印度公民身份的碎片、合法性和社会创伤:国家公民登记

IF 1.5 Q2 GEOGRAPHY
Meghna Kajla, N. Jahan
{"title":"印度公民身份的碎片、合法性和社会创伤:国家公民登记","authors":"Meghna Kajla, N. Jahan","doi":"10.1080/08865655.2022.2115389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The article studies the process of National Register of citizens in relation to the changing Indian citizenship laws. Scholars note that the Indian citizenship was based on Jus Soli, but gradually it is changing to Jus Sanguinis which is leading to an exclusionary framework (Roy 2020; Jayal 2019a). The process of exclusion is based on ‘foreigner’, which is in constant flux in the context of post-colonial India. The foreigner as conceptualized by Assamese leadership is based on regional and historical markers, whereas the Indian state understands foreigner as ‘not Indian’. The article argues that the exercise of NRC is reformulating the conception of ‘foreigner’ and simultaneously introducing new forms of legality to acquire citizenship through the bureaucratic process of documentation. The article shows how citizenship laws are changing by taking region based specific concerns that are rooted in colonial history which are devising exclusionary forms of citizenship.","PeriodicalId":45999,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Borderlands Studies","volume":"38 1","pages":"637 - 656"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Splinters in the Citizenship of India, Legality, and Social Trauma: National Register of Citizens\",\"authors\":\"Meghna Kajla, N. Jahan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08865655.2022.2115389\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The article studies the process of National Register of citizens in relation to the changing Indian citizenship laws. Scholars note that the Indian citizenship was based on Jus Soli, but gradually it is changing to Jus Sanguinis which is leading to an exclusionary framework (Roy 2020; Jayal 2019a). The process of exclusion is based on ‘foreigner’, which is in constant flux in the context of post-colonial India. The foreigner as conceptualized by Assamese leadership is based on regional and historical markers, whereas the Indian state understands foreigner as ‘not Indian’. The article argues that the exercise of NRC is reformulating the conception of ‘foreigner’ and simultaneously introducing new forms of legality to acquire citizenship through the bureaucratic process of documentation. The article shows how citizenship laws are changing by taking region based specific concerns that are rooted in colonial history which are devising exclusionary forms of citizenship.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45999,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Borderlands Studies\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"637 - 656\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Borderlands Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2022.2115389\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Borderlands Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2022.2115389","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文研究了与印度国籍法变化相关的国家公民登记过程。学者们指出,印度公民身份是基于Soli正义,但逐渐转变为Jus Sanguinis,这导致了排他性框架(Roy 2020;Jayal 2019)。排斥的过程是基于“外国人”,这在后殖民印度的背景下不断变化。阿萨姆邦领导层对外国人的概念是基于地区和历史标志的,而印度政府则认为外国人“不是印度人”。文章认为,NRC的行使正在重新制定“外国人”的概念,同时通过官僚的文件程序引入新的合法性形式来获得公民身份。这篇文章展示了公民权法是如何变化的,它采用了根植于殖民历史的基于区域的具体关切,这些关切正在设计排他性的公民权形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Splinters in the Citizenship of India, Legality, and Social Trauma: National Register of Citizens
ABSTRACT The article studies the process of National Register of citizens in relation to the changing Indian citizenship laws. Scholars note that the Indian citizenship was based on Jus Soli, but gradually it is changing to Jus Sanguinis which is leading to an exclusionary framework (Roy 2020; Jayal 2019a). The process of exclusion is based on ‘foreigner’, which is in constant flux in the context of post-colonial India. The foreigner as conceptualized by Assamese leadership is based on regional and historical markers, whereas the Indian state understands foreigner as ‘not Indian’. The article argues that the exercise of NRC is reformulating the conception of ‘foreigner’ and simultaneously introducing new forms of legality to acquire citizenship through the bureaucratic process of documentation. The article shows how citizenship laws are changing by taking region based specific concerns that are rooted in colonial history which are devising exclusionary forms of citizenship.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信