信教与否有关系吗?社区筹款活动的质性调查

IF 2.4 Q3 BUSINESS
Ridvan Kocaman, Müjdat Özmen, B. Erdoğan
{"title":"信教与否有关系吗?社区筹款活动的质性调查","authors":"Ridvan Kocaman, Müjdat Özmen, B. Erdoğan","doi":"10.1108/jec-10-2022-0167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nIn the extant literature, the concepts of charity and philanthropy have been differentiated based on the belief that charity stems from religious motivations and philanthropy is often secular in origin. Accordingly, this paper aims to investigate whether there is a distinction between managerial practices regarding the given concepts as emphasized in the conceptual discussions.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nTo see the managerial practices, the authors determined bazaars, community fundraising events organized by nonprofit organizations (NPOs), as the research field. Then, this study followed the general systematic of qualitative research. Accordingly, the authors conducted 44 interviews with experienced bazaar organizers from 10 NPOs in total. Furthermore, four days of participant observation with field notes were made in each bazaar, which lasted from 7 to 10 days. This study also used archival data as a secondary data source and then analyzed all data with a content analysis technique.\n\n\nFindings\nThis study found that the field practices mainly do not support the distinction drawn over the conceptual discussions. Both concepts are nouns describing the act of giving and helping the needy. They are actively performed based on different motives (religion-based and secular).\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe relevant distinction is limited to the conceptual discussions and has not been supported by the findings obtained from the field. Also, most of the studies on helping were carried out in the Western context. Studies conducted outside these cultures are quite limited. The value of the current study lies in the fact that it was conducted in a cultural context different from the Western cultures and paves the pathway for future research.\n","PeriodicalId":46489,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Enterprising Communities-People and Places in the Global Economy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does being religious or not matter? A qualitative investigation of community fundraising events\",\"authors\":\"Ridvan Kocaman, Müjdat Özmen, B. Erdoğan\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jec-10-2022-0167\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nIn the extant literature, the concepts of charity and philanthropy have been differentiated based on the belief that charity stems from religious motivations and philanthropy is often secular in origin. Accordingly, this paper aims to investigate whether there is a distinction between managerial practices regarding the given concepts as emphasized in the conceptual discussions.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nTo see the managerial practices, the authors determined bazaars, community fundraising events organized by nonprofit organizations (NPOs), as the research field. Then, this study followed the general systematic of qualitative research. Accordingly, the authors conducted 44 interviews with experienced bazaar organizers from 10 NPOs in total. Furthermore, four days of participant observation with field notes were made in each bazaar, which lasted from 7 to 10 days. This study also used archival data as a secondary data source and then analyzed all data with a content analysis technique.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThis study found that the field practices mainly do not support the distinction drawn over the conceptual discussions. Both concepts are nouns describing the act of giving and helping the needy. They are actively performed based on different motives (religion-based and secular).\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThe relevant distinction is limited to the conceptual discussions and has not been supported by the findings obtained from the field. Also, most of the studies on helping were carried out in the Western context. Studies conducted outside these cultures are quite limited. The value of the current study lies in the fact that it was conducted in a cultural context different from the Western cultures and paves the pathway for future research.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":46489,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Enterprising Communities-People and Places in the Global Economy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Enterprising Communities-People and Places in the Global Economy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jec-10-2022-0167\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Enterprising Communities-People and Places in the Global Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jec-10-2022-0167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的在现存的文献中,慈善和慈善的概念是基于这样一种信念而区分的,即慈善源于宗教动机,慈善往往起源于世俗。因此,本文旨在调查在概念讨论中强调的关于给定概念的管理实践之间是否存在区别。设计/方法论/方法为了了解管理实践,作者将非营利组织组织的社区筹款活动集市确定为研究领域。然后,本研究遵循一般系统的定性研究。因此,作者对来自总共10个非营利组织的经验丰富的集市组织者进行了44次采访。此外,每个集市都进行了为期四天的参与者观察和实地考察,观察时间从7日到10日 天。这项研究还使用档案数据作为二级数据源,然后使用内容分析技术分析所有数据。研究发现,实地实践主要不支持对概念讨论的区分。这两个概念都是描述给予和帮助穷人行为的名词。它们是基于不同的动机(基于宗教和世俗)积极进行的。独创性/价值相关的区别仅限于概念讨论,并没有得到该领域研究结果的支持。此外,大多数关于帮助的研究都是在西方背景下进行的。在这些文化之外进行的研究相当有限。当前研究的价值在于,它是在不同于西方文化的文化背景下进行的,并为未来的研究铺平了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does being religious or not matter? A qualitative investigation of community fundraising events
Purpose In the extant literature, the concepts of charity and philanthropy have been differentiated based on the belief that charity stems from religious motivations and philanthropy is often secular in origin. Accordingly, this paper aims to investigate whether there is a distinction between managerial practices regarding the given concepts as emphasized in the conceptual discussions. Design/methodology/approach To see the managerial practices, the authors determined bazaars, community fundraising events organized by nonprofit organizations (NPOs), as the research field. Then, this study followed the general systematic of qualitative research. Accordingly, the authors conducted 44 interviews with experienced bazaar organizers from 10 NPOs in total. Furthermore, four days of participant observation with field notes were made in each bazaar, which lasted from 7 to 10 days. This study also used archival data as a secondary data source and then analyzed all data with a content analysis technique. Findings This study found that the field practices mainly do not support the distinction drawn over the conceptual discussions. Both concepts are nouns describing the act of giving and helping the needy. They are actively performed based on different motives (religion-based and secular). Originality/value The relevant distinction is limited to the conceptual discussions and has not been supported by the findings obtained from the field. Also, most of the studies on helping were carried out in the Western context. Studies conducted outside these cultures are quite limited. The value of the current study lies in the fact that it was conducted in a cultural context different from the Western cultures and paves the pathway for future research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信