书评:Kris Fallon,《真相在哪里:9/11后的数字文化与纪实媒体》

IF 1.7 Q2 COMMUNICATION
Nicholas Avedisian-Cohen
{"title":"书评:Kris Fallon,《真相在哪里:9/11后的数字文化与纪实媒体》","authors":"Nicholas Avedisian-Cohen","doi":"10.1177/1750635221991598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At the conclusion of each chapter, original artwork by Tristan Fuller illustrates and emphasizes Edwards’ points in a visual format. The author also refers to external research in order to debunk assumptions about the effects of graphic media on the viewer or to give empirical weight to her points. Weaving these theoretical accounts with empirical evidence is a major strength of the book. Edwards’ writing is strong and clear, and the additional research legitimizes her claims. The book is valuable as an introductory guide to theories on violence and visual media. However, without a stated hypothesis or question in mind, chapters at times feel disjointed and lack a cohesive link from one to the next. When presented with such a wealth of information, it would have been helpful if Edwards’ narrative voice was present to weave a link between chapters and to make sense of the vast theoretical landscape that she has introduced to the reader. Furthermore, Edwards’ investigation of violent imagery lacks sufficient content analysis to ground the theory and to exemplify how it is relevant in daily life. The text would benefit from a greater interrogation of the popular tropes and narratives that dominate violent media today. What makes violent media so insidious is its intersections with systems of oppression and domination. Only in Chapter 8 does Edwards touch upon the role of violent media in perpetuating gender stereotyping, hyper-masculinity, and white supremacy. I would have liked to have seen these topics interwoven throughout the entire book. Understanding the effects of violent imagery is more productive when combined with an in-depth understanding of the content being displayed. Finally, Edwards’ approach considers a wide variety of media and, consequently, readers are left with a basic understanding of media violence in a variety of forms. However, the book fails to develop in-depth analyses for any specific media type, such as violence as seen in film or on television. It would have profited from a clearer focus and a more elaborate discussion of fewer issues and examples. These caveats notwithstanding, Emily Edwards’ Graphic Violence: Illustrated Theories about Violence, Popular Media, and Our Social Lives provides the reader with a general overview on predominant theories related to media violence. The book addresses issues about the insidious culture of violence that remains entrenched in popular media today. When considered in its entirety, Graphic Violence serves best as an introductory blueprint for the reader, helping to build the theoretical foundations for further inquiry in the field.","PeriodicalId":45719,"journal":{"name":"Media War and Conflict","volume":"15 1","pages":"119 - 122"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1750635221991598","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book review: Kris Fallon, Where Truth Lies: Digital Culture and Documentary Media after 9/11\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas Avedisian-Cohen\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1750635221991598\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"At the conclusion of each chapter, original artwork by Tristan Fuller illustrates and emphasizes Edwards’ points in a visual format. The author also refers to external research in order to debunk assumptions about the effects of graphic media on the viewer or to give empirical weight to her points. Weaving these theoretical accounts with empirical evidence is a major strength of the book. Edwards’ writing is strong and clear, and the additional research legitimizes her claims. The book is valuable as an introductory guide to theories on violence and visual media. However, without a stated hypothesis or question in mind, chapters at times feel disjointed and lack a cohesive link from one to the next. When presented with such a wealth of information, it would have been helpful if Edwards’ narrative voice was present to weave a link between chapters and to make sense of the vast theoretical landscape that she has introduced to the reader. Furthermore, Edwards’ investigation of violent imagery lacks sufficient content analysis to ground the theory and to exemplify how it is relevant in daily life. The text would benefit from a greater interrogation of the popular tropes and narratives that dominate violent media today. What makes violent media so insidious is its intersections with systems of oppression and domination. Only in Chapter 8 does Edwards touch upon the role of violent media in perpetuating gender stereotyping, hyper-masculinity, and white supremacy. I would have liked to have seen these topics interwoven throughout the entire book. Understanding the effects of violent imagery is more productive when combined with an in-depth understanding of the content being displayed. Finally, Edwards’ approach considers a wide variety of media and, consequently, readers are left with a basic understanding of media violence in a variety of forms. However, the book fails to develop in-depth analyses for any specific media type, such as violence as seen in film or on television. It would have profited from a clearer focus and a more elaborate discussion of fewer issues and examples. These caveats notwithstanding, Emily Edwards’ Graphic Violence: Illustrated Theories about Violence, Popular Media, and Our Social Lives provides the reader with a general overview on predominant theories related to media violence. The book addresses issues about the insidious culture of violence that remains entrenched in popular media today. When considered in its entirety, Graphic Violence serves best as an introductory blueprint for the reader, helping to build the theoretical foundations for further inquiry in the field.