民族志与非正式文化的命运:重读保罗·威利斯的《学习劳动》

IF 0.4 Q4 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Y. Zhuang
{"title":"民族志与非正式文化的命运:重读保罗·威利斯的《学习劳动》","authors":"Y. Zhuang","doi":"10.1163/18765149-12341360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nAs the increasing discussion over social stratification and mobility indicates, the idea of “education changes destiny” has progressively been brought into question. In his classic study of British working-class boys from 1975, which is widely read in the fields of sociology, anthropology, and education, Paul Willis uncompromisingly revealed that liberal ideology about equal opportunity was only an empty promise and, more importantly, how the counter-cultural cognition and expression adopted the constraints of the structural conditions and at the same time leads to the reproduction of them. Despite the tragic mechanism behind the contradictory counter-culture, Willis remained optimistic about the radical potential in the symbolic works against dominant discourse. His in-depth ethnographic description didn’t only contribute to the endless theoretical debate about Structure and Process, but also provided a methodological approach encouraging extensive fieldwork, in which he believed the “theoretical uncertainty” lies. Ethnography can really “become the intellectual education of those who are governed,” if the scholars are willing to understand and communicate with the informal cultural groups and believe that their fate can be changed.","PeriodicalId":41661,"journal":{"name":"China Nonprofit Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/18765149-12341360","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethnography and the Fate of Informal Culture: Rereading Paul Willis’ Learning to Labour\",\"authors\":\"Y. Zhuang\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/18765149-12341360\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nAs the increasing discussion over social stratification and mobility indicates, the idea of “education changes destiny” has progressively been brought into question. In his classic study of British working-class boys from 1975, which is widely read in the fields of sociology, anthropology, and education, Paul Willis uncompromisingly revealed that liberal ideology about equal opportunity was only an empty promise and, more importantly, how the counter-cultural cognition and expression adopted the constraints of the structural conditions and at the same time leads to the reproduction of them. Despite the tragic mechanism behind the contradictory counter-culture, Willis remained optimistic about the radical potential in the symbolic works against dominant discourse. His in-depth ethnographic description didn’t only contribute to the endless theoretical debate about Structure and Process, but also provided a methodological approach encouraging extensive fieldwork, in which he believed the “theoretical uncertainty” lies. Ethnography can really “become the intellectual education of those who are governed,” if the scholars are willing to understand and communicate with the informal cultural groups and believe that their fate can be changed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"China Nonprofit Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/18765149-12341360\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"China Nonprofit Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/18765149-12341360\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China Nonprofit Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18765149-12341360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着对社会分层和流动性的讨论越来越多,“教育改变命运”的想法逐渐受到质疑。保罗·威利斯(Paul Willis)在1975年对英国工薪阶层男孩的经典研究中毫不妥协地透露,关于机会平等的自由主义意识形态只是一个空洞的承诺,更重要的是,反文化的认知和表达是如何接受结构条件的制约,同时又导致结构条件的再生产的。尽管矛盾的反文化背后有着悲剧性的机制,威利斯仍然对象征作品中反对主流话语的激进潜力持乐观态度。他深入的人种学描述不仅为关于结构和过程的无休止的理论辩论做出了贡献,而且还提供了一种鼓励广泛田野调查的方法论方法,他认为“理论上的不确定性”就在其中。如果学者们愿意理解和交流非正式文化群体,并相信他们的命运可以改变,那么民族志就可以真正“成为被统治者的智力教育”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ethnography and the Fate of Informal Culture: Rereading Paul Willis’ Learning to Labour
As the increasing discussion over social stratification and mobility indicates, the idea of “education changes destiny” has progressively been brought into question. In his classic study of British working-class boys from 1975, which is widely read in the fields of sociology, anthropology, and education, Paul Willis uncompromisingly revealed that liberal ideology about equal opportunity was only an empty promise and, more importantly, how the counter-cultural cognition and expression adopted the constraints of the structural conditions and at the same time leads to the reproduction of them. Despite the tragic mechanism behind the contradictory counter-culture, Willis remained optimistic about the radical potential in the symbolic works against dominant discourse. His in-depth ethnographic description didn’t only contribute to the endless theoretical debate about Structure and Process, but also provided a methodological approach encouraging extensive fieldwork, in which he believed the “theoretical uncertainty” lies. Ethnography can really “become the intellectual education of those who are governed,” if the scholars are willing to understand and communicate with the informal cultural groups and believe that their fate can be changed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
China Nonprofit Review
China Nonprofit Review PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
336
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信