探索疫苗信息如何在新南威尔士州公共图书馆传播:一项关于认知和实践的研究

IF 1 4区 管理学 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Kayla Stephanie Wallace
{"title":"探索疫苗信息如何在新南威尔士州公共图书馆传播:一项关于认知和实践的研究","authors":"Kayla Stephanie Wallace","doi":"10.1080/24750158.2022.2135360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT With COVID-19’s global impact and the increased demand for accurate, accessible vaccine messaging, public libraries – equipped with pre-existing infrastructure and trained information professionals – are uniquely positioned to address this need. However, studies have shown that these expectations rarely align with both past and current practice. This small exploratory study examines library practices alongside librarian perceptions in New South Wales, Australia with the goal of identifying whether they align and what key factors influence the communication of vaccine information. It reports on the findings of a three-strand investigation of library catalogues, websites, and interviews with current NSW public librarians. Ultimately, findings suggested that public libraries had taken few steps towards effectively communicating vaccine information during the early stages of the pandemic. While vaccine collections existed, they were limited in size, outdated, and predominantly print-based. Additionally, cataloguing practices made it difficult to discern anti-vaccine from pro-vaccine resources, while library websites offered minimal vaccine information and lacked accessibility for low literacy or non-English speaking users. These findings largely aligned with the perspectives of the interviewed librarians, who raised concerns regarding the size and accessibility of vaccine resource collections, the importance of expanding digital resources, and improving the communication of vaccine information.","PeriodicalId":53976,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association","volume":"71 1","pages":"328 - 355"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring How Vaccine Information is Communicated in NSW Public Libraries: A Study on Perceptions and Practice\",\"authors\":\"Kayla Stephanie Wallace\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24750158.2022.2135360\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT With COVID-19’s global impact and the increased demand for accurate, accessible vaccine messaging, public libraries – equipped with pre-existing infrastructure and trained information professionals – are uniquely positioned to address this need. However, studies have shown that these expectations rarely align with both past and current practice. This small exploratory study examines library practices alongside librarian perceptions in New South Wales, Australia with the goal of identifying whether they align and what key factors influence the communication of vaccine information. It reports on the findings of a three-strand investigation of library catalogues, websites, and interviews with current NSW public librarians. Ultimately, findings suggested that public libraries had taken few steps towards effectively communicating vaccine information during the early stages of the pandemic. While vaccine collections existed, they were limited in size, outdated, and predominantly print-based. Additionally, cataloguing practices made it difficult to discern anti-vaccine from pro-vaccine resources, while library websites offered minimal vaccine information and lacked accessibility for low literacy or non-English speaking users. These findings largely aligned with the perspectives of the interviewed librarians, who raised concerns regarding the size and accessibility of vaccine resource collections, the importance of expanding digital resources, and improving the communication of vaccine information.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"328 - 355\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24750158.2022.2135360\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24750158.2022.2135360","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要随着新冠肺炎的全球影响以及对准确、可获取疫苗信息的需求增加,配备了预先存在的基础设施和训练有素的信息专业人员的公共图书馆在满足这一需求方面处于独特的地位。然而,研究表明,这些期望很少与过去和现在的做法一致。这项小型探索性研究考察了澳大利亚新南威尔士州的图书馆实践和图书馆员的看法,目的是确定它们是否一致,以及哪些关键因素影响疫苗信息的传播。它报告了对图书馆目录、网站和新南威尔士州现任公共图书馆员访谈的三方面调查结果。最终,研究结果表明,在大流行的早期阶段,公共图书馆在有效传播疫苗信息方面几乎没有采取任何措施。虽然存在疫苗收藏,但它们的规模有限、过时,而且主要以印刷品为基础。此外,编目做法使人们很难区分反疫苗和支持疫苗的资源,而图书馆网站提供的疫苗信息很少,识字率低或非英语用户无法访问。这些发现在很大程度上与受访图书馆员的观点一致,他们对疫苗资源收藏的规模和可及性、扩大数字资源的重要性以及改善疫苗信息交流提出了担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring How Vaccine Information is Communicated in NSW Public Libraries: A Study on Perceptions and Practice
ABSTRACT With COVID-19’s global impact and the increased demand for accurate, accessible vaccine messaging, public libraries – equipped with pre-existing infrastructure and trained information professionals – are uniquely positioned to address this need. However, studies have shown that these expectations rarely align with both past and current practice. This small exploratory study examines library practices alongside librarian perceptions in New South Wales, Australia with the goal of identifying whether they align and what key factors influence the communication of vaccine information. It reports on the findings of a three-strand investigation of library catalogues, websites, and interviews with current NSW public librarians. Ultimately, findings suggested that public libraries had taken few steps towards effectively communicating vaccine information during the early stages of the pandemic. While vaccine collections existed, they were limited in size, outdated, and predominantly print-based. Additionally, cataloguing practices made it difficult to discern anti-vaccine from pro-vaccine resources, while library websites offered minimal vaccine information and lacked accessibility for low literacy or non-English speaking users. These findings largely aligned with the perspectives of the interviewed librarians, who raised concerns regarding the size and accessibility of vaccine resource collections, the importance of expanding digital resources, and improving the communication of vaccine information.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association
Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association is the flagship journal of the Australian Library and Information Association (ALIA). It is a quarterly publication for information science researchers, information professionals, related disciplines and industries. The Journal aims to stimulate discussion and inform practice by showcasing original peer reviewed research articles and other scholarly papers about, or relevant to, the Australian and Southern Asia Pacific regions. Authors from the full range of information professions and areas of scholarship are invited to contribute their work to the Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信