Cobas 6800 RT-PCR检测严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型RNA的诊断准确性

S. Mahmoud, S. Ganesan, P. Raheja, F. Cantarutti, Hagar Ateia, W. Zaher
{"title":"Cobas 6800 RT-PCR检测严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型RNA的诊断准确性","authors":"S. Mahmoud, S. Ganesan, P. Raheja, F. Cantarutti, Hagar Ateia, W. Zaher","doi":"10.3389/frans.2022.1030701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to the rapid development and launch of several commercial RT-PCR-based assays for identification of SARS-CoV-2. However, there is need for peer-reviewed evaluation of these assays that can support their clinical performance. In this study, we, therefore, conduct an in-house evaluation of the automated Cobas 68000 RT-PCR assay in detecting SARS-CoV-2 infections using different pooling techniques. Methods: An observational study is conducted to evaluate the clinical performance of the Cobas 6800 SARS-CoV-2 assay in comparison with the Labgun Exofast RT-PCR kit, using both pooled and non-pooled sample techniques. A total of 300 nasopharyngeal swab samples, 40 known positive samples and 260 negative samples, are used for pooling, while the performance is evaluated in three different sample pool sizes of 4, 5, and 6. Results: The sensitivity and specificity of the Cobas 6,800 was 100% when compared to the comparable assay. The sample pooling technique showed that specificity was 100% in all pool sizes and the sensitivity varied from 95% in the 6-pooled sample to 100% in both the 5- and 4-pooled samples. The lower limit of detection was verified as 25 copies/ml for un-pooled samples, and, therefore, the limit of detection was 100, 125, and 150 copies/ml for the 4, 5, and 6 sample pools, respectively. Strong correlation was observed between the Ct values of the target genes of both assays. Conclusion: Cobas 6800 RT-PCR assay is a reliable platform for qualitative and rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 and can be effectively utilized for pooling of samples with highly efficient performance when disease prevalence is lower.","PeriodicalId":73063,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in analytical science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic accuracy of the Cobas 6800 RT-PCR assay for detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA\",\"authors\":\"S. Mahmoud, S. Ganesan, P. Raheja, F. Cantarutti, Hagar Ateia, W. Zaher\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/frans.2022.1030701\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to the rapid development and launch of several commercial RT-PCR-based assays for identification of SARS-CoV-2. However, there is need for peer-reviewed evaluation of these assays that can support their clinical performance. In this study, we, therefore, conduct an in-house evaluation of the automated Cobas 68000 RT-PCR assay in detecting SARS-CoV-2 infections using different pooling techniques. Methods: An observational study is conducted to evaluate the clinical performance of the Cobas 6800 SARS-CoV-2 assay in comparison with the Labgun Exofast RT-PCR kit, using both pooled and non-pooled sample techniques. A total of 300 nasopharyngeal swab samples, 40 known positive samples and 260 negative samples, are used for pooling, while the performance is evaluated in three different sample pool sizes of 4, 5, and 6. Results: The sensitivity and specificity of the Cobas 6,800 was 100% when compared to the comparable assay. The sample pooling technique showed that specificity was 100% in all pool sizes and the sensitivity varied from 95% in the 6-pooled sample to 100% in both the 5- and 4-pooled samples. The lower limit of detection was verified as 25 copies/ml for un-pooled samples, and, therefore, the limit of detection was 100, 125, and 150 copies/ml for the 4, 5, and 6 sample pools, respectively. Strong correlation was observed between the Ct values of the target genes of both assays. Conclusion: Cobas 6800 RT-PCR assay is a reliable platform for qualitative and rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 and can be effectively utilized for pooling of samples with highly efficient performance when disease prevalence is lower.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in analytical science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in analytical science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/frans.2022.1030701\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in analytical science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frans.2022.1030701","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:新冠肺炎大流行导致了用于识别SARS-CoV-2的几种基于RT-PCR的商业检测的快速开发和推出。然而,需要对这些分析进行同行评审,以支持其临床性能。因此,在这项研究中,我们使用不同的汇集技术对Cobas 68000自动RT-PCR检测严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型感染的方法进行了内部评估。方法:使用合并和非合并样本技术,进行一项观察性研究,以评估Cobas 6800严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型检测与Labgun Exofast RT-PCR试剂盒的临床性能。共使用300个鼻咽拭子样本、40个已知阳性样本和260个阴性样本进行汇集,同时在4、5和6个不同样本池中评估其性能。结果:Cobas 6800的灵敏度和特异性与可比测定法相比为100%。样品池技术显示,所有池大小的特异性均为100%,灵敏度从6池样品的95%到5池和4池样品的100%不等。未合并样品的检测下限为25个拷贝/ml,因此,4、5和6个样品池的检测下限分别为100、125和150个拷贝/ml。在两种测定的靶基因的Ct值之间观察到强相关性。结论:Cobas 6800 RT-PCR检测是定性快速检测严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型的可靠平台,当疾病流行率较低时,可有效地用于高效汇集样本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic accuracy of the Cobas 6800 RT-PCR assay for detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to the rapid development and launch of several commercial RT-PCR-based assays for identification of SARS-CoV-2. However, there is need for peer-reviewed evaluation of these assays that can support their clinical performance. In this study, we, therefore, conduct an in-house evaluation of the automated Cobas 68000 RT-PCR assay in detecting SARS-CoV-2 infections using different pooling techniques. Methods: An observational study is conducted to evaluate the clinical performance of the Cobas 6800 SARS-CoV-2 assay in comparison with the Labgun Exofast RT-PCR kit, using both pooled and non-pooled sample techniques. A total of 300 nasopharyngeal swab samples, 40 known positive samples and 260 negative samples, are used for pooling, while the performance is evaluated in three different sample pool sizes of 4, 5, and 6. Results: The sensitivity and specificity of the Cobas 6,800 was 100% when compared to the comparable assay. The sample pooling technique showed that specificity was 100% in all pool sizes and the sensitivity varied from 95% in the 6-pooled sample to 100% in both the 5- and 4-pooled samples. The lower limit of detection was verified as 25 copies/ml for un-pooled samples, and, therefore, the limit of detection was 100, 125, and 150 copies/ml for the 4, 5, and 6 sample pools, respectively. Strong correlation was observed between the Ct values of the target genes of both assays. Conclusion: Cobas 6800 RT-PCR assay is a reliable platform for qualitative and rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 and can be effectively utilized for pooling of samples with highly efficient performance when disease prevalence is lower.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信