有心理健康治疗要求的社区判决;罪犯心理治疗体验探析

IF 2.1 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Lauren V Butler, S. Ledwith
{"title":"有心理健康治疗要求的社区判决;罪犯心理治疗体验探析","authors":"Lauren V Butler, S. Ledwith","doi":"10.1108/JCP-09-2020-0040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to explore service users’ experience of psychological therapy as part of a community sentence with a Mental Health Treatment Requirement (MHTR) in Birmingham Courts between January and December 2018.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nAll service users that had therapy in this period were telephoned a month after ending and offered a semi-structured telephone interview. Seven service users agreed to be recorded. This data was then transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis to gain a richer understanding of their lived experience.\n\n\nFindings\nThemes identified were: Is the MHTR for me? Opening up, enlightening connections and personal change. Service users initially questioned the relevance and burden of the order for them; the experience of therapy allowed them to trust and talk about things unsaid in the past; this helped them to review and reconsider their understanding of themselves and their life choices and what further support they might need.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nInterviews were not completed by an independent interviewer. Experience of working with offender manager supervision additionally available throughout the sentence was not explored.\n\n\nPractical implications\nWhat is included in the MHTR information and support needs to be informed by the service user’s perspective, including this can improve engagement.\n\n\nSocial implications\nTherapy was seen as a “a cog in the machine” and wider social inequalities may need to be addressed within the sentence.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis report focusses on experience of a therapeutic intervention – a key part of a community sentence with an MHTR.\n","PeriodicalId":44013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Criminal Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Community sentence with Mental Health Treatment Requirement (MHTR); an exploration into offenders’ experience of psychological therapy\",\"authors\":\"Lauren V Butler, S. Ledwith\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/JCP-09-2020-0040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis study aims to explore service users’ experience of psychological therapy as part of a community sentence with a Mental Health Treatment Requirement (MHTR) in Birmingham Courts between January and December 2018.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nAll service users that had therapy in this period were telephoned a month after ending and offered a semi-structured telephone interview. Seven service users agreed to be recorded. This data was then transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis to gain a richer understanding of their lived experience.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThemes identified were: Is the MHTR for me? Opening up, enlightening connections and personal change. Service users initially questioned the relevance and burden of the order for them; the experience of therapy allowed them to trust and talk about things unsaid in the past; this helped them to review and reconsider their understanding of themselves and their life choices and what further support they might need.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nInterviews were not completed by an independent interviewer. Experience of working with offender manager supervision additionally available throughout the sentence was not explored.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nWhat is included in the MHTR information and support needs to be informed by the service user’s perspective, including this can improve engagement.\\n\\n\\nSocial implications\\nTherapy was seen as a “a cog in the machine” and wider social inequalities may need to be addressed within the sentence.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis report focusses on experience of a therapeutic intervention – a key part of a community sentence with an MHTR.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":44013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Criminal Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Criminal Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/JCP-09-2020-0040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Criminal Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JCP-09-2020-0040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的本研究旨在探讨2018年1月至12月期间,伯明翰法院根据心理健康治疗要求(MHTR)对服务用户进行心理治疗的社区判决的体验。设计/方法/方法所有在此期间接受治疗的服务用户在结束后一个月打电话,并接受半结构化电话采访。七名服务用户同意进行记录。然后,这些数据被转录并使用主题分析进行分析,以更深入地了解他们的生活经历。发现的主题是:MHTR适合我吗?开放,启发联系和个人改变。服务用户最初质疑订单对他们的相关性和负担;治疗的经验使他们能够信任和谈论过去没有说过的事情;这有助于他们回顾和重新考虑他们对自己和生活选择的理解,以及他们可能需要什么进一步的支持。研究局限性/含义面试不是由独立的面试官完成的。没有探讨在整个刑期内与罪犯管理人员一起工作的经验。实际含义MHTR信息和支持中包含的内容需要从服务用户的角度进行告知,包括这可以提高参与度。社会含义治疗被视为“机器上的一个齿轮”,可能需要在句子中解决更广泛的社会不平等问题。独创性/价值本报告侧重于治疗干预的经验——MHTR社区判决的关键部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Community sentence with Mental Health Treatment Requirement (MHTR); an exploration into offenders’ experience of psychological therapy
Purpose This study aims to explore service users’ experience of psychological therapy as part of a community sentence with a Mental Health Treatment Requirement (MHTR) in Birmingham Courts between January and December 2018. Design/methodology/approach All service users that had therapy in this period were telephoned a month after ending and offered a semi-structured telephone interview. Seven service users agreed to be recorded. This data was then transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis to gain a richer understanding of their lived experience. Findings Themes identified were: Is the MHTR for me? Opening up, enlightening connections and personal change. Service users initially questioned the relevance and burden of the order for them; the experience of therapy allowed them to trust and talk about things unsaid in the past; this helped them to review and reconsider their understanding of themselves and their life choices and what further support they might need. Research limitations/implications Interviews were not completed by an independent interviewer. Experience of working with offender manager supervision additionally available throughout the sentence was not explored. Practical implications What is included in the MHTR information and support needs to be informed by the service user’s perspective, including this can improve engagement. Social implications Therapy was seen as a “a cog in the machine” and wider social inequalities may need to be addressed within the sentence. Originality/value This report focusses on experience of a therapeutic intervention – a key part of a community sentence with an MHTR.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Criminal Psychology
Journal of Criminal Psychology CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信