非裔美国人社区样本中基于HbA1C和空腹血糖的参与者分类和干预效果的差异

Lovoria B. Williams, S. Looney, A. Kriska
{"title":"非裔美国人社区样本中基于HbA1C和空腹血糖的参与者分类和干预效果的差异","authors":"Lovoria B. Williams, S. Looney, A. Kriska","doi":"10.32474/ADO.2018.01.000122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since 2010, the American Diabetes Association has endorsed both HbA1C (A1C) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) to determine diabetes risk. Given the discordance between classifications based on FPG and A1C and higher A1C levels among African Americans (AAs) than whites, we sought to examine the prevalence of normoglycemia, prediabetes, and diabetes among a community sample of adult AAs (n=704) screened for enrollment in a randomized Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP). We conducted a retrospective analysis to estimate the degree of discordance between risk categories based on FPG and A1C and examine the risk factors that predicted A1C and FPG levels. To determine differential effects on risk categories defined using FPG and A1C, we examined the effects of the program on the measures at 12 weeks post-intervention among the intervention arm participants.","PeriodicalId":93731,"journal":{"name":"Archives of diabetes & obesity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in participant classification and intervention effects based on HbA1C and fasting plasma glucose among a community sample of African Americans\",\"authors\":\"Lovoria B. Williams, S. Looney, A. Kriska\",\"doi\":\"10.32474/ADO.2018.01.000122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since 2010, the American Diabetes Association has endorsed both HbA1C (A1C) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) to determine diabetes risk. Given the discordance between classifications based on FPG and A1C and higher A1C levels among African Americans (AAs) than whites, we sought to examine the prevalence of normoglycemia, prediabetes, and diabetes among a community sample of adult AAs (n=704) screened for enrollment in a randomized Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP). We conducted a retrospective analysis to estimate the degree of discordance between risk categories based on FPG and A1C and examine the risk factors that predicted A1C and FPG levels. To determine differential effects on risk categories defined using FPG and A1C, we examined the effects of the program on the measures at 12 weeks post-intervention among the intervention arm participants.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93731,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of diabetes & obesity\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of diabetes & obesity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32474/ADO.2018.01.000122\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of diabetes & obesity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32474/ADO.2018.01.000122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自2010年以来,美国糖尿病协会已经认可HbA1C(A1C)和空腹血糖(FPG)来确定糖尿病风险。考虑到基于FPG和A1C的分类之间的不一致,以及非裔美国人(AAs)的A1C水平高于白人,我们试图在随机糖尿病预防计划(DPP)中筛选的成年AAs(n=704)的社区样本中检查血糖正常、糖尿病前期和糖尿病的患病率。我们进行了一项回顾性分析,以评估基于FPG和A1C的风险类别之间的不一致程度,并检查预测A1C和FPG水平的风险因素。为了确定对使用FPG和A1C定义的风险类别的不同影响,我们在干预组参与者中检查了干预后12周该计划对措施的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Differences in participant classification and intervention effects based on HbA1C and fasting plasma glucose among a community sample of African Americans
Since 2010, the American Diabetes Association has endorsed both HbA1C (A1C) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) to determine diabetes risk. Given the discordance between classifications based on FPG and A1C and higher A1C levels among African Americans (AAs) than whites, we sought to examine the prevalence of normoglycemia, prediabetes, and diabetes among a community sample of adult AAs (n=704) screened for enrollment in a randomized Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP). We conducted a retrospective analysis to estimate the degree of discordance between risk categories based on FPG and A1C and examine the risk factors that predicted A1C and FPG levels. To determine differential effects on risk categories defined using FPG and A1C, we examined the effects of the program on the measures at 12 weeks post-intervention among the intervention arm participants.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信