在组织中训练设计思维的指南

IF 1.9 Q3 MANAGEMENT
E. M. Todd, Payton Stewart
{"title":"在组织中训练设计思维的指南","authors":"E. M. Todd, Payton Stewart","doi":"10.1108/ict-10-2022-0076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to critically review the literature on design thinking training to elucidate guidelines for best practices of design thinking training interventions.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe literature was reviewed, which outlined several themes that informed a series of recommendations for organizations considering developing design thinking training.\n\n\nFindings\nProcess-based training, delivery activities and content, skills-based approach, delivery format, support for training and training evaluation were identified as key themes in the literature. These themes highlighted practical recommendations for developing design thinking training interventions. Findings also demonstrate current limitations in the literature.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nResearch on design thinking training is limited; therefore, recommendations for training should be applied carefully. The limited research points to a fruitful area for future research and development of design thinking training.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThis paper suggests that researchers and practitioners should develop face-to-face or hybrid design thinking training interventions that follow the design thinking process and focus on the development of relevant skills, using interactive, user-focused and design visualization activities. Results suggest that adequate support for training should be provided, and outcomes of training should be empirically evaluated.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this paper is the first to review the design thinking training literature and provide general recommendations for both design thinking training development and design thinking research.\n","PeriodicalId":51647,"journal":{"name":"INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL TRAINING","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Guidelines for training design thinking in organizations\",\"authors\":\"E. M. Todd, Payton Stewart\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ict-10-2022-0076\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThe purpose of this paper is to critically review the literature on design thinking training to elucidate guidelines for best practices of design thinking training interventions.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThe literature was reviewed, which outlined several themes that informed a series of recommendations for organizations considering developing design thinking training.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nProcess-based training, delivery activities and content, skills-based approach, delivery format, support for training and training evaluation were identified as key themes in the literature. These themes highlighted practical recommendations for developing design thinking training interventions. Findings also demonstrate current limitations in the literature.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nResearch on design thinking training is limited; therefore, recommendations for training should be applied carefully. The limited research points to a fruitful area for future research and development of design thinking training.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nThis paper suggests that researchers and practitioners should develop face-to-face or hybrid design thinking training interventions that follow the design thinking process and focus on the development of relevant skills, using interactive, user-focused and design visualization activities. Results suggest that adequate support for training should be provided, and outcomes of training should be empirically evaluated.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this paper is the first to review the design thinking training literature and provide general recommendations for both design thinking training development and design thinking research.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":51647,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL TRAINING\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL TRAINING\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ict-10-2022-0076\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL TRAINING","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ict-10-2022-0076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本文的目的是批判性地回顾有关设计思维训练的文献,以阐明设计思维训练干预的最佳实践指南。设计/方法论/方法回顾了文献,其中概述了几个主题,为考虑开展设计思维培训的组织提供了一系列建议。发现基于过程的培训、交付活动和内容、基于技能的方法、交付形式、培训支持和培训评估被确定为文献中的关键主题。这些主题突出了制定设计思维培训干预措施的实用建议。研究结果也证明了目前文献中的局限性。研究局限性/含义对设计思维训练的研究是有限的;因此,应谨慎应用培训建议。有限的研究为未来设计思维训练的研究和发展指明了一个富有成果的领域。实践含义本文建议研究人员和从业者应制定面对面或混合设计思维培训干预措施,遵循设计思维过程,并通过互动、以用户为中心和设计可视化活动,重点发展相关技能。结果表明,应该为培训提供足够的支持,并根据经验评估培训的结果。原创性/价值据作者所知,本文首次回顾了设计思维训练文献,并为设计思维训练的发展和设计思维研究提供了一般性建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Guidelines for training design thinking in organizations
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to critically review the literature on design thinking training to elucidate guidelines for best practices of design thinking training interventions. Design/methodology/approach The literature was reviewed, which outlined several themes that informed a series of recommendations for organizations considering developing design thinking training. Findings Process-based training, delivery activities and content, skills-based approach, delivery format, support for training and training evaluation were identified as key themes in the literature. These themes highlighted practical recommendations for developing design thinking training interventions. Findings also demonstrate current limitations in the literature. Research limitations/implications Research on design thinking training is limited; therefore, recommendations for training should be applied carefully. The limited research points to a fruitful area for future research and development of design thinking training. Practical implications This paper suggests that researchers and practitioners should develop face-to-face or hybrid design thinking training interventions that follow the design thinking process and focus on the development of relevant skills, using interactive, user-focused and design visualization activities. Results suggest that adequate support for training should be provided, and outcomes of training should be empirically evaluated. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this paper is the first to review the design thinking training literature and provide general recommendations for both design thinking training development and design thinking research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: ■Action learning-principles and practice ■Applications of new technology ■Careers management and counselling ■Computer-based training and interactive video ■Continuing management education ■Learning methods, styles and processes ■Managing change ■Marketing, sales and customer services ■New training and learning methods ■Quality circles, team-working and business games ■Recruitment and selection ■Specialist training-needs and methods ■Youth employment and training ■Topicality Too much training theory takes too long to read and may not have immediate practical advantages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信