一项描述性研究评估本科医学生在生理学综合课程中对接受电子学习与传统方法的看法

S. Ali, Hifzur Rehman, P. Ba
{"title":"一项描述性研究评估本科医学生在生理学综合课程中对接受电子学习与传统方法的看法","authors":"S. Ali, Hifzur Rehman, P. Ba","doi":"10.37506/ijop.v9i4.3090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Institutions across the world have shifted to virtual education to keep the academic activitiesgoing due to the COVID-19 pandemic jeopardizing the academiccalendars. E-learning was being used asa part of distance learning courses but the preparedness, designing and effectiveness in using it towardsconducting regular courses have been the main concern in countries where students are not used to virtualclasses due to technical constraints like faculty training, suitability of devices and bandwidth availabilityposing a serious challenge. Methods: A cross-sectional, web-based study was done among 50 second yearmedical undergraduate students in 2020. A standardized, electronic, self-administered, Google Form datacollection sheet was distributed. It included the seven components to evaluate; Course Schedule, objectives,time management, teaching methods, assessment methods, academic achievement and student concerns.Descriptive, inferential statistics were applied. Results: e-learning has been accepted very well by thestudents (48%) and they found it to add as a better learning resource (44%). About 25% of students find bothe-leaning and conventional methods as convenient in learning.The major advantage in conventional methodswere due to peer interaction, student-faculty interaction and active participation of faculty with feedback.Conclusion: Most of the students appraised that e-learning can be used as complementary to conventionalmethods. The conventional methods had an upper hand in long term; teaching concepts, peer interaction andfaculty feedback with better planning and implementation of curricular activities holding the key for successin fulfilling the expected outcomes by either of the methods.","PeriodicalId":92916,"journal":{"name":"International journal of physiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Descriptive Study to Assess the Perceptions of Undergraduate Medical Students Towards Acceptance of E-Learning Vs Conventional Methods in An Integrated Curriculum in Physiology\",\"authors\":\"S. Ali, Hifzur Rehman, P. Ba\",\"doi\":\"10.37506/ijop.v9i4.3090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Institutions across the world have shifted to virtual education to keep the academic activitiesgoing due to the COVID-19 pandemic jeopardizing the academiccalendars. E-learning was being used asa part of distance learning courses but the preparedness, designing and effectiveness in using it towardsconducting regular courses have been the main concern in countries where students are not used to virtualclasses due to technical constraints like faculty training, suitability of devices and bandwidth availabilityposing a serious challenge. Methods: A cross-sectional, web-based study was done among 50 second yearmedical undergraduate students in 2020. A standardized, electronic, self-administered, Google Form datacollection sheet was distributed. It included the seven components to evaluate; Course Schedule, objectives,time management, teaching methods, assessment methods, academic achievement and student concerns.Descriptive, inferential statistics were applied. Results: e-learning has been accepted very well by thestudents (48%) and they found it to add as a better learning resource (44%). About 25% of students find bothe-leaning and conventional methods as convenient in learning.The major advantage in conventional methodswere due to peer interaction, student-faculty interaction and active participation of faculty with feedback.Conclusion: Most of the students appraised that e-learning can be used as complementary to conventionalmethods. The conventional methods had an upper hand in long term; teaching concepts, peer interaction andfaculty feedback with better planning and implementation of curricular activities holding the key for successin fulfilling the expected outcomes by either of the methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of physiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37506/ijop.v9i4.3090\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37506/ijop.v9i4.3090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于新冠肺炎疫情影响了学术日程,世界各地的机构都转向了虚拟教育,以保持学术活动的进行。电子学习已被用作远程学习课程的一部分,但在一些国家,由于教师培训、设备适用性和带宽可用性等技术限制,学生不习惯虚拟课程,因此将其用于常规课程的准备、设计和有效性一直是主要关注的问题。方法:对50名2020年医学本科二年级学生进行了一项基于网络的横断面研究。分发了一份标准化、电子、自我管理的谷歌表格数据收集表。它包括七个要评估的组成部分;课程安排、目标、时间管理、教学方法、评估方法、学习成绩和学生关注的问题。采用描述性、推断性统计。结果:学生对电子学习的接受程度很高(48%),他们认为电子学习是一种更好的学习资源(44%)。约25%的学生认为学习方法和传统方法都很方便。传统方法的主要优势在于同伴互动、师生互动以及教师的积极参与和反馈。结论:大多数学生认为网络学习可以作为传统方法的补充。从长期来看,传统方法具有优势;教学理念、同伴互动和教师反馈以及更好地规划和实施课程活动是两种方法成功实现预期结果的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Descriptive Study to Assess the Perceptions of Undergraduate Medical Students Towards Acceptance of E-Learning Vs Conventional Methods in An Integrated Curriculum in Physiology
Background: Institutions across the world have shifted to virtual education to keep the academic activitiesgoing due to the COVID-19 pandemic jeopardizing the academiccalendars. E-learning was being used asa part of distance learning courses but the preparedness, designing and effectiveness in using it towardsconducting regular courses have been the main concern in countries where students are not used to virtualclasses due to technical constraints like faculty training, suitability of devices and bandwidth availabilityposing a serious challenge. Methods: A cross-sectional, web-based study was done among 50 second yearmedical undergraduate students in 2020. A standardized, electronic, self-administered, Google Form datacollection sheet was distributed. It included the seven components to evaluate; Course Schedule, objectives,time management, teaching methods, assessment methods, academic achievement and student concerns.Descriptive, inferential statistics were applied. Results: e-learning has been accepted very well by thestudents (48%) and they found it to add as a better learning resource (44%). About 25% of students find bothe-leaning and conventional methods as convenient in learning.The major advantage in conventional methodswere due to peer interaction, student-faculty interaction and active participation of faculty with feedback.Conclusion: Most of the students appraised that e-learning can be used as complementary to conventionalmethods. The conventional methods had an upper hand in long term; teaching concepts, peer interaction andfaculty feedback with better planning and implementation of curricular activities holding the key for successin fulfilling the expected outcomes by either of the methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信