衡量低收入和中等收入国家儿童早期发展:系统回顾

IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Journal of Early Childhood Research Pub Date : 2021-12-01 Epub Date: 2021-06-14 DOI:10.1177/1476718X211020031
Bernardita Munoz-Chereau, Lynn Ang, Julie Dockrell, Laura Outhwaite, Claire Heffernan
{"title":"衡量低收入和中等收入国家儿童早期发展:系统回顾","authors":"Bernardita Munoz-Chereau, Lynn Ang, Julie Dockrell, Laura Outhwaite, Claire Heffernan","doi":"10.1177/1476718X211020031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Sustainable Development Goals mandate that by 2030, all children should have access to quality early child development opportunities, healthcare and pre-primary education. Yet validated measures of ECD in low and middle income countries (LMICs) are rare. To address this gap, a Systematic Review (SR) of measures available to profile the development of children between the ages of 0-5 years in LMICs was undertaken. Drawing on education, psychology and health databases, we identified reliable, valid or measures adapted for use in LMICs for either assessments of children's development or their learning environments. The inclusion criteria were (1) peer reviewed papers published between January 2009 and May 2019; (2) assessment tools used to measure cognitive/language development or the early years or home environment in at least one LMIC; (3) report of the psychometric properties (validity and reliability) of the tool, and/or description of the cultural adaptability/translation process undertaken before applying it to a LMIC. Two hundred and forty-nine available records published in the last decade in peer-review journals and nine relevant systematic literature reviews were identified. Fifty-seven records were qualitatively synthesised based on their psychometric properties and cultural adaptation. Forty-three tools were reviewed utilising 12 criteria. Five elements of analysis present in Tables 2 and 3 (study, population tested, validity, reliability and cultural adaptability/translation) focused on the tools' psychometric properties and previous application in LMICs. A further seven dimensions outlined in Tables 4 and 5 identified specific characteristics of the tools from target age, administration method, domains, battery, accessibility, language and country/institution. We suggest these 12 key considerations for the selection of measurement tools that are applicable to effectively assess ECD in LMICs.</p>","PeriodicalId":46652,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Early Childhood Research","volume":"19 1","pages":"443-470"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12160078/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring early child development across low and middle-income countries: A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Bernardita Munoz-Chereau, Lynn Ang, Julie Dockrell, Laura Outhwaite, Claire Heffernan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1476718X211020031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Sustainable Development Goals mandate that by 2030, all children should have access to quality early child development opportunities, healthcare and pre-primary education. Yet validated measures of ECD in low and middle income countries (LMICs) are rare. To address this gap, a Systematic Review (SR) of measures available to profile the development of children between the ages of 0-5 years in LMICs was undertaken. Drawing on education, psychology and health databases, we identified reliable, valid or measures adapted for use in LMICs for either assessments of children's development or their learning environments. The inclusion criteria were (1) peer reviewed papers published between January 2009 and May 2019; (2) assessment tools used to measure cognitive/language development or the early years or home environment in at least one LMIC; (3) report of the psychometric properties (validity and reliability) of the tool, and/or description of the cultural adaptability/translation process undertaken before applying it to a LMIC. Two hundred and forty-nine available records published in the last decade in peer-review journals and nine relevant systematic literature reviews were identified. Fifty-seven records were qualitatively synthesised based on their psychometric properties and cultural adaptation. Forty-three tools were reviewed utilising 12 criteria. Five elements of analysis present in Tables 2 and 3 (study, population tested, validity, reliability and cultural adaptability/translation) focused on the tools' psychometric properties and previous application in LMICs. A further seven dimensions outlined in Tables 4 and 5 identified specific characteristics of the tools from target age, administration method, domains, battery, accessibility, language and country/institution. We suggest these 12 key considerations for the selection of measurement tools that are applicable to effectively assess ECD in LMICs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Early Childhood Research\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"443-470\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12160078/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Early Childhood Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X211020031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/6/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Early Childhood Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X211020031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/6/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

可持续发展目标规定,到2030年,所有儿童都应获得高质量的儿童早期发展机会、保健和学前教育。然而,在低收入和中等收入国家,经验证的幼儿发展措施很少。为了解决这一差距,对中低收入国家0-5岁儿童发展状况的现有措施进行了系统审查(SR)。根据教育、心理学和健康数据库,我们确定了可靠、有效或适合中低收入国家使用的措施,用于评估儿童的发展或他们的学习环境。纳入标准为:(1)2009年1月至2019年5月间发表的同行评议论文;(2)用于衡量至少一个低收入国家儿童早期或家庭环境的认知/语言发展的评估工具;(3)该工具的心理测量特性(效度和信度)报告,和/或在将其应用于LMIC之前所进行的文化适应性/翻译过程的描述。在过去十年中,在同行评议期刊上发表的249份可用记录和9份相关的系统文献综述被确定。57份记录根据其心理测量特性和文化适应性进行定性合成。利用12项标准审查了43种工具。表2和表3中的五个分析要素(研究、人口测试、效度、信度和文化适应性/翻译)侧重于工具的心理测量特性和以前在中低收入国家的应用。表4和表5列出的另外七个维度确定了工具的具体特征,包括目标年龄、管理方法、领域、电池、可访问性、语言和国家/机构。我们建议在选择测量工具时考虑以下12个关键因素,这些工具适用于有效评估中低收入国家的ECD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Measuring early child development across low and middle-income countries: A systematic review.

Measuring early child development across low and middle-income countries: A systematic review.

Measuring early child development across low and middle-income countries: A systematic review.

Measuring early child development across low and middle-income countries: A systematic review.

The Sustainable Development Goals mandate that by 2030, all children should have access to quality early child development opportunities, healthcare and pre-primary education. Yet validated measures of ECD in low and middle income countries (LMICs) are rare. To address this gap, a Systematic Review (SR) of measures available to profile the development of children between the ages of 0-5 years in LMICs was undertaken. Drawing on education, psychology and health databases, we identified reliable, valid or measures adapted for use in LMICs for either assessments of children's development or their learning environments. The inclusion criteria were (1) peer reviewed papers published between January 2009 and May 2019; (2) assessment tools used to measure cognitive/language development or the early years or home environment in at least one LMIC; (3) report of the psychometric properties (validity and reliability) of the tool, and/or description of the cultural adaptability/translation process undertaken before applying it to a LMIC. Two hundred and forty-nine available records published in the last decade in peer-review journals and nine relevant systematic literature reviews were identified. Fifty-seven records were qualitatively synthesised based on their psychometric properties and cultural adaptation. Forty-three tools were reviewed utilising 12 criteria. Five elements of analysis present in Tables 2 and 3 (study, population tested, validity, reliability and cultural adaptability/translation) focused on the tools' psychometric properties and previous application in LMICs. A further seven dimensions outlined in Tables 4 and 5 identified specific characteristics of the tools from target age, administration method, domains, battery, accessibility, language and country/institution. We suggest these 12 key considerations for the selection of measurement tools that are applicable to effectively assess ECD in LMICs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Early Childhood Research
Journal of Early Childhood Research EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Journal of Early Childhood Research provides an international forum for the dissemination of early childhood research which transcends disciplinary boundaries and applies theory and research within academic and professional communities. The journal reflects international growth in research on young children’s learning and development and the impact of this on provision. The journal enjoys a wide readership which includes policy-makers, practitioners and researchers in the intersecting fields of early childhood education and care, with early childhood defined as the years from birth to eight.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信