静电危害:识别早期预警信号,降低爆炸风险1

IF 1 4区 工程技术 Q4 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
V. Ebadat, P. Cartwright
{"title":"静电危害:识别早期预警信号,降低爆炸风险1","authors":"V. Ebadat, P. Cartwright","doi":"10.1002/prs.12525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Electrostatic discharges are known to cause many industrial fires and explosions each year. Yet it is quite usual to find that before an incident operatives have encountered signs that static electricity is present. These signs—the ‘early warning signs’—had their significance been appreciated, could have prevented many industrial fires or explosions. In this paper, we bring together evidence obtained from investigation of electrostatic incidents and group them by class of ‘manifestation’. We discuss how these classes/manifestations should be interpreted by reference to discharge types and their associated energy ranges. Finally, we discuss how we can go about assessing whether each static manifestation could lead to an electrostatically initiated fire or explosion as well as how they can be eliminated. The early warning signs of static electricity can be as apparently innocuous as dust patterns on plastic or a prickling feeling on the arms. They can also include unexpected corrosion in a glass‐lined vessel or even a pinhole leak from an insulating pipe; these in addition to the well‐recognized sparks and cracking sounds that present themselves as the more obvious face of hazardous static electricity. Waiting for an ‘early warning sign’ can never be a substitute for detailed hazard assessment work that focuses on the identification and elimination of all potential ignition sources. But it is worth noting that electrostatic sources of ignition are often considered to be more complicated to identify and eliminate than others, and consequently, they frequently elude the formal HAZOP or hazard study process. With electrostatic hazards, this makes vigilance by operatives and others that much more important, especially since electrostatic effects can easily be spotted and eliminated—if you know what to look for. A new proposed ‘classification’ that will be discussed in this paper can aid the understanding of hazardous static electricity and thus help reduce the risk of fire and explosion in industry.","PeriodicalId":20680,"journal":{"name":"Process Safety Progress","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electrostatic hazards: Identifying the early warning signs to reduce explosion risk1\",\"authors\":\"V. Ebadat, P. Cartwright\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/prs.12525\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Electrostatic discharges are known to cause many industrial fires and explosions each year. Yet it is quite usual to find that before an incident operatives have encountered signs that static electricity is present. These signs—the ‘early warning signs’—had their significance been appreciated, could have prevented many industrial fires or explosions. In this paper, we bring together evidence obtained from investigation of electrostatic incidents and group them by class of ‘manifestation’. We discuss how these classes/manifestations should be interpreted by reference to discharge types and their associated energy ranges. Finally, we discuss how we can go about assessing whether each static manifestation could lead to an electrostatically initiated fire or explosion as well as how they can be eliminated. The early warning signs of static electricity can be as apparently innocuous as dust patterns on plastic or a prickling feeling on the arms. They can also include unexpected corrosion in a glass‐lined vessel or even a pinhole leak from an insulating pipe; these in addition to the well‐recognized sparks and cracking sounds that present themselves as the more obvious face of hazardous static electricity. Waiting for an ‘early warning sign’ can never be a substitute for detailed hazard assessment work that focuses on the identification and elimination of all potential ignition sources. But it is worth noting that electrostatic sources of ignition are often considered to be more complicated to identify and eliminate than others, and consequently, they frequently elude the formal HAZOP or hazard study process. With electrostatic hazards, this makes vigilance by operatives and others that much more important, especially since electrostatic effects can easily be spotted and eliminated—if you know what to look for. A new proposed ‘classification’ that will be discussed in this paper can aid the understanding of hazardous static electricity and thus help reduce the risk of fire and explosion in industry.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Process Safety Progress\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Process Safety Progress\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.12525\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Process Safety Progress","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.12525","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

众所周知,静电放电每年造成许多工业火灾和爆炸。然而,在事故发生之前,通常会发现操作人员已经遇到了静电存在的迹象。如果人们认识到这些“早期预警信号”的重要性,它们就可以防止许多工业火灾或爆炸。在本文中,我们汇集了从调查静电事件中获得的证据,并将它们按“表现”分类。我们讨论了这些类别/表现应该如何通过参考放电类型及其相关的能量范围来解释。最后,我们讨论了如何评估每一种静电表现是否会导致静电引发的火灾或爆炸,以及如何消除它们。静电的早期预警信号可能是无害的,如塑料上的灰尘图案或手臂上的刺痛感。它们还可能包括玻璃内衬容器的意外腐蚀,甚至绝缘管道的针孔泄漏;除了众所周知的火花和破裂的声音,这些都是危险静电的更明显的表现。等待“早期预警信号”永远不能取代详细的危害评估工作,重点是识别和消除所有潜在的点火源。但值得注意的是,静电点火源通常被认为比其他点火源更难以识别和消除,因此,它们经常逃避正式的HAZOP或危害研究过程。对于静电危害,这使得操作人员和其他人的警惕变得更加重要,特别是因为静电效应很容易被发现和消除——如果你知道要寻找什么。本文将讨论一种新提出的“分类”,它有助于理解有害静电,从而有助于减少工业中发生火灾和爆炸的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Electrostatic hazards: Identifying the early warning signs to reduce explosion risk1
Electrostatic discharges are known to cause many industrial fires and explosions each year. Yet it is quite usual to find that before an incident operatives have encountered signs that static electricity is present. These signs—the ‘early warning signs’—had their significance been appreciated, could have prevented many industrial fires or explosions. In this paper, we bring together evidence obtained from investigation of electrostatic incidents and group them by class of ‘manifestation’. We discuss how these classes/manifestations should be interpreted by reference to discharge types and their associated energy ranges. Finally, we discuss how we can go about assessing whether each static manifestation could lead to an electrostatically initiated fire or explosion as well as how they can be eliminated. The early warning signs of static electricity can be as apparently innocuous as dust patterns on plastic or a prickling feeling on the arms. They can also include unexpected corrosion in a glass‐lined vessel or even a pinhole leak from an insulating pipe; these in addition to the well‐recognized sparks and cracking sounds that present themselves as the more obvious face of hazardous static electricity. Waiting for an ‘early warning sign’ can never be a substitute for detailed hazard assessment work that focuses on the identification and elimination of all potential ignition sources. But it is worth noting that electrostatic sources of ignition are often considered to be more complicated to identify and eliminate than others, and consequently, they frequently elude the formal HAZOP or hazard study process. With electrostatic hazards, this makes vigilance by operatives and others that much more important, especially since electrostatic effects can easily be spotted and eliminated—if you know what to look for. A new proposed ‘classification’ that will be discussed in this paper can aid the understanding of hazardous static electricity and thus help reduce the risk of fire and explosion in industry.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Process Safety Progress
Process Safety Progress 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Process Safety Progress covers process safety for engineering professionals. It addresses such topics as incident investigations/case histories, hazardous chemicals management, hazardous leaks prevention, risk assessment, process hazards evaluation, industrial hygiene, fire and explosion analysis, preventive maintenance, vapor cloud dispersion, and regulatory compliance, training, education, and other areas in process safety and loss prevention, including emerging concerns like plant and/or process security. Papers from the annual Loss Prevention Symposium and other AIChE safety conferences are automatically considered for publication, but unsolicited papers, particularly those addressing process safety issues in emerging technologies and industries are encouraged and evaluated equally.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信