确保医疗保健中的人工智能可解释性:问题和可能的政策解决方案

IF 1.8 Q1 LAW
Tatiana de Campos Aranovich, R. Matulionyte
{"title":"确保医疗保健中的人工智能可解释性:问题和可能的政策解决方案","authors":"Tatiana de Campos Aranovich, R. Matulionyte","doi":"10.1080/13600834.2022.2146395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT AI promises to address health services’ quality and cost challenges, however, errors and bias in medical devices decisions pose threats to human health and life. This has also led to the lack of trust in AI medical devices among clinicians and patients. The goal of this article is to assess whether AI explainability principle established in numerous ethical AI frameworks can help address these and other challenges posed by AI medical devices. We first define the AI explainability principle, delineate it from the AI transparency principle, and examine which stakeholders in healthcare sector would need AI to be explainable and for what purpose. Second, we analyze whether explainable AI in healthcare is capable of achieving its intended goals. Finally, we examine robust regulatory approval framework as an alternative – and a more suitable – way in addressing challenges caused by black-box AI.","PeriodicalId":44342,"journal":{"name":"Information & Communications Technology Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ensuring AI explainability in healthcare: problems and possible policy solutions\",\"authors\":\"Tatiana de Campos Aranovich, R. Matulionyte\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13600834.2022.2146395\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT AI promises to address health services’ quality and cost challenges, however, errors and bias in medical devices decisions pose threats to human health and life. This has also led to the lack of trust in AI medical devices among clinicians and patients. The goal of this article is to assess whether AI explainability principle established in numerous ethical AI frameworks can help address these and other challenges posed by AI medical devices. We first define the AI explainability principle, delineate it from the AI transparency principle, and examine which stakeholders in healthcare sector would need AI to be explainable and for what purpose. Second, we analyze whether explainable AI in healthcare is capable of achieving its intended goals. Finally, we examine robust regulatory approval framework as an alternative – and a more suitable – way in addressing challenges caused by black-box AI.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44342,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information & Communications Technology Law\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information & Communications Technology Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2022.2146395\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information & Communications Technology Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2022.2146395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要人工智能有望解决医疗服务的质量和成本挑战,然而,医疗器械决策中的错误和偏见对人类健康和生命构成了威胁。这也导致临床医生和患者对人工智能医疗设备缺乏信任。本文的目标是评估在众多伦理人工智能框架中建立的人工智能可解释性原则是否有助于解决人工智能医疗设备带来的这些和其他挑战。我们首先定义了人工智能可解释性原则,从人工智能透明度原则中对其进行了描述,并考察了医疗保健部门的哪些利益相关者需要人工智能进行解释,以及出于什么目的。其次,我们分析了医疗保健中可解释的人工智能是否能够实现其预期目标。最后,我们研究了稳健的监管审批框架,将其作为解决黑匣子人工智能带来的挑战的替代方案,也是一种更合适的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ensuring AI explainability in healthcare: problems and possible policy solutions
ABSTRACT AI promises to address health services’ quality and cost challenges, however, errors and bias in medical devices decisions pose threats to human health and life. This has also led to the lack of trust in AI medical devices among clinicians and patients. The goal of this article is to assess whether AI explainability principle established in numerous ethical AI frameworks can help address these and other challenges posed by AI medical devices. We first define the AI explainability principle, delineate it from the AI transparency principle, and examine which stakeholders in healthcare sector would need AI to be explainable and for what purpose. Second, we analyze whether explainable AI in healthcare is capable of achieving its intended goals. Finally, we examine robust regulatory approval framework as an alternative – and a more suitable – way in addressing challenges caused by black-box AI.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The last decade has seen the introduction of computers and information technology at many levels of human transaction. Information technology (IT) is now used for data collation, in daily commercial transactions like transfer of funds, conclusion of contract, and complex diagnostic purposes in fields such as law, medicine and transport. The use of IT has expanded rapidly with the introduction of multimedia and the Internet. Any new technology inevitably raises a number of questions ranging from the legal to the ethical and the social. Information & Communications Technology Law covers topics such as: the implications of IT for legal processes and legal decision-making and related ethical and social issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信