nMany nations, including African ones, view PhD graduates as a means to be more internationally competitive, and national policies may encourage outward mobility of potential PhDs, expecting that graduates on return will enhance the country’s capacity. Many studies of such mobility, as with studies of early career researchers generally, focus on their work-related experiences. That is, they do not incorporate the broader life considerations that can intersect with their work-career decisions. So, this study of 36 Africans who completed their PhDs abroad uses a framework that embedded an individual’s work within personal considerations, such as life goals, while not ignoring the structural factors, such as job availability, in play when making work-career decisions.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe paper used a narrative methodology, with two stages of analysis: first of individual cases, then of patterns across individuals.\n\n\nFindings\nMultiple personal factors came to bear in negotiating the structural factors related to work and career. Moreover, there were multiple intersections between personal factors, and the influence of a factor ranged from sustaining through disrupting, highlighting the specific context-bounded nature of the thinking at the time of decision-making.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis was a small-scale study with no intention to generalize to the broader population of African PhD holders. Rather but the goal was an in-depth examination of individual’s work within personal considerations to further conceptualize the understanding of career decision-making.\n\n\nPractical implications\nPhD programmes could encourage PhD students to consider the importance of life intentions and hopes in career decision-making and how careers evolve over time in light of structural and life factors.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nOverall, participants demonstrated an intricate weighing of personal factors in making decisions as they also sought to negotiate different structural factors to advance their careers. Further, no other studies the authors are aware of report how the same interacting factors can have a sustaining through disrupting influence dependent on specific contexts, thus further revealing how nested contexts and personal factors co-influence the work-career decisions that each individual makes.\n","PeriodicalId":42038,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"African experiences of doing PhDs abroad: Negotiating careers within broader life considerations\",\"authors\":\"L. McAlpine, Otilia Chiramba, M. Keane\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/sgpe-10-2021-0073\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nMany nations, including African ones, view PhD graduates as a means to be more internationally competitive, and national policies may encourage outward mobility of potential PhDs, expecting that graduates on return will enhance the country’s capacity. Many studies of such mobility, as with studies of early career researchers generally, focus on their work-related experiences. That is, they do not incorporate the broader life considerations that can intersect with their work-career decisions. So, this study of 36 Africans who completed their PhDs abroad uses a framework that embedded an individual’s work within personal considerations, such as life goals, while not ignoring the structural factors, such as job availability, in play when making work-career decisions.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThe paper used a narrative methodology, with two stages of analysis: first of individual cases, then of patterns across individuals.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nMultiple personal factors came to bear in negotiating the structural factors related to work and career. Moreover, there were multiple intersections between personal factors, and the influence of a factor ranged from sustaining through disrupting, highlighting the specific context-bounded nature of the thinking at the time of decision-making.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nThis was a small-scale study with no intention to generalize to the broader population of African PhD holders. Rather but the goal was an in-depth examination of individual’s work within personal considerations to further conceptualize the understanding of career decision-making.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nPhD programmes could encourage PhD students to consider the importance of life intentions and hopes in career decision-making and how careers evolve over time in light of structural and life factors.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nOverall, participants demonstrated an intricate weighing of personal factors in making decisions as they also sought to negotiate different structural factors to advance their careers. Further, no other studies the authors are aware of report how the same interacting factors can have a sustaining through disrupting influence dependent on specific contexts, thus further revealing how nested contexts and personal factors co-influence the work-career decisions that each individual makes.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":42038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/sgpe-10-2021-0073\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sgpe-10-2021-0073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的包括非洲国家在内的许多国家将博士毕业生视为提高国际竞争力的一种手段,国家政策可能会鼓励潜在博士的向外流动,期望毕业生回国后能提高国家的能力。许多关于这种流动性的研究,就像对早期职业研究人员的研究一样,都集中在他们与工作相关的经历上。也就是说,他们没有考虑到更广泛的生活因素,而这些因素可能与他们的工作和职业决策相交叉。因此,这项针对36名在国外完成博士学位的非洲人的研究使用了一个框架,该框架将个人的工作嵌入个人考虑因素中,如生活目标,同时在做出工作和职业决策时不忽视结构因素,如工作可得性。设计/方法论/方法这篇论文使用了叙事方法论,分为两个阶段进行分析:首先是个案分析,然后是个人模式分析。在与工作和职业相关的结构性因素的谈判中,出现了多种个人因素。此外,个人因素之间存在多个交叉点,一个因素的影响从持续到破坏,突出了决策时思维的特定语境限制性质。研究局限性/含义这是一项小规模研究,无意推广到更广泛的非洲博士生群体。相反,目标是在个人考虑的范围内深入研究个人的工作,以进一步概念化对职业决策的理解。实践意义博士课程可以鼓励博士生考虑生活意图和希望在职业决策中的重要性,以及职业如何根据结构和生活因素随时间发展。独创性/价值观总体而言,参与者在做出决策时表现出对个人因素的复杂权衡,同时他们还试图通过谈判不同的结构因素来推进自己的职业生涯。此外,作者所知的其他研究都没有报告相同的相互作用因素如何通过破坏依赖于特定环境的影响而产生持续的影响,从而进一步揭示嵌套环境和个人因素如何共同影响每个人做出的工作-职业决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
African experiences of doing PhDs abroad: Negotiating careers within broader life considerations
Purpose Many nations, including African ones, view PhD graduates as a means to be more internationally competitive, and national policies may encourage outward mobility of potential PhDs, expecting that graduates on return will enhance the country’s capacity. Many studies of such mobility, as with studies of early career researchers generally, focus on their work-related experiences. That is, they do not incorporate the broader life considerations that can intersect with their work-career decisions. So, this study of 36 Africans who completed their PhDs abroad uses a framework that embedded an individual’s work within personal considerations, such as life goals, while not ignoring the structural factors, such as job availability, in play when making work-career decisions. Design/methodology/approach The paper used a narrative methodology, with two stages of analysis: first of individual cases, then of patterns across individuals. Findings Multiple personal factors came to bear in negotiating the structural factors related to work and career. Moreover, there were multiple intersections between personal factors, and the influence of a factor ranged from sustaining through disrupting, highlighting the specific context-bounded nature of the thinking at the time of decision-making. Research limitations/implications This was a small-scale study with no intention to generalize to the broader population of African PhD holders. Rather but the goal was an in-depth examination of individual’s work within personal considerations to further conceptualize the understanding of career decision-making. Practical implications PhD programmes could encourage PhD students to consider the importance of life intentions and hopes in career decision-making and how careers evolve over time in light of structural and life factors. Originality/value Overall, participants demonstrated an intricate weighing of personal factors in making decisions as they also sought to negotiate different structural factors to advance their careers. Further, no other studies the authors are aware of report how the same interacting factors can have a sustaining through disrupting influence dependent on specific contexts, thus further revealing how nested contexts and personal factors co-influence the work-career decisions that each individual makes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education
Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信