亚太地区个人所得税与收入不平等:一项跨国分析

IF 1 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE
S. Belozyorov, O. Sokolovska
{"title":"亚太地区个人所得税与收入不平等:一项跨国分析","authors":"S. Belozyorov, O. Sokolovska","doi":"10.15826/JTR.2018.4.3.054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines analyze current features of personal income taxation, and also the relationship between income inequality, individual income taxes and several labor market indicators in Asia-Pacific countries. The income inequality issue affects basic social and economic terms as equity and equality. The increase in income inequality in countries worldwide led to vigorous debate about efficiency of progressive individual income taxation as a tool for achieving optimal level of social equity. The purpose of the study is to examine the features of progressive individual income taxation and its influence of reduction of income inequality in Asia-Pacific countries. The article analyzes current systems of personal income taxation in countries of this region and their relationship with key macroeconomic indicators. The methodology includes cross-country comparisons, principal component analysis, regression analysis. The main theoretical results include identification of causes of inefficiency of progressive individual income taxation in analyzed countries. The empirical results are related to the estimation of influence of macroeconomic factors, including labor market indicators, on individual income tax revenue. The applied methods, notably principal component analysis combined with regression analysis, can be used for estimation of influence of both quantitative and qualitative factors on tax revenue. HIGHLIGHTS 1. The tax theory suggests that the progressive individual income tax system can be an effective tool for reduction of income inequality 2. For developing Asia-Pacific countries, the progressive personal income tax systems cannot contribute to the reduction of inequality since the tax base is narrow because of high free-tax thresholds and large informal sector of the economy 3. The developed Asia-Pacific countries have relatively high personal income tax revenues and low Gini coefficients, except Singapore with high income inequality level and GDP per capita similar to developed countries. One of the main reasons of high inequality in this country are the features of government tax policy 4. In developing Asia-Pacific countries only statutory nominal gross monthly minimum wage has significant impact on individual income tax revenue, and this impact depends crucially on the GDP per capita; the main reason are high tax-free personal income thresholds in these countries FOR CITATION Belozyorov S. A., Sokolovska O. V. Personal income taxation and income inequality in Asia-Pacific: a cross-country analysis. Journal of Tax Reform , 2018, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 236–249. DOI: 10.15826/jtr.2018.4.3.054 ARTICLE INFO Received July 17, 2018; accepted August 20, 2018","PeriodicalId":53924,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Tax Reform","volume":"4 1","pages":"236-249"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Personal income taxation and income inequality in Asia-Pacific: a cross-country analysis\",\"authors\":\"S. Belozyorov, O. Sokolovska\",\"doi\":\"10.15826/JTR.2018.4.3.054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article examines analyze current features of personal income taxation, and also the relationship between income inequality, individual income taxes and several labor market indicators in Asia-Pacific countries. The income inequality issue affects basic social and economic terms as equity and equality. The increase in income inequality in countries worldwide led to vigorous debate about efficiency of progressive individual income taxation as a tool for achieving optimal level of social equity. The purpose of the study is to examine the features of progressive individual income taxation and its influence of reduction of income inequality in Asia-Pacific countries. The article analyzes current systems of personal income taxation in countries of this region and their relationship with key macroeconomic indicators. The methodology includes cross-country comparisons, principal component analysis, regression analysis. The main theoretical results include identification of causes of inefficiency of progressive individual income taxation in analyzed countries. The empirical results are related to the estimation of influence of macroeconomic factors, including labor market indicators, on individual income tax revenue. The applied methods, notably principal component analysis combined with regression analysis, can be used for estimation of influence of both quantitative and qualitative factors on tax revenue. HIGHLIGHTS 1. The tax theory suggests that the progressive individual income tax system can be an effective tool for reduction of income inequality 2. For developing Asia-Pacific countries, the progressive personal income tax systems cannot contribute to the reduction of inequality since the tax base is narrow because of high free-tax thresholds and large informal