关于空间和立体内容的首选耳机响应的差异

IF 1.1 4区 工程技术 Q3 ACOUSTICS
Isaac Engel, D. Alon, Kevin Scheumann, Jeff Crukley, Ravish Mehra
{"title":"关于空间和立体内容的首选耳机响应的差异","authors":"Isaac Engel, D. Alon, Kevin Scheumann, Jeff Crukley, Ravish Mehra","doi":"10.17743/jaes.2022.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When reproducing spatial audio over headphones, ensuring that these have a flat frequency response is important to produce an accurate rendering. However, previous studies suggest that, when reproducing nonspatial content such as stereo music, the headphone response should resemble that of a loudspeaker system in a listening room (e.g., the so-called Harman target). It is not yet clear whether a pair of headphones calibrated in such way would be preferred by listeners for spatial audio reproduction too. This study investigates how listeners’ preference regarding headphone frequency response differs in the cases of stereo and spatial audio content reproduction, rendered using individual binaural room impulse responses. Three listening tests that evaluate seven different target headphone responses, two headphones, and two reproduction bandwidths are presented with over 20 listeners per test. Results suggest that a flat headphone response is preferred when listening to spatial audio content, whereas the Harman target was preferred for stereo content. This effect was found to be stronger when user-specific equalization was used and was not significantly affected by the choice of headphone or reproduction bandwidth.","PeriodicalId":50008,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Audio Engineering Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Differences in Preferred Headphone Response for Spatial and Stereo Content\",\"authors\":\"Isaac Engel, D. Alon, Kevin Scheumann, Jeff Crukley, Ravish Mehra\",\"doi\":\"10.17743/jaes.2022.0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When reproducing spatial audio over headphones, ensuring that these have a flat frequency response is important to produce an accurate rendering. However, previous studies suggest that, when reproducing nonspatial content such as stereo music, the headphone response should resemble that of a loudspeaker system in a listening room (e.g., the so-called Harman target). It is not yet clear whether a pair of headphones calibrated in such way would be preferred by listeners for spatial audio reproduction too. This study investigates how listeners’ preference regarding headphone frequency response differs in the cases of stereo and spatial audio content reproduction, rendered using individual binaural room impulse responses. Three listening tests that evaluate seven different target headphone responses, two headphones, and two reproduction bandwidths are presented with over 20 listeners per test. Results suggest that a flat headphone response is preferred when listening to spatial audio content, whereas the Harman target was preferred for stereo content. This effect was found to be stronger when user-specific equalization was used and was not significantly affected by the choice of headphone or reproduction bandwidth.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50008,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Audio Engineering Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Audio Engineering Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17743/jaes.2022.0005\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Audio Engineering Society","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17743/jaes.2022.0005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

当通过耳机再现空间音频时,确保这些具有平坦的频率响应对于产生准确的渲染非常重要。然而,先前的研究表明,当再现非空间内容(如立体声音乐)时,耳机的响应应该类似于听音室中的扬声器系统(例如,所谓的哈曼目标)。目前还不清楚,一副以这种方式校准的耳机是否也会受到听众的青睐,用于空间音频再现。本研究调查了在立体声和空间音频内容再现的情况下,听众对耳机频率响应的偏好是如何不同的,使用单个双耳房间脉冲响应来呈现。三个听力测试,评估七个不同的目标耳机响应,两个耳机和两个复制带宽,每个测试有超过20个听众。结果表明,在听空间音频内容时,首选平坦耳机响应,而在听立体声内容时,首选哈曼目标。当使用用户特定的均衡时,发现这种效果更强,并且不受耳机或再现带宽选择的显着影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the Differences in Preferred Headphone Response for Spatial and Stereo Content
When reproducing spatial audio over headphones, ensuring that these have a flat frequency response is important to produce an accurate rendering. However, previous studies suggest that, when reproducing nonspatial content such as stereo music, the headphone response should resemble that of a loudspeaker system in a listening room (e.g., the so-called Harman target). It is not yet clear whether a pair of headphones calibrated in such way would be preferred by listeners for spatial audio reproduction too. This study investigates how listeners’ preference regarding headphone frequency response differs in the cases of stereo and spatial audio content reproduction, rendered using individual binaural room impulse responses. Three listening tests that evaluate seven different target headphone responses, two headphones, and two reproduction bandwidths are presented with over 20 listeners per test. Results suggest that a flat headphone response is preferred when listening to spatial audio content, whereas the Harman target was preferred for stereo content. This effect was found to be stronger when user-specific equalization was used and was not significantly affected by the choice of headphone or reproduction bandwidth.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Audio Engineering Society
Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 工程技术-工程:综合
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
53
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Audio Engineering Society — the official publication of the AES — is the only peer-reviewed journal devoted exclusively to audio technology. Published 10 times each year, it is available to all AES members and subscribers. The Journal contains state-of-the-art technical papers and engineering reports; feature articles covering timely topics; pre and post reports of AES conventions and other society activities; news from AES sections around the world; Standards and Education Committee work; membership news, patents, new products, and newsworthy developments in the field of audio.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信