一致性分析法(CA)在胶粉和碳纤维增强沥青混合料优选中的应用

IF 0.8 Q4 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
M. Zarei, B. Mirbaha, F. Akbarinia, Z. Rahmani, M. Zahedi, A. Zarei
{"title":"一致性分析法(CA)在胶粉和碳纤维增强沥青混合料优选中的应用","authors":"M. Zarei, B. Mirbaha, F. Akbarinia, Z. Rahmani, M. Zahedi, A. Zarei","doi":"10.56748/ejse.20246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Unlike the conducted studies in the field of reinforcing the asphaltic mixture, this research has used the multi-criteria decision-making method to determine the optimal percentage of the asphalt mix, which was reinforced with rubber powder and carbon fibers. After adding different percentages of two kinds of additives, i.e. rubber powder and carbon fibers conjointly, conducting Marshall Tests, analyzing the data and plotting the needed diagrams, it was observed that adding these two additives leads to a change in the results of Marshall Tests. Analyzing the diagrams, the optimal percentages for combining the rubber powder with carbon fibers were obtained, 15% and 0.5%, respectively having the best effect on the asphalt mix. Subsequently, the extra cost caused by adding the additives to the asphalt was evaluated by conducting an economic analysis. Then, six Mar-shall Parameters were used as six indices in the concordance analysis method, which is a multi-criterion decision-making method. Ultimately, the superior alternatives were proposed according to the results of the ranking. Ac-cording to the results, the suggested alternatives differed from the estimated alternative and the concordance analysis method proposed better alternatives.","PeriodicalId":52513,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Journal of Structural Engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of concordance analysis method (CA) for optimal selection of asphalt mixtures reinforced with rubber powder and carbon fiber\",\"authors\":\"M. Zarei, B. Mirbaha, F. Akbarinia, Z. Rahmani, M. Zahedi, A. Zarei\",\"doi\":\"10.56748/ejse.20246\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Unlike the conducted studies in the field of reinforcing the asphaltic mixture, this research has used the multi-criteria decision-making method to determine the optimal percentage of the asphalt mix, which was reinforced with rubber powder and carbon fibers. After adding different percentages of two kinds of additives, i.e. rubber powder and carbon fibers conjointly, conducting Marshall Tests, analyzing the data and plotting the needed diagrams, it was observed that adding these two additives leads to a change in the results of Marshall Tests. Analyzing the diagrams, the optimal percentages for combining the rubber powder with carbon fibers were obtained, 15% and 0.5%, respectively having the best effect on the asphalt mix. Subsequently, the extra cost caused by adding the additives to the asphalt was evaluated by conducting an economic analysis. Then, six Mar-shall Parameters were used as six indices in the concordance analysis method, which is a multi-criterion decision-making method. Ultimately, the superior alternatives were proposed according to the results of the ranking. Ac-cording to the results, the suggested alternatives differed from the estimated alternative and the concordance analysis method proposed better alternatives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electronic Journal of Structural Engineering\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electronic Journal of Structural Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56748/ejse.20246\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Journal of Structural Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56748/ejse.20246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

与在沥青混合料补强领域进行的研究不同,本研究使用了多准则决策方法来确定用胶粉和碳纤维补强的沥青混合料的最佳百分比。在加入不同百分比的两种添加剂,即胶粉和碳纤维,进行马歇尔试验,分析数据并绘制所需的图表后,观察到加入这两种添加剂会导致马歇尔试验结果的变化。通过对图表的分析,得出了胶粉与碳纤维结合的最佳比例,分别为15%和0.5%,对沥青混合料的效果最好。随后,通过进行经济分析来评估在沥青中添加添加剂所引起的额外成本。在此基础上,采用6个Mar-shell参数作为多准则决策方法中的6个指标。最终,根据排名结果提出了更优的备选方案。根据结果,建议的备选方案与估计的备选方案不同,一致性分析方法提出了更好的备选方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Application of concordance analysis method (CA) for optimal selection of asphalt mixtures reinforced with rubber powder and carbon fiber
Unlike the conducted studies in the field of reinforcing the asphaltic mixture, this research has used the multi-criteria decision-making method to determine the optimal percentage of the asphalt mix, which was reinforced with rubber powder and carbon fibers. After adding different percentages of two kinds of additives, i.e. rubber powder and carbon fibers conjointly, conducting Marshall Tests, analyzing the data and plotting the needed diagrams, it was observed that adding these two additives leads to a change in the results of Marshall Tests. Analyzing the diagrams, the optimal percentages for combining the rubber powder with carbon fibers were obtained, 15% and 0.5%, respectively having the best effect on the asphalt mix. Subsequently, the extra cost caused by adding the additives to the asphalt was evaluated by conducting an economic analysis. Then, six Mar-shall Parameters were used as six indices in the concordance analysis method, which is a multi-criterion decision-making method. Ultimately, the superior alternatives were proposed according to the results of the ranking. Ac-cording to the results, the suggested alternatives differed from the estimated alternative and the concordance analysis method proposed better alternatives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Electronic Journal of Structural Engineering
Electronic Journal of Structural Engineering Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Electronic Journal of Structural Engineering (EJSE) is an international forum for the dissemination and discussion of leading edge research and practical applications in Structural Engineering. It comprises peer-reviewed technical papers, discussions and comments, and also news about conferences, workshops etc. in Structural Engineering. Original papers are invited from individuals involved in the field of structural engineering and construction. The areas of special interests include the following, but are not limited to: Analytical and design methods Bridges and High-rise Buildings Case studies and failure investigation Innovations in design and new technology New Construction Materials Performance of Structures Prefabrication Technology Repairs, Strengthening, and Maintenance Stability and Scaffolding Engineering Soil-structure interaction Standards and Codes of Practice Structural and solid mechanics Structural Safety and Reliability Testing Technologies Vibration, impact and structural dynamics Wind and earthquake engineering. EJSE is seeking original papers (research or state-of the art reviews) of the highest quality for consideration for publication. The papers will be published within 3 to 6 months. The papers are expected to make a significant contribution to the research and development activities of the academic and professional engineering community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信