远端经桡动脉入路。初步经验。后果

M. Mihalev
{"title":"远端经桡动脉入路。初步经验。后果","authors":"M. Mihalev","doi":"10.3897/bgcardio.28.e79042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Conventional access through the radial artery (cTRA) is a standard approach in coronary interventions. Unfortunately, it carries a risk of long-term complications such as radial artery occlusion (RAO) and local complications, usually hematomas. Aim: Sharing initial experience in the application of distal transradial access (dTRA) on 134 patients, from single operator in one center and its applicability on patients with STEMI. Number of procedures required to get experience with this access, assessed by the degree of reduction of failed procedures. Materials and methods: From 08.03.21 to 18.11.21, 134 patients with dTRA (110 successful, 24 unsuccessful) were included in the study. dTRA is comsidered to be an access to the anatomical snuffbox. Completion of the entire procedure, not just a successful puncture or insertion of an introducer, was considered the access successful. Results: It was found that the success of the method was 82% of the criteria preset. Among the successful procedures, 48% were interventions. Of these, 71% had ACS and 43.6% had STEMI. The access was used on 3 patients who had CTO. Two patients underwent rotablation using a 7 in 6 Fr introduser. On 98% of the patients a 6 Fr introducer was used. Right dTRA was used on 93% of patients. From the 134 procedures performed, it was found that 92% of failures were up to the 80th procedures. After the 80’th procedures the frequency of failures decreased significantly. Complications ‒ 3 small hematomas and 2 numbness in the thumb, which did not require additional interventions. Conclusion: The procedure with dTRA was successfully completed by high percentage of patients, including the high-risk patients with ACS and STEMI. After the 80th dTRA procedure was reached level of skills with a low frequency of failed procedures. This suggests that dTRA can be an alternative to standard radial access to prevent radial artery occlusion, which has been confirmed by previous studies, better patient comfort, and lower risk of complications. The results were achieved without the need of reduction of the introducer’s diameter or use of special devices for hemostasis.","PeriodicalId":33976,"journal":{"name":"B''lgarska kardiologiia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distal transradial access. Initial experience. Results\",\"authors\":\"M. Mihalev\",\"doi\":\"10.3897/bgcardio.28.e79042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Conventional access through the radial artery (cTRA) is a standard approach in coronary interventions. Unfortunately, it carries a risk of long-term complications such as radial artery occlusion (RAO) and local complications, usually hematomas. Aim: Sharing initial experience in the application of distal transradial access (dTRA) on 134 patients, from single operator in one center and its applicability on patients with STEMI. Number of procedures required to get experience with this access, assessed by the degree of reduction of failed procedures. Materials and methods: From 08.03.21 to 18.11.21, 134 patients with dTRA (110 successful, 24 unsuccessful) were included in the study. dTRA is comsidered to be an access to the anatomical snuffbox. Completion of the entire procedure, not just a successful puncture or insertion of an introducer, was considered the access successful. Results: It was found that the success of the method was 82% of the criteria preset. Among the successful procedures, 48% were interventions. Of these, 71% had ACS and 43.6% had STEMI. The access was used on 3 patients who had CTO. Two patients underwent rotablation using a 7 in 6 Fr introduser. On 98% of the patients a 6 Fr introducer was used. Right dTRA was used on 93% of patients. From the 134 procedures performed, it was found that 92% of failures were up to the 80th procedures. After the 80’th procedures the frequency of failures decreased significantly. Complications ‒ 3 small hematomas and 2 numbness in the thumb, which did not require additional interventions. Conclusion: The procedure with dTRA was successfully completed by high percentage of patients, including the high-risk patients with ACS and STEMI. After the 80th dTRA procedure was reached level of skills with a low frequency of failed procedures. This suggests that dTRA can be an alternative to standard radial access to prevent radial artery occlusion, which has been confirmed by previous studies, better patient comfort, and lower risk of complications. The results were achieved without the need of reduction of the introducer’s diameter or use of special devices for hemostasis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"B''lgarska kardiologiia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"B''lgarska kardiologiia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3897/bgcardio.28.e79042\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"B''lgarska kardiologiia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3897/bgcardio.28.e79042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:通过桡动脉(cTRA)进行常规介入治疗是冠状动脉介入治疗的标准方法。不幸的是,它有长期并发症的风险,如桡动脉闭塞(RAO)和局部并发症,通常是血肿。目的:分享远端经桡动脉入路(dTRA)在134名患者中的初步应用经验,来自一个中心的单一操作员及其在STEMI患者中的适用性。获得这种访问经验所需的程序数量,根据失败程序的减少程度进行评估。材料和方法:从2011年3月8日至2011年12月18日,134名dTRA患者(110例成功,24例不成功)被纳入研究。dTRA被认为是进入解剖鼻烟盒的通道。完成整个手术,而不仅仅是成功穿刺或插入介绍器,被认为是成功的进入。结果:该方法的成功率为预设标准的82%。在成功的手术中,48%是干预措施。其中,71%患有ACS,43.6%患有STEMI。该通路用于3名CTO患者。两名患者使用7/6Fr插入器进行了旋转清除术。98%的患者使用了6Fr导引器。93%的患者使用了正确的dTRA。在进行的134次手术中,发现92%的失败发生在第80次手术之前。在第80次手术后,失败的频率显著降低。并发症——3例小血肿和2例拇指麻木,不需要额外干预。结论:dTRA手术成功率高,包括ACS和STEMI的高危患者。在第80次dTRA手术后,达到了失败率较低的技能水平。这表明,dTRA可以作为标准桡动脉介入的替代方案,以预防桡动脉闭塞,这一点已被先前的研究证实,可以改善患者的舒适度,降低并发症的风险。无需缩小导入器直径或使用特殊止血装置即可达到上述效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Distal transradial access. Initial experience. Results
Introduction: Conventional access through the radial artery (cTRA) is a standard approach in coronary interventions. Unfortunately, it carries a risk of long-term complications such as radial artery occlusion (RAO) and local complications, usually hematomas. Aim: Sharing initial experience in the application of distal transradial access (dTRA) on 134 patients, from single operator in one center and its applicability on patients with STEMI. Number of procedures required to get experience with this access, assessed by the degree of reduction of failed procedures. Materials and methods: From 08.03.21 to 18.11.21, 134 patients with dTRA (110 successful, 24 unsuccessful) were included in the study. dTRA is comsidered to be an access to the anatomical snuffbox. Completion of the entire procedure, not just a successful puncture or insertion of an introducer, was considered the access successful. Results: It was found that the success of the method was 82% of the criteria preset. Among the successful procedures, 48% were interventions. Of these, 71% had ACS and 43.6% had STEMI. The access was used on 3 patients who had CTO. Two patients underwent rotablation using a 7 in 6 Fr introduser. On 98% of the patients a 6 Fr introducer was used. Right dTRA was used on 93% of patients. From the 134 procedures performed, it was found that 92% of failures were up to the 80th procedures. After the 80’th procedures the frequency of failures decreased significantly. Complications ‒ 3 small hematomas and 2 numbness in the thumb, which did not require additional interventions. Conclusion: The procedure with dTRA was successfully completed by high percentage of patients, including the high-risk patients with ACS and STEMI. After the 80th dTRA procedure was reached level of skills with a low frequency of failed procedures. This suggests that dTRA can be an alternative to standard radial access to prevent radial artery occlusion, which has been confirmed by previous studies, better patient comfort, and lower risk of complications. The results were achieved without the need of reduction of the introducer’s diameter or use of special devices for hemostasis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信