实用主义反身性理论概述:通过社会理论探索反身性概念的路径

Q3 Social Sciences
D. Corrêa, V. Talone
{"title":"实用主义反身性理论概述:通过社会理论探索反身性概念的路径","authors":"D. Corrêa, V. Talone","doi":"10.1590/s0102-6992-202136020003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this article, we propose an understanding of reflexivity based on the effects of degrees of indeterminacy in the most diverse situations and contexts. We conducted an analysis based on a pragmatist sensibility to outline a model of reflexivity, examining how the concept has been thought in social theory. We explore the epistemological reflexivity (Pierre Bourdieu); the tradition that associates reflexivity and personal forms of internal deliberation (Margaret Archer); approaches connecting reflexivity with devices allowing an objective apprehension of the world (Bernard Lahire); and perspectives in which reflexive action is linked to indeterminacy (John Dewey; Luc Boltanski and Laurent Thévenot). We combine routine, experiences of destabilization, catastrophe, and different high levels of reflexivity, seeking to open social theory to new research agendas on reflexive action.","PeriodicalId":35260,"journal":{"name":"Sociedade e Estado","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An outline of a pragmatist theory on reflexivity: exploring the pathways of the concept through social theory\",\"authors\":\"D. Corrêa, V. Talone\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/s0102-6992-202136020003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In this article, we propose an understanding of reflexivity based on the effects of degrees of indeterminacy in the most diverse situations and contexts. We conducted an analysis based on a pragmatist sensibility to outline a model of reflexivity, examining how the concept has been thought in social theory. We explore the epistemological reflexivity (Pierre Bourdieu); the tradition that associates reflexivity and personal forms of internal deliberation (Margaret Archer); approaches connecting reflexivity with devices allowing an objective apprehension of the world (Bernard Lahire); and perspectives in which reflexive action is linked to indeterminacy (John Dewey; Luc Boltanski and Laurent Thévenot). We combine routine, experiences of destabilization, catastrophe, and different high levels of reflexivity, seeking to open social theory to new research agendas on reflexive action.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35260,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sociedade e Estado\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sociedade e Estado\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-6992-202136020003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociedade e Estado","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-6992-202136020003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在这篇文章中,我们提出了一种基于不确定性程度在最不同的情况和语境中的影响的反身性的理解。我们进行了一项基于实用主义敏感性的分析,概述了反身性模型,研究了社会理论中如何思考这一概念。我们探索认识论的反身性(皮埃尔·布迪厄);把反身性和个人形式的内在思考联系起来的传统(玛格丽特·阿切尔);将反身性与允许客观理解世界的手段联系起来的方法(伯纳德·拉希尔);以及将反身性行为与不确定性联系起来的观点(约翰·杜威;Luc Boltanski和Laurent thsamvenot)。我们将常规、不稳定、灾难的经验和不同水平的反身性结合起来,寻求将社会理论开放给新的反身行为研究议程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An outline of a pragmatist theory on reflexivity: exploring the pathways of the concept through social theory
Abstract In this article, we propose an understanding of reflexivity based on the effects of degrees of indeterminacy in the most diverse situations and contexts. We conducted an analysis based on a pragmatist sensibility to outline a model of reflexivity, examining how the concept has been thought in social theory. We explore the epistemological reflexivity (Pierre Bourdieu); the tradition that associates reflexivity and personal forms of internal deliberation (Margaret Archer); approaches connecting reflexivity with devices allowing an objective apprehension of the world (Bernard Lahire); and perspectives in which reflexive action is linked to indeterminacy (John Dewey; Luc Boltanski and Laurent Thévenot). We combine routine, experiences of destabilization, catastrophe, and different high levels of reflexivity, seeking to open social theory to new research agendas on reflexive action.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sociedade e Estado
Sociedade e Estado Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The review Sociedade e Estado has been edited by the Department of Sociology at the University of Brasilia since of 1986. In this period, original works related to Social Sciences were published in the following categories: theoretical studies, critical reviews of literature, research reports, technical reports, reviews and notices. Its abbreviated title is Soc. estado, which should be used in bibliographies, footnotes and bibliographical references and strips.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信