sector of the economy 3. The developed Asia-Pacific countries have relatively high personal income tax revenues and low Gini coefficients, except Singapore with high income inequality level and GDP per capita similar to developed countries. One of the main reasons of high inequality in this country are the features of government tax policy 4. In developing Asia-Pacific countries only statutory nominal gross monthly minimum wage has significant impact on individual income tax revenue, and this impact depends crucially on the GDP per capita; the main reason are high tax-free personal income thresholds in these countries FOR CITATION Belozyorov S. A., Sokolovska O. V. Personal income taxation and income inequality in Asia-Pacific: a cross-country analysis. Journal of Tax Reform , 2018, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 236–249. DOI: 10.15826/jtr.2018.4.3.054 ARTICLE INFO Received July 17, 2018; accepted August 20, 2018\",\"PeriodicalId\":53924,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Tax Reform\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"236-249\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Tax Reform\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15826/JTR.2018.4.3.054\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Tax Reform","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15826/JTR.2018.4.3.054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文考察分析了亚太国家个人所得税的现状特点,以及收入不平等、个人所得税和几个劳动力市场指标之间的关系。收入不平等问题影响到公平和平等等基本的社会经济术语。世界各国收入不平等的加剧引发了关于累进个人所得税作为实现最佳社会公平水平的工具的效率的激烈辩论。本研究的目的是考察累进个人所得税的特点及其对减少亚太国家收入不平等的影响。本文分析了该地区国家现行的个人所得税制度及其与主要宏观经济指标的关系。方法包括跨国比较、主成分分析、回归分析。主要的理论结果包括确定了所分析国家累进个人所得税效率低下的原因。实证结果与劳动力市场指标等宏观经济因素对个人所得税收入影响的估计有关。所采用的方法,特别是主成分分析与回归分析相结合的方法,可以用来估计定量和定性因素对税收的影响。亮点1。税收理论表明,累进个人所得税制度可以成为减少收入不平等的有效工具。对于发展中亚太国家来说,累进个人所得税制度不能有助于减少不平等,因为税基狭窄,因为自由征税门槛高,而且经济中有大量的非正规部门。亚太发达国家的个人所得税收入相对较高,基尼系数较低,但新加坡收入不平等程度较高,人均GDP与发达国家相近。这个国家收入不平等程度高的主要原因之一是政府税收政策的特点。在发展中亚太国家,只有法定名义最低工资对个人所得税收入有显著影响,而这种影响主要取决于人均国内生产总值;主要原因是这些国家的免税个人收入门槛较高。Belozyorov s.a, Sokolovska o.v.。亚太地区个人所得税与收入不平等:一个跨国分析。《税收改革研究》,2018年第4期。3,第236-249页。DOI: 10.15826/jtr.2018.4.3.054文章信息收于2018.07.17;2018年8月20日接受
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Personal income taxation and income inequality in Asia-Pacific: a cross-country analysis
The article examines analyze current features of personal income taxation, and also the relationship between income inequality, individual income taxes and several labor market indicators in Asia-Pacific countries. The income inequality issue affects basic social and economic terms as equity and equality. The increase in income inequality in countries worldwide led to vigorous debate about efficiency of progressive individual income taxation as a tool for achieving optimal level of social equity. The purpose of the study is to examine the features of progressive individual income taxation and its influence of reduction of income inequality in Asia-Pacific countries. The article analyzes current systems of personal income taxation in countries of this region and their relationship with key macroeconomic indicators. The methodology includes cross-country comparisons, principal component analysis, regression analysis. The main theoretical results include identification of causes of inefficiency of progressive individual income taxation in analyzed countries. The empirical results are related to the estimation of influence of macroeconomic factors, including labor market indicators, on individual income tax revenue. The applied methods, notably principal component analysis combined with regression analysis, can be used for estimation of influence of both quantitative and qualitative factors on tax revenue. HIGHLIGHTS 1. The tax theory suggests that the progressive individual income tax system can be an effective tool for reduction of income inequality 2. For developing Asia-Pacific countries, the progressive personal income tax systems cannot contribute to the reduction of inequality since the tax base is narrow because of high free-tax thresholds and large informal sector of the economy 3. The developed Asia-Pacific countries have relatively high personal income tax revenues and low Gini coefficients, except Singapore with high income inequality level and GDP per capita similar to developed countries. One of the main reasons of high inequality in this country are the features of government tax policy 4. In developing Asia-Pacific countries only statutory nominal gross monthly minimum wage has significant impact on individual income tax revenue, and this impact depends crucially on the GDP per capita; the main reason are high tax-free personal income thresholds in these countries FOR CITATION Belozyorov S. A., Sokolovska O. V. Personal income taxation and income inequality in Asia-Pacific: a cross-country analysis. Journal of Tax Reform , 2018, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 236–249. DOI: 10.15826/jtr.2018.4.3.054 ARTICLE INFO Received July 17, 2018; accepted August 20, 2018
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Tax Reform
Journal of Tax Reform BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信