高冲突离异父母间的沟通模式:媒介多元性与方式转换的作用探讨

IF 2.2 Q2 COMMUNICATION
Bruce M. Smyth, Giverney Ainscough, J. Payne
{"title":"高冲突离异父母间的沟通模式:媒介多元性与方式转换的作用探讨","authors":"Bruce M. Smyth, Giverney Ainscough, J. Payne","doi":"10.1080/15267431.2020.1754826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Much of the work on media multiplexity theory (MMT) is based on unestablished relationships, in which more channels are presumed to be indicative of higher relational closeness. But a different set of relational dynamics may be at play in preexisting acrimonious partnerships. In this article, we investigate the use of different modes of communication by high-conflict separated parents (media multiplexity), and map changes in modes of communication (modality switching). Qualitative data from 68 separated parents in Australia who reported chronic parental acrimony suggest that a considerable amount of modality switching occurred post-separation. Consistent with MMT, multiplexity was evident but the degree of multiplexity was not as clearly related with the degree of closeness in the co-parental relationship as would be otherwise predicted by MMT. Recent insights into more pernicious forms of family dynamics set an important challenge for communication theories to better account for ex-couple motivational complexities.","PeriodicalId":46648,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF FAMILY COMMUNICATION","volume":"20 1","pages":"189 - 205"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15267431.2020.1754826","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modes of Communication between High-Conflict Separated Parents: Exploring the Role of Media Multiplexity and Modality Switching\",\"authors\":\"Bruce M. Smyth, Giverney Ainscough, J. Payne\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15267431.2020.1754826\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Much of the work on media multiplexity theory (MMT) is based on unestablished relationships, in which more channels are presumed to be indicative of higher relational closeness. But a different set of relational dynamics may be at play in preexisting acrimonious partnerships. In this article, we investigate the use of different modes of communication by high-conflict separated parents (media multiplexity), and map changes in modes of communication (modality switching). Qualitative data from 68 separated parents in Australia who reported chronic parental acrimony suggest that a considerable amount of modality switching occurred post-separation. Consistent with MMT, multiplexity was evident but the degree of multiplexity was not as clearly related with the degree of closeness in the co-parental relationship as would be otherwise predicted by MMT. Recent insights into more pernicious forms of family dynamics set an important challenge for communication theories to better account for ex-couple motivational complexities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF FAMILY COMMUNICATION\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"189 - 205\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15267431.2020.1754826\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF FAMILY COMMUNICATION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2020.1754826\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF FAMILY COMMUNICATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2020.1754826","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

媒体多重性理论(MMT)的大部分工作都是基于未建立的关系,在这种关系中,更多的渠道被认为是更高关系亲密度的标志。但是,一组不同的关系动力可能在先前存在的激烈伙伴关系中发挥作用。在本文中,我们研究了高冲突离异父母使用不同的沟通模式(媒体多重性),并绘制了沟通模式的变化(模式切换)。来自澳大利亚68名分居父母的定性数据表明,他们长期的父母争吵表明,相当多的模式转换发生在分居后。与MMT一致,多重性是明显的,但多重性的程度与共同父母关系中的亲密程度的关系并不像MMT预测的那样明显。最近对更有害的家庭动态形式的见解,对沟通理论提出了一个重要挑战,即更好地解释前夫妻动机的复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modes of Communication between High-Conflict Separated Parents: Exploring the Role of Media Multiplexity and Modality Switching
ABSTRACT Much of the work on media multiplexity theory (MMT) is based on unestablished relationships, in which more channels are presumed to be indicative of higher relational closeness. But a different set of relational dynamics may be at play in preexisting acrimonious partnerships. In this article, we investigate the use of different modes of communication by high-conflict separated parents (media multiplexity), and map changes in modes of communication (modality switching). Qualitative data from 68 separated parents in Australia who reported chronic parental acrimony suggest that a considerable amount of modality switching occurred post-separation. Consistent with MMT, multiplexity was evident but the degree of multiplexity was not as clearly related with the degree of closeness in the co-parental relationship as would be otherwise predicted by MMT. Recent insights into more pernicious forms of family dynamics set an important challenge for communication theories to better account for ex-couple motivational complexities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信