我们在腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术中采用三层三孔入路的初步经验

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Xin Wang, Youlu Lu, Zhouting Tuo, Liangkuan Bi
{"title":"我们在腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术中采用三层三孔入路的初步经验","authors":"Xin Wang, Youlu Lu, Zhouting Tuo, Liangkuan Bi","doi":"10.5114/wiitm.2021.105572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Radical cystectomy (RC) remains the gold standard for the treatment of recurrent high-risk non-muscle-infiltrating bladder cancer (BC) and muscle-infiltrating BC. Currently, there is no uniform standardized procedure for laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC). Aim To share our initial experience with the three layers with three-port approach for laparoscopic radical cystectomy (TLTPA-LRC) and to investigate its safety and effectiveness. Material and methods Between April 2017 and March 2020, 32 patients with bladder tumors underwent TLTPA-LRC, pelvic lymph node dissection, and extracorporeal construction of the Studer neobladder. The basic characteristics of the patients, clinical pathology, and perioperative and follow-up data were analyzed. We also describe our step-by-step surgical technique for TLTPA-LRC. Results The median operation time was 278.5 min (range: 221–346 min), and the mean estimated blood loss was 233.4 ml (102–445 ml). The rates of intraoperative blood transfusion and postoperative transportation to the intensive care unit after surgery were 12.5% and 100%, respectively. Postoperative pathology showed 7 cases of T1, 20 cases of T2, and 5 cases of T3. Lymph node dissection and surgical margins were both negative. During a median follow-up of 13.5 months, 4 patients had early complications (< 30 days) and no patients had major complications (grade ≥ 3). The patients are now alive without local metastasis and with satisfactory urinary control ability day and night. Conclusions Although the TLTPA-LRC approach requires a certain level of surgical proficiency, it is feasible and serves as a minimally invasive method for selected patients.","PeriodicalId":49361,"journal":{"name":"Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques","volume":"17 1","pages":"207 - 213"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Our initial experience with the three layers with three-port approach for laparoscopic radical cystectomy\",\"authors\":\"Xin Wang, Youlu Lu, Zhouting Tuo, Liangkuan Bi\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/wiitm.2021.105572\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction Radical cystectomy (RC) remains the gold standard for the treatment of recurrent high-risk non-muscle-infiltrating bladder cancer (BC) and muscle-infiltrating BC. Currently, there is no uniform standardized procedure for laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC). Aim To share our initial experience with the three layers with three-port approach for laparoscopic radical cystectomy (TLTPA-LRC) and to investigate its safety and effectiveness. Material and methods Between April 2017 and March 2020, 32 patients with bladder tumors underwent TLTPA-LRC, pelvic lymph node dissection, and extracorporeal construction of the Studer neobladder. The basic characteristics of the patients, clinical pathology, and perioperative and follow-up data were analyzed. We also describe our step-by-step surgical technique for TLTPA-LRC. Results The median operation time was 278.5 min (range: 221–346 min), and the mean estimated blood loss was 233.4 ml (102–445 ml). The rates of intraoperative blood transfusion and postoperative transportation to the intensive care unit after surgery were 12.5% and 100%, respectively. Postoperative pathology showed 7 cases of T1, 20 cases of T2, and 5 cases of T3. Lymph node dissection and surgical margins were both negative. During a median follow-up of 13.5 months, 4 patients had early complications (< 30 days) and no patients had major complications (grade ≥ 3). The patients are now alive without local metastasis and with satisfactory urinary control ability day and night. Conclusions Although the TLTPA-LRC approach requires a certain level of surgical proficiency, it is feasible and serves as a minimally invasive method for selected patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"207 - 213\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2021.105572\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2021.105572","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

根治性膀胱切除术(RC)仍然是治疗复发性高风险非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(BC)和肌肉浸润性膀胱癌的金标准。目前,腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术(LRC)没有统一的标准手术程序。目的总结腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术中三层三口入路的初步经验,探讨其安全性和有效性。材料与方法2017年4月至2020年3月,32例膀胱肿瘤患者接受了tlpa - lrc、盆腔淋巴结清扫和体外构建Studer新膀胱。分析患者的基本特征、临床病理、围手术期及随访资料。我们还介绍了tlpa - lrc的一步一步的手术技术。结果手术时间中位数为278.5 min(范围221 ~ 346 min),平均估计失血量233.4 ml (102 ~ 445 ml)。术中输血率为12.5%,术后转重症监护病房率为100%。术后病理显示T1 7例,T2 20例,T3 5例。淋巴结清扫和手术切缘均为阴性。在中位随访13.5个月期间,4例患者出现早期并发症(< 30天),无严重并发症(≥3级)。患者目前存活,无局部转移,昼夜尿控能力良好。结论TLTPA-LRC入路虽然需要一定的手术熟练程度,但在选定的患者中是可行的,是一种微创方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Our initial experience with the three layers with three-port approach for laparoscopic radical cystectomy
Introduction Radical cystectomy (RC) remains the gold standard for the treatment of recurrent high-risk non-muscle-infiltrating bladder cancer (BC) and muscle-infiltrating BC. Currently, there is no uniform standardized procedure for laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC). Aim To share our initial experience with the three layers with three-port approach for laparoscopic radical cystectomy (TLTPA-LRC) and to investigate its safety and effectiveness. Material and methods Between April 2017 and March 2020, 32 patients with bladder tumors underwent TLTPA-LRC, pelvic lymph node dissection, and extracorporeal construction of the Studer neobladder. The basic characteristics of the patients, clinical pathology, and perioperative and follow-up data were analyzed. We also describe our step-by-step surgical technique for TLTPA-LRC. Results The median operation time was 278.5 min (range: 221–346 min), and the mean estimated blood loss was 233.4 ml (102–445 ml). The rates of intraoperative blood transfusion and postoperative transportation to the intensive care unit after surgery were 12.5% and 100%, respectively. Postoperative pathology showed 7 cases of T1, 20 cases of T2, and 5 cases of T3. Lymph node dissection and surgical margins were both negative. During a median follow-up of 13.5 months, 4 patients had early complications (< 30 days) and no patients had major complications (grade ≥ 3). The patients are now alive without local metastasis and with satisfactory urinary control ability day and night. Conclusions Although the TLTPA-LRC approach requires a certain level of surgical proficiency, it is feasible and serves as a minimally invasive method for selected patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
23.50%
发文量
48
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques serves as a forum for exchange of multidisciplinary experiences in fields such as: surgery, gynaecology, urology, gastroenterology, neurosurgery, ENT surgery, cardiac surgery, anaesthesiology and radiology, as well as other branches of medicine dealing with miniinvasive techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信