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45719,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Media War and Conflict\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"119 - 122\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1750635221991598\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Media War and Conflict\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1750635221991598\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Media War and Conflict","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1750635221991598","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在每一章的结尾,特里斯坦·富勒(Tristan Fuller)的原创艺术作品以视觉形式说明并强调了爱德华兹的观点。作者还引用了外部研究,以揭穿关于图形媒体对观众的影响的假设,或者为她的观点提供经验权重。将这些理论叙述与经验证据相结合是本书的一大优势。爱德华兹的写作有力而清晰,另外的研究证明了她的观点是合理的。这本书作为暴力和视觉媒体理论的入门指南很有价值。然而,如果在脑海中没有一个明确的假设或问题,章节有时会感觉脱节,缺乏从一个章节到下一个章节的连贯联系。当面对如此丰富的信息时,如果爱德华兹的叙述声音能够在章节之间编织联系,并使她向读者介绍的广阔理论景观变得有意义,那将是有益的。此外,爱德华兹对暴力意象的研究缺乏足够的内容分析来支撑其理论,并举例说明它如何与日常生活相关。文本将受益于对当今主导暴力媒体的流行比喻和叙述的更大质疑。暴力媒体之所以如此阴险,是因为它与压迫和统治体系的交集。直到第8章,爱德华兹才触及暴力媒体在延续性别刻板印象、超级男性主义和白人至上主义方面的作用。我本希望看到这些主题贯穿于整本书之中。理解暴力图像的影响,如果结合对所展示内容的深入理解,会更有成效。最后,爱德华兹的方法考虑了各种各样的媒体,因此,读者对各种形式的媒体暴力有了基本的了解。然而,这本书没有对任何特定的媒体类型进行深入的分析,比如电影或电视上看到的暴力。如果对更少的问题和例子进行更明确的重点和更详细的讨论,它将会受益。尽管有这些警告,艾米丽·爱德华兹的《图解暴力:关于暴力、大众媒体和我们的社会生活的图解理论》为读者提供了与媒体暴力相关的主流理论的总体概述。这本书探讨了当今流行媒体中根深蒂固的阴险的暴力文化问题。当考虑到它的整体,图形暴力为读者提供了最好的介绍性蓝图,帮助建立在该领域进一步调查的理论基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Book review: Kris Fallon, Where Truth Lies: Digital Culture and Documentary Media after 9/11
At the conclusion of each chapter, original artwork by Tristan Fuller illustrates and emphasizes Edwards’ points in a visual format. The author also refers to external research in order to debunk assumptions about the effects of graphic media on the viewer or to give empirical weight to her points. Weaving these theoretical accounts with empirical evidence is a major strength of the book. Edwards’ writing is strong and clear, and the additional research legitimizes her claims. The book is valuable as an introductory guide to theories on violence and visual media. However, without a stated hypothesis or question in mind, chapters at times feel disjointed and lack a cohesive link from one to the next. When presented with such a wealth of information, it would have been helpful if Edwards’ narrative voice was present to weave a link between chapters and to make sense of the vast theoretical landscape that she has introduced to the reader. Furthermore, Edwards’ investigation of violent imagery lacks sufficient content analysis to ground the theory and to exemplify how it is relevant in daily life. The text would benefit from a greater interrogation of the popular tropes and narratives that dominate violent media today. What makes violent media so insidious is its intersections with systems of oppression and domination. Only in Chapter 8 does Edwards touch upon the role of violent media in perpetuating gender stereotyping, hyper-masculinity, and white supremacy. I would have liked to have seen these topics interwoven throughout the entire book. Understanding the effects of violent imagery is more productive when combined with an in-depth understanding of the content being displayed. Finally, Edwards’ approach considers a wide variety of media and, consequently, readers are left with a basic understanding of media violence in a variety of forms. However, the book fails to develop in-depth analyses for any specific media type, such as violence as seen in film or on television. It would have profited from a clearer focus and a more elaborate discussion of fewer issues and examples. These caveats notwithstanding, Emily Edwards’ Graphic Violence: Illustrated Theories about Violence, Popular Media, and Our Social Lives provides the reader with a general overview on predominant theories related to media violence. The book addresses issues about the insidious culture of violence that remains entrenched in popular media today. When considered in its entirety, Graphic Violence serves best as an introductory blueprint for the reader, helping to build the theoretical foundations for further inquiry in the field.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Media War and Conflict
Media War and Conflict COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
15.40%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Media, War & Conflict is a major new international, peer-reviewed journal that maps the shifting arena of war, conflict and terrorism in an intensively and extensively mediated age. It will explore cultural, political and technological transformations in media-military relations, journalistic practices, and new media, and their impact on policy, publics, and outcomes of warfare. Media, War & Conflict is the first journal to be dedicated to this field. It will publish substantial research articles, shorter pieces, book reviews, letters and commentary, and will include an images section devoted to visual aspects of war and conflict.